Lets take the 20th best DT instead of the third best FS
Ding Ding Ding. How anyone can justify that pick if some of the better Safeties are there are just braindead. I think the OP might be Rod Marinelli's account. And should be banned.Lets take the 20th best DT instead of the third best FS
Ding Ding Ding. How anyone can justify that pick if some of the better Safeties are there are just braindead. I think the OP might be Rod Marinelli's account. And should be banned.
Well yeh obviously. But every 3T "fits" our system. I like the kid but only if all safety talent is wiped out.Please learn how to read. I said take Rapp, Thornhill first (and assuming Adderley is gone & Gardner is off our board after the flunked interview). So if top 6 safeties are gone, don't reach for a safety. Take the best available 3-tech that fits our system. And that's Hill.
Please learn how to read. I said take Rapp, Thornhill first (and assuming Adderley is gone & Gardner is off our board after the flunked interview). So if top 6 safeties are gone, don't reach for a safety. Take the best available 3-tech that fits our system. And that's Hill.
It does say NOT A S right in the post titleYep. Drives me nuts when people just take bits and pieces. Totally what you wrote.
If this is accurate why are we wasting time with him? Obviously Marinelli doesn't have an issue with him.This guy scares me,the knock on him is he has poor lateral agility.I dont know why Rod will like a 3T who has poor lateral movement.
{grits teeth}
I mean why make that title if that's not what he meant. It's like my wife starting off the conversation with a topic then ending up saying something completely different.Yep. Drives me nuts when people just take bits and pieces. Totally what you wrote.
lol. i didn't know broads was in here playing mind games with titles now. I said Not A Safety but didn't actually mean itIt does say NOT A S right in the post title