Broaddus like the idea of Golden Tate as a Cowboy

xwalker · Feb 12, 2019

Kaiser said:
I would love to see Humphries but I'm thinking Tate or Randall Cobb is a better fit.

Cobb has struggled with injuries in recent years. He was a terrific slot WR earlier in his career. During his peak years, defenses knew that it was going to be Rodgers to Cobb on 3rd down but they still couldn't stop it.

Humphries seems ideal but likely ends up getting a fairly big contract. He is bigger and younger than Beasley and he is a legit punt returner.

ShiningStar · Feb 12, 2019

oh man this would be sweet, hey heres a plan, lets ignore the problems of the team and buy pieces that wont really make a difference, good thinking.

CalPolyTechnique · Feb 12, 2019

ShiningStar said:
oh man this would be sweet, hey heres a plan, lets ignore the problems of the team and buy pieces that wont really make a difference, good thinking.

Yes, because we can only make one move per offseason. I understand the concern.

kskboys · Feb 12, 2019

Kaiser said:
Lee said it was NBD the next day:

“It’s one of those deals. It’s part of the game,” Lee said. “It’s part of football. The NFL will judge whether that’s legal or not. Whatever it is, I’ll deal with it. I’m on to the next game. I’m not worried about it. I’m more worried about how we can be better on defense, how we can improve from the mistakes we made.”

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/18/sean-lee-calls-golden-tate-block-part-of-football/

If someone gets upset because they got hit, football is not the best choice for them!!!!!!!

Kaiser · Feb 12, 2019

xwalker said:
Humphries seems ideal but likely ends up getting a fairly big contract. He is bigger and younger than Beasley and he is a legit punt returner.

Totally agree, he would be great but the contract won't be a good fit. I think Tate on a smaller contract and drafting one more WR in the 3rd or 4th round is a better fit.

ShiningStar · Feb 12, 2019

CalPolyTechnique said:
Yes, because we can only make one move per offseason. I understand the concern.

WR wasnt a concern or is a concern, even if we lost Beasly, its still not a high priority.

garyv · Feb 12, 2019

J12B said:
Rather see Humphries from Tampa Bay brought in.

He could make some noise in Dallas

This was my dream Humphries instead of Beasley

BenTramer · Feb 12, 2019

The Quest for Six said:
Always liked Tate's game coming out of college but at this point, I'd rather Cooper in the slot if Beasley doesn't come back..

Beasley is not coming back because Garrett is still here.

mattjames2010 · Feb 12, 2019

I'd rather look at someone like Crowder.

Kaiser · Feb 12, 2019

BenTramer said:
Beasley is not coming back because Garrett is still here.

Jason Garrett and an out of control ego, but mostly an out of control ego.

ShiningStar · Feb 12, 2019

remember when all the fans loved Beasley and he was the man?

Big_D · Feb 12, 2019

Rather keep Beasley.

Plankton · Feb 12, 2019

Absolutely love the player. Would be fantastic to have him on the team - he's hard nosed, and runs like a running back after the catch. His attitude fits in with a team that likes to be physical on offense. That being said, I can't see it happening.

Alexander · Feb 12, 2019

mattjames2010 said:
I'd rather look at someone like Crowder.

I would throw my vote that way as well. Younger, has more upside.

BlueNSilver88 · Feb 12, 2019

We need to pay our own. This guy is getting old anyway

Big_D · Feb 12, 2019

Donte Moncrief?

lukin2006 · Feb 12, 2019

I'd take him, he a shifty fellow who throws a mean block...he is great after the catch. Get him.

Cattle_Rancher · Feb 12, 2019

Would rather draft Hollywood Brown. Brown is a true burner we haven’t seen that kind of speed since Rocket plus he is slippery as an eel so even if Dak throws short Brown can make plays.

Hardline · Feb 12, 2019

I'll take him on one condition
Sean Lee gets to get a full running start blind side hit on him.

MRV52 · Feb 12, 2019

What did Tate do in Philthy? Absolutely nothing.

Broaddus like the idea of Golden Tate as a Cowboy

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

What's it going to be then, eh?

Throwing up the X

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

rat2k8