Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,009
- Reaction score
- 20,205
There is no way we do that. In the end, it would cost us any chance to win long term. Heck, short term would be a stretch, IMO.
Spot on. That's exactly the point.
People can't look at these contracts in a vacuum. They have to be viewed in the big picture.
I think what most of the "pay the man" parrots on this board are forgetting is that Tank KNOWS with a reasonable degree of certainty what he would make on the open market. It is naive to think otherwise.
Knowing that, the "decisional flow chart" goes something like this:
1. Are the Cowboys willing to pay him what he will make on the open market? If so he gets signed for market value.
2. If the Cowboys are not willing to pay him market value, then he either has to (a) play with the Cowboys for less than market value or (b) get tagged or traded or (c) both.
3. I guess the third option would be the Cowboys just let him walk out the door for a comp pick, but I consider that unlikely because he has trade value.