What could we get for Lawrence and Cooper?

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.

First, what college player is going to be as good as Lawrence and Cooper as a rookie? Second, just because we gave up a 1st for Cooper doesn't mean that another team would. Third, what if these draft picks are late 1st rnd picks and the best players or the ones you're thinking about aren't there? Fourth, trading off your best players is saying hey we're rebuilding and have written off this season already. I'd rather keep the good players and just worry about resigning our own players and filling in the holes in the draft.
.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
I always hate to see these kinds of threads because after all of these years, I know what's coming. So rather then adding to the pile on, I will just say that perhaps the poster has a point. I don't think you lose Cooper if at all possible but we don't know what the contract expectations might be and we don't know if we will be able to sign him. He has significant value, probably more now then when we traded for him. We could definitely get more for him then what we gave up.

As far as DLaw, his future is on him to me. He's not getting top money IMO. I think the team has already probably made a decision on what they are willing to give up, JMO. Trading him might also be an option, if not a necessity. If he won't play on the Tag, then I don't think there is an option. He has value, moving him saves us a lot of cap and probably allows for signing and resigning some important pieces.

I think it would be wise for all of us to continue to keep our options open.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,009
Reaction score
20,205
While the original post is not a good idea we should have already done Coopers deal if we are going to extend him. That way we know what he is expecting and can explore options if he is asking for too much. We can't let Cooper hold us hostage any more than any other player.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,570
Reaction score
12,273
the likelihood he signs and plays under the tag is 70-20. THAT SAID, the longer this gets played out without a deal longterm..he could find himself gone.In the end, he will sign the tag and worst case, play under it again.

70-20?

Is math not your strong suit?
 

Richmond Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,666
Reaction score
3,351
We could get high draft picks to draft potentially good players. Once they become good players people will then suggest trading them.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
32,024
Reaction score
36,453
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.
Did you see our passing game without Cooper. Our DL was playing well then, and we were still 3-5
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,009
Reaction score
20,205
I always hate to see these kinds of threads because after all of these years, I know what's coming. So rather then adding to the pile on, I will just say that perhaps the poster has a point. I don't think you lose Cooper if at all possible but we don't know what the contract expectations might be and we don't know if we will be able to sign him. He has significant value, probably more now then when we traded for him. We could definitely get more for him then what we gave up.

As far as DLaw, his future is on him to me. He's not getting top money IMO. I think the team has already probably made a decision on what they are willing to give up, JMO. Trading him might also be an option, if not a necessity. If he won't play on the Tag, then I don't think there is an option. He has value, moving him saves us a lot of cap and probably allows for signing and resigning some important pieces.

I think it would be wise for all of us to continue to keep our options open.

Excellent well thought out post. Almost none of us wasn't to see Cooper or Tank go, but you always have to do a cost benefit analysis.

No one wanted to trade Herschel Walker either, but the opportunity arose and it was too good to pass up. It can either be too good of an opportunity to pass up, OR the cost can be too great to keep a player around. Hard decisions must be made.
 

MizzouCowboy4

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
1,930
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.





Buy buy has to be a troll?
 

Captain43Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,317
Reaction score
7,578
An 8 win season. I know this is plasephemy, but I think Cooper would be a bigger loss than Lawrence. Lawrence disappeared vs the Rams.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,499
Reaction score
26,558
While the original post is not a good idea we should have already done Coopers deal if we are going to extend him. That way we know what he is expecting and can explore options if he is asking for too much. We can't let Cooper hold us hostage any more than any other player.

Then we better go get another QB because Dak without Coop was a straight up disaster and we were looking at 6-10 at best.

This aint Aaron Rogers we are talking about here where you can put a bunch of practice squad WRs on the field and he makes them all look decent. Its quite the opposite, we need all-pro caliber WRs to make our QB look decent.

Not hating on Dak, just keeping it real.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,945
Reaction score
25,842
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.
Probably the top pick next year from losing each week and the picks for them
We could draft a bunch of guys to trade off the next year then
 

yentl911

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,432
Reaction score
1,353
What can we get for Cooper and Lawrence? A chance to work on our golf game come playoff time.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
35,826
Reaction score
13,373
52sOua.jpg

lol...awesome. But it's all good...
 

Pants

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,250
Reaction score
6,384
I can't read 4 pages to say "what the.....?" why not throw "what can we get if we trade the entire OLine to someone?" out there? "what can we get for LVE and Jaylon?"

my God, posting rights need to be limited
 

Aerolithe_Lion

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,864
Reaction score
11,827
If no one but you was willing to give up a 1 for Cooper while they were in the middle of a playoff hunt, why would they give up a 1 Now with 1 fewer years left on that rookie contract?
 

dallas72

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
835
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.
Were all dumber for having read this post...this isnt Madden
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,158
Reaction score
7,454
Problem: Lawrence is injured and wants a huge contract, Gregory probably isn't back this year, and now Crawford has issues. DE is looking bad for us, with a great dline draft.

Solution?: Flip Cooper. Trade Lawrence. Use picks for the dline. Free up 40mil per year.

Question: Could we get a 1st out of each? Maybe a 1st plus?

We gave up a first for Cooper. And I think he's exceeded expectations. Shouldn't he be worth more now?

If you thought that giving up a 1st for Cooper was a good deal for us last year, shouldn't it be an even better deal now for the team we trade Cooper to?

And for Lawrence, wasn't he considered in the top few free agents in the league? I'd expect that to net more than Cooper.

*If* you think the Cooper deal was good for us, shouldn't we get two 1sts plus out of trading Cooper and Lawrence?

I'd be happy with that with a dline heavy draft to build with.
shoot me now
 
Top