Since 2012 Beasley ranks 55th among WRs in yards

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
Biggest problem with that guaranteed cash is that nobody guarantees for more than 3 years, and that's nearly $7M a year in cap hit. $15M guaranteed you have a discussion, but i can't see him doing that much better on teh open market.
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
Biggest problem with that guaranteed cash is that nobody guarantees for more than 3 years, and that's nearly $7M a year in cap hit. $15M guaranteed you have a discussion, but i can't see him doing that much better on teh open market.
That is a lot for a 30 year old small WR
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
56,957
Reaction score
64,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Good player at what he does
Getting too old and expensive
This draft has a good number of slot guys
Time to get younger and cheaper
Totally agree, but the poster I responded to was way off base in regards to evaluating Beasley's past accomplishments.

Beasley has been a terrific slot WR but he is too old to pay.

Tavon Austin 1 year, 3M
Draft.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
56,957
Reaction score
64,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
How about total receptions?

He’s 52nd with 319. Amendola is 39th with 352.

Charles Clay the TE is 50th with 323.

Cobb and Nelson are each top 20 with 445.

Unless Kellen Moores offense is more like the Packers, there’s no reason to invest in a slot WR.

Nelson was not a slot WR.

Amendola plays both slot and outside.

Cobb was one of the highest paid WRs in the league at one time.

I'm not advocating paying Beasley. He'll be 30 at the start of the season and is a slot-only WR and is not really a punt returner; however, he has been a terrific player for the Cowboys in his role and consistently drew double coverage in 2017 which is a rare feat for a slot WR. He was well worth his previous 3M per contract.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327

Now here's the huge flaw with that. They compared SLOT receivers with WIDE receivers. WR play every down, slots do not. WR are there to stretch the field, SLOT receivers run shorter routes basically to get 1st downs. Starting in 2017 there have been plays where Beasley as a SLOT was getting double coverage so defenses were aware of his capabilities. Your list is just like when QB's and WR's run the ball and their total yards are way down the list compared to what RB's get. Why - because they don't run the ball on every downjust like SLOT receivers don't play every down and aren't there to run deep routes.
.
 

Parcells4Life

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
9,346
Now here's the huge flaw with that. They compared SLOT receivers with WIDE receivers. WR play every down, slots do not. WR are there to stretch the field, SLOT receivers run shorter routes basically to get 1st downs. Starting in 2017 there have been plays where Beasley as a SLOT was getting double coverage so defenses were aware of his capabilities. Your list is just like when QB's and WR's run the ball and their total yards are way down the list compared to what RB's get. Why - because they don't run the ball on every downjust like SLOT receivers don't play every down and aren't there to run deep routes.
.
I also did total catches. He was 52nd on that list.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
Totally agree, but the poster I responded to was way off base in regards to evaluating Beasley's past accomplishments.

Beasley has been a terrific slot WR but he is too old to pay.

Tavon Austin 1 year, 3M
Draft.

Has Beasley slowed down or he doesn't run really good routes anymore? If Beasley is to old now than Larry Fitzgerald should have retired 6 years ago.
.
 

Number1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
1,326
I also did total catches. He was 52nd on that list.

since there are only 32 starting WRs ... that's well done the list of SWRs as well

He's a great athlete, pound for pound a beast, and Dak's favorite target ... that don't justify $20 guaranteed on a team with 1 decent DT and weak LGs.

Pay big men and QBs, the rest can be replaced fairly easy.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
56,957
Reaction score
64,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Has Beasley slowed down or he doesn't run really good routes anymore? If Beasley is to old now than Larry Fitzgerald should have retired 6 years ago.
.
Are you really comparing Beasley to Larry Fitzgerald?
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
Good player at what he does
Getting too old and expensive
This draft has a good number of slot guys
Time to get younger and cheaper

And tell me has EVERY player that comes out of college been better than the player they replaced. There's never been a player thought to be good and turned out to be a bust. Are you guaranteeing that if the Cowboys let Beasley walk that some rookie is going to be as good and get double coverage sometimes like Beasley does? There are reasons why some players have longer careers than others because of how they play.
.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
since there are only 32 starting WRs ... that's well done the list of SWRs as well

He's a great athlete, pound for pound a beast, and Dak's favorite target ... that don't justify $20 guaranteed on a team with 1 decent DT and weak LGs.

Pay big men and QBs, the rest can be replaced fairly easy.

In the NFL most of the time teams have TWO starting wide receivers so that would make it 64 starting WR's not 32. They all have a #1 receiver so ya there are 32 #1 WR's but most of the time there's another WR on the opposite side of the line. Now the normal exception is on short yardage when they bring in another TE so the #2 receiver isn't on the field.
.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
Are you really comparing Beasley to Larry Fitzgerald?

No I'm saying if 29 is to old now to play and Fitzgerald is 35 and will be 36 before the 2019 season starts it's foolish to just say because of age a player is to old. As I also said has Beasley slowed down or stop running really good routes?
.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,482
Reaction score
21,742
Given the sheer volume of space they have, the Colts could sign an impact defender or two and still have more than enough left over to add a similarly impactful player on the other side of the ball. The best-case scenario would be a moderate length deal for Golden Tate, who is just about as perfect a fit across from T.Y. Hilton as there has ever been. The Colts cycled through a whole lot of That Guys across from Hilton last season but Tate would provide a consistency and upside at the position that nobody else they used could ever reach. Failing a deal with him, Cole Beasley would make an interesting target as an option for the slot.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...ag=SNL-04-10aaa0c&ET_CID=72668&ET_RID=6932623
 

Number1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
1,326
In the NFL most of the time teams have TWO starting wide receivers so that would make it 64 starting WR's not 32. They all have a #1 receiver so ya there are 32 #1 WR's but most of the time there's another WR on the opposite side of the line. Now the normal exception is on short yardage when they bring in another TE so the #2 receiver isn't on the field.
.

I did mis-phrase that ... starting go to "#1 WR's", they generally play X,

Y and Z WRs tend to split targets

Beasley's one of the best Zs, but unless you picture the Boys scrapping their timing system to get better use of him by cheating with down field screens (like a rub offense) $20M locked is kinda crazy
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
56,957
Reaction score
64,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No I'm saying if 29 is to old now to play and Fitzgerald is 35 and will be 36 before the 2019 season starts it's foolish to just say because of age a player is to old. As I also said has Beasley slowed down or stop running really good routes?
.
If Beasley would sign for a reasonable amount, then he has value remaining, but it's doubtful that he is worth what he wants even if 3 years younger. The age issue just makes it an easier decision.

At a year older, Edelman signed for 2 years, 11M total.

Also, Beasley is limited. He does not have the deep speed of many small WRs. His limits put limits on the overall offense because it makes it more predictable than it would be with either a bigger player or elite speed player in the slot. Randall Cobb Edelman, Amendola, etc.. are all bigger.

Tyreek Hill is similar height but his insane speed allows him to play anywhere.

Think about a good but not elite player like Anthony Hitchens. Seeing Vander Esch and Jaylon should make it obvious why the Cowboys were wise not to pay Hitchens 9M per. Beasley like Hitchens is a limited player.
 
Top