Video: Cowherd: This is what you're going to see in the next 7 or 8 years from Dallas

bodi · Jan 14, 2019

I know I will never liv e long enuf to see Dallas win another SB

black label · Jan 14, 2019

Reality said:

Yuppers

GridironGreat · Jan 14, 2019

Could've agreed if he didn't say Goff was special and that he out QB'd Dak. Colin, you're a moron sometimes. Goff didn't do anything better than Dak. Any QB would look great when his team runs for 250+ yards...

Should probably hold off on McVay already being a future HOFer...

kskboys · Jan 14, 2019

lukin2006 said:
I know some things for sure. Nothing this clown says is new to us Cowboy fans. But when he said on his show earlier this that Dak is a little better version of Tebow is when I realized that this guy is clueless. Yes, Dak is no Brees, he is a middle of the pack QB. Tebow had no business on an NFL roster. Also, the problem with Dallas starts with Jones.

Tebow was terrible. Dak is middle of the pack.

GridironGreat · Jan 14, 2019

Overrated. There also wasn't anything special offensively with the Jaguars and Vikings last year, but they made it with great defense.

If those teams can do it with their coaching staff and Bortles/Keenum at QB, then so can we...

Chrispierce · Jan 14, 2019

I’d say that’s fair. I don’t sit around with notions of hoisting trophies anymore after year 8 with Garrett,but I do think Dak will win a divisional playoff game though. He’s a gamer in post season,and that’s enough to show me he can do it.

J817 · Jan 15, 2019

Nick Foles won the SB last year. Is he Brady Brees Mahomes special Cowherd?

Idgit · Jan 15, 2019

Well, first they said we wouldn’t win at all. He. They said we wouldn’t get over .500. Then they said we wouldn’t consistently challenge for the division. Then we were one and done in the playoffs and wouldn’t get past that hurdle.

It’s almost like, if you pay attention, people say a lot of negative things about the team that have turned out not to be true.

Get past the divisional round and. Cowherd will change his mind. Again.

Beast_from_East · Jan 15, 2019

Idgit said:
Well, first they said we wouldn’t win at all. He. They said we wouldn’t get over .500. Then they said we wouldn’t consistently challenge for the division. Then we were one and done in the playoffs and wouldn’t get past that hurdle.

It’s almost like, if you pay attention, people say a lot of negative things about the team that have turned out not to be true.

Get past the divisional round and. Cowherd will change his mind. Again.

Getting past the Divisional round is the problem however...………..we dont have the coaching or the roster to do that.

Need to upgrade both to realistically advance further, or upgrade one to be so superior that it compensates for the shortcomings of the other.

TimHortons · Jan 15, 2019

Idgit said:
Well, first they said we wouldn’t win at all. He. They said we wouldn’t get over .500. Then they said we wouldn’t consistently challenge for the division. Then we were one and done in the playoffs and wouldn’t get past that hurdle.

It’s almost like, if you pay attention, people say a lot of negative things about the team that have turned out not to be true.

Get past the divisional round and. Cowherd will change his mind. Again.

While I understand the point and sentiment, how many years does it take to slowly take forward steps? 10? 15? Is a decade not enough time to build a roster than can reach a conference championship game?

If we take a big step back next year and miss the playoffs, then there will and should be a serious discussion about changing coaches, rather than just the wishful thinking about firing Garrett that's being thrown around right now. Can't take a step back next year.

NeonNinja · Jan 15, 2019

Idgit said:
Well, first they said we wouldn’t win at all. He. They said we wouldn’t get over .500. Then they said we wouldn’t consistently challenge for the division. Then we were one and done in the playoffs and wouldn’t get past that hurdle.

It’s almost like, if you pay attention, people say a lot of negative things about the team that have turned out not to be true.

Get past the divisional round and. Cowherd will change his mind. Again.

Sorry, that’s JG ceiling (divisional round).

Cowboys22 · Jan 15, 2019

My thinking is similar. They will have limited intermittent success. The years they get to play a 2nd or 3rd place schedule, they may be good enough to make the playoffs and possibly win a playoff game but there will always be HCs and QBs much better than our current duo to knock them out after that. Then the 1st place schedule will kick in and some other east team will take the division. Playoffs in those years will depend on how strong the NFC as a whole is.

Idgit · Jan 15, 2019

TimHortons said:
While I understand the point and sentiment, how many years does it take to slowly take forward steps? 10? 15? Is a decade not enough time to build a roster than can reach a conference championship game?

