Dak Is Clutch mega thread *merged*

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
LOL.

This is embarrassing now.

So “GMs” told the refs to protect Wentz and only Wentz when it comes to grabbing the knee.
Click to expand...

When Gregory asked why grabbing the knee was a penalty the refs replied the GMs instructed them to protect the QB. If you want to argue the matter, take it up with the refs because it's precisely what they said
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
When Gregory asked why grabbing the knee was a penalty the refs replied the GMs instructed them to protect the QB. If you want to argue the matter, take it up with the refs because it's precisely what they said
Click to expand...

“The QB” isn’t Wentz. It’s QBs in general. They are talking about the QB position in general.

Hits to the knee and below on QBs are penalties. They get called to other QBs as well. Often times refs exaggerate the contact because the rule states forcible contact and what Gregory did wasn’t forcible. But he’s not the first DE to get screwed on a call like that. In fact, I believe in a game earlier this year, Dak was twisted down from below the knee and got a roughing call.

My god man.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
You aren’t very bright.

“The QB” isn’t Wentz. It’s QBs in general.

My god man.
Click to expand...

When he asked why GRABBING THE KNEE IS A PENALTY they said they had to protect the QBs. In no way, shape, or form does that imply the level of protection was the same for all QBs.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
CalPolyTechnique said:
The sheer sincerity in his ignorance is almost endearing, but mostly just dumb.
Click to expand...

Wentz fans are as soft as Wentz is, I see. Criticism hurts their feelings. Need a box of tissues? Someone to protect you? Or do you think you can be unlike Wentz and survive on your own?
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
When he asked why GRABBING THE KNEE IS A PENALTY they said they had to protect the QBs. In no way, shape, or form does that imply the level of protection was the same for all QBs.
Click to expand...

Yes it does. The rules are the same for all QBs, but sometimes refs go overboard on the calls. Like the new rule on body slamming QBs. Some refs have exaggerated the contact and called a penalty when a call wasn’t warranted. Here all the ref is saying is that QBs are protected on hits to the knee and below and the ref thought Gregory violated that rule. That’s it. He wasn’t telling Gregory that the interpreted the rule special for Wentz.

To think they put in a special interpretation of the QB hit to the knee or below just for Carson Wentz is hilarious.

But keep going. This is hilarious now.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
Yes it does.

To think they put in a special interpretation of the QB hit to the knee or below just for Carson Wentz is hilarious.

But keep going. This is hilarious now.
Click to expand...

It doesn't, and I'll address your previous edit: I've watched every Dallas game this year and Dak never received that call. You're making things up, but feel free to name the game and we can check the highlights.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
It doesn't, and I'll address your previous edit: I've watched every Dallas game this year and Dak never received that call. You're making things up, but feel free to name the game and we can check the highlights.
Click to expand...

So just for the record........

Your claim is that the GMs of the league told the refs to put in a special interpretation of the QB hit to the knee just for Carson Wentz only.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
Some refs have exaggerated the contact and called a penalty when a call wasn’t warranted. Here all the ref is saying is that QBs are protected on hits to the knee and below and the ref thought Gregory violated that rule. That’s it. He wasn’t telling Gregory that the interpreted the rule special for Wentz.
Click to expand...

You keep editing stuff, don't ya?

It wasn't a hit. It clearly wasn't a hit. You are allowed to tackle a guy. When asked why it was a penalty the answer provided was "we've been asked to protect the QB"

Sydla said:
So just for the record........

Your claim is that the GMs of the league told the refs to put in a special interpretation of the QB hit to the knee just for Carson Wentz only.
Click to expand...

It's very simple. When asked why a twisting tackle, which is not a hit, was called a penalty the refs provided the answer. You keep denying and crying about it but the answer will remain the same. The GMs have asked for protection, the refs provided protection in excess to every other QB out there, when asked they gave the answer. End of story. Take it up with them. Wentz is a mental child. You're out of points.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
It's very simple. When asked why a twisting tackle, which is not a hit, was called a penalty the refs provided the answer. You keep denying and crying about it but the answer will remain the same. The GMs have asked for protection, the refs provided protection in excess to every other QB out there, when asked they gave the answer. End of story. Take it up with them. Wentz is a mental child. You're out of points.
Click to expand...

LOL. So GMs around the league asked refs to protect Carson Wentz from contact below the knee.

Makes sense.

I didn’t think it could get more embarrassing for you and yet you continue to surprise.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
LOL. So GMs around the league asked refs to protect Carson Wentz from contact below the knee.

Makes sense.

I didn’t think it could get more embarrassing for you and yet you continue to surprise.
Click to expand...

If you can't interpret the words coming out of the refs mouths than I can't help that.

I don't expect much from Wentz fans anyway, so it's not surprising.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
And another general point. This is a Dallas forum and therefore we have very Dallas favored points of view. If you guys want to immerse yourselves in more Wentz sympathetic viewpoints, then there's always, oh I don't know, the Eagles forum.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
If you can't interpret the words coming out of the refs mouths than I can't help that.

I don't expect much from Wentz fans anyway, so it's not surprising.
Click to expand...

The person who is having trouble interpreting the words is the guy who doesn’t understand what the ref is saying is overall protection for QBs. Not a specific intrepretation of the rule to protect Wentz only as directed by the “GMs”.

I doubt you’d find many people who would agree with your interpretation.
 

River82

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,119
Reaction score
903
Sydla said:
The person who is having trouble interpreting the words is the guy who doesn’t understand what the ref is saying is overall protection for QBs.
Click to expand...

Context is everything, and the context was why a penalty was called for a tackle gripping the knee. On a play which was obviously not a hit. Using an interpretation you don't see anywhere else. And the response was quoted above.

So if it's an interpretation used only for Wentz, then there is only one conclusion you can draw from those words.
 
Cebrin

Cebrin

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,942
Reaction score
4,022
I both praise, and criticize Dak. He redeemed himself, and man what a game. He ticked me off in this one. I'll eat crow, and happily. He finished strong.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,898
Reaction score
91,463
River82 said:
Context is everything, and the context was why a penalty was called for a tackle gripping the knee. On a play which was obviously not a hit. Using an interpretation you don't see anywhere else. And the response was quoted above.

So if it's an interpretation used only for Wentz, then there is only one conclusion you can draw from those words.
Click to expand...

Except there is no special interpretation for Wentz. They just made a bad call and told Gregory they called it because QBs are to be protected when a QB is hit below the knee. The refs believed the contact by Gregory was forcible. It wasn’t upon review. They made a bad call.

That’s it. But continue down your path of the stupid conspiracy where NFL GMs instructed the league to have a special interpretation of the rule just for Wentz and no other QB, like maybe their own team’s QB. As if the GM of the Chiefs wouldn’t want special interpretations of the QB rule for Mahomes.

Just Wentz. LOL.

You can have the last word. Everyone an see how foolish you sound at this point.
 
Idgit

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Romotil45 said:
Can we please wait until he wins a playoff game before we crown him clutch ? He wouldn't have had to be clutch if he didn't turn the ball over 3 times.
Click to expand...

No. He’s clutch. It everything is tied to a team’s playoff success. Clutch just means he often scores when the game is on the line, and Dak does it better than most.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top