If we take a big step back next year and miss the playoffs, then there will and should be a serious discussion about changing coaches, rather than just the wishful thinking about firing Garrett that's being thrown around right now. Can't take a step back next year.

It’s been, what, 23 years since we last got to a NFCCG. The issue spans more than just Garrett’s time as coach. But we’re closer now than we have been during most of that run. We’ve got structure and stability. And a good, young team.

I agree, we can’t take a step back next season, and Garrett should not automatically get extended. Let’s see what happens.

Idgit · Jan 15, 2019

NeonNinja said:
Sorry, that’s JG ceiling (divisional round).

Maybe. I heard that back when he couldn’t get over .500, though, and that certainty turned out to not be true, either.

Consistently competing for NFCCGs is tough, though. Maybe it is his ceiling. Dak’s, too. I’m not sure.

TwentyOne · Jan 15, 2019

Reality said:

Sounds more like an advertisement for the NFL.
Uh... the playoffs. People watch the playoffs. Special people. The NFL is legit.

And to say Dak is good is just ridiculous.

nate dizzle · Jan 15, 2019

Ken said:
Dak gets one possession in the 4th quarter and scores and converts the 2 point conversion...doesn't get a chance for another.

It is Dak's fault.

2nd highest QBR in the playoffs.

You doubters are clueless and should go follow Badminton.

You do know that he had possessions in the other 3 quarters too, right? Not blaming him entirely for the loss but he had a hand in it.

Brooksey · Jan 15, 2019

Romo_To_Dez said:
Cowherd, also claimed that the Patriots were finished and yet the Pats are heading to another Superbowl. He has also flipped flopped on his views of Dak. Just like week, he was doing a segment to praise Dak for something. Everyone knows that this team is held back with Garrett, that isn't breaking news.

Last week he said Rams were soft, McVay was shiny new toy that was being figured out by D-coordinators. This week he has McVay in HOF

Hardline · Jan 15, 2019

This team is a reflection of its front office.

Romo_To_Dez · Jan 15, 2019

texbumthelife said:
Thats a thick load you're shoveling considering you just gloated about accusing him of having homosexual tendencies and then attacked another poster.

So are being homophobic and hypocrital your two worst traits, or just the most obvious?

Cowherd is annoying wi

brooksey1 said:
Last week he said Rams were soft, McVay was shiny new toy that was being figured out by D-coordinators. This week he has McVay in HOF

He also picked the Eagles to lose to the Bears and then when Philly beat the Bears, he said something like how he had always believed that Philly would advance in the playoffs or that the Eagles were a dangerous playoff team. He flip flips, depending on what happens during the NFL weekend and does just enough contradictions to make himself look right, no matter what happens during NFL games.

His view about the team not getting far with Garrett is not an revelation,it's the same thing we have been saying for seasons. Also, the fact that he said Wilson had no help, when Wilson had Lynch and one of the best defenses in the history of the NFL, proves that Cowherd's opinions shouldn't carry much weight.

Stash · Jan 15, 2019

Reality said:

This is one of Cowherd's weakest, most poorly constructed cases. He tries and fails miserably to make connections between the remaining four quarterbacks - there isn't one. So he throws out "special". Fail.

He tries to connect the dissimilar head coaches the same way. "Special". Another failure. He can say what he wants about ceilings, certainly for Garrett, he's had over ten years here to show what he can and can't do. But Dak has been here for three years, and he played as well as the "special" quarterback Goff did Saturday night.

The Cowboys defense got run over, around, and through Saturday night. If you want you assess the game, be honest, and start there and don't try to somehow lay it on the quarterback. The only thing you succeed in doing by that is looking foolish and indicting your own credibility.

Video: Cowherd: This is what you're going to see in the next 7 or 8 years from Dallas

bodi

Well-Known Member

black label

Well-Known Member

GridironGreat

Well-Known Member

kskboys

Well-Known Member

GridironGreat

Well-Known Member

Chrispierce

Well-Known Member

J817

Well-Known Member

Idgit

Fattening up

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member

TimHortons

TheXFactor

NeonNinja

Dash28

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member

Idgit

Fattening up

Idgit

Fattening up

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member

nate dizzle

Well-Known Member

Brooksey

Well-Known Member

Hardline

Well-Known Member

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member

Stash