Would Hill have gone 1st round if not for attitude?

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,977
Reaction score
9,145
We don't ask the 3 tech to be a run stopper.

Also that's a matter of technique and discipline not ability.

As I've stated numerous times you make fewer mistakes when you take big over little. Especially when that big is a big time athlete with a skill that translates favorably to the NFL.

/shrug.

Why in the world would we not want a DT to effect the run? You don think Marinelli would be ecstatic if he got better run D from his DTs against Indy and Rams?

Wherever this misconception came from that DTs just eat blocks so LBs make tackles is insane.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
It would have been a pretty awesome feat.

Actually, it is not common that a college staff buries a player and he still goes in the 2nd round.

I can appreciate that Marinelli trusts Frost, but that is a huge deal. That is us basically telling the current staff at UCF that they don't know what they were dealing with.
They blocked him from transferring with other players. Sounds like they don't know what they're dealing with.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,841
Reaction score
91,350
He would have potentially been a first round if he actually played better.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,399
Reaction score
47,279
Why in the world would we not want a DT to effect the run? You don think Marinelli would be ecstatic if he got better run D from his DTs against Indy and Rams?

Wherever this misconception came from that DTs just eat blocks so LBs make tackles is insane.
I find it very strange the Marinelli/Jerry don't comprehend the effects a big dude has on a D. Raji, Knighton, Wilfork, Alan Branch, all were important cogs in their team's super bowl runs. Thing is, unless they're consistently disruptive like Wilfork, you cannot afford to overpay them. That's why the Pats employ a strategy of signing, using, then walking away from them as soon as they want a big contract. They let Branch and Brown walk, but then immediately replaced them w/ Danny Shelton, a huge guy. And while Belly does not play them every down, they are very important to the rotation and at times real difference makers.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,751
Reaction score
36,267
No, they don't. There are no proven skills of college prospects. That really doesn't make sense.
Actually there is. That's the very basis on what determines the round the player is taken. First rounders are never taken on traits. you get your trait players in undrafted free agency. I can't believe I have to explain this.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,399
Reaction score
47,279
Actually there is. That's the very basis on what determines the round the player is taken. First rounders are never taken on traits. you get your trait players in undrafted free agency. I can't believe I have to explain this.
There is no explanation that works, because you are incorrect. I can't believe I have to explain this!!!!!!!

All players are taken on traits. Players who are taken strictly on production often flop. College production is a very poor indicator of pro success. It is different for every position, of course. Production can and should be taken into consideration, just as all data should be. However, the players who consistently produce do so due to traits. First step quickness, lateral agility, burst out of the breaks, strength, motor. Those are the major ones for positions aside from QB. Drafting a QB is a horse of a different color, I think we can all agree to that.
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,901
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Don't think so in this class but with his measurables, and a man that can have a vertical of 35" at his size is nuts. He also doesn't fit the systems of some of these DC's.

However, his ceiling is higher than some of the DT's taken ahead of him and, in the first round, and is exactly what fits Marinelli's system.

I think as more details come to light about that coaching change at UCF and his reaction, more teams are going to think that might have let that enter their grading a little too much.

This latest about being denied by UCF to transfer to be with his HC is about as dumb as it gets. The kid doesn't want to play for you, let him go. But he was their best DL and too many wanted to follow Frost, the guy really responsible for people even knowing UCF existed.

Hill will not be measured against the other DL in this draft, he will be measured against the Safety's that the Cowboys passed on by a lot in this forum...….the Greg Ellis Syndrome.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Always hard to play the what if game, I will say if his snap count was greatly reduced then that is less opportunity to be on the field making plays and could have cost him in the draft
 

Hennessy_King

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,623
Reaction score
25,418
Don't think so in this class but with his measurables, and a man that can have a vertical of 35" at his size is nuts. He also doesn't fit the systems of some of these DC's.

However, his ceiling is higher than some of the DT's taken ahead of him and, in the first round, and is exactly what fits Marinelli's system.

I think as more details come to light about that coaching change at UCF and his reaction, more teams are going to think that might have let that enter their grading a little too much.

This latest about being denied by UCF to transfer to be with his HC is about as dumb as it gets. The kid doesn't want to play for you, let him go. But he was their best DL and too many wanted to follow Frost, the guy really responsible for people even knowing UCF existed.

Hill will not be measured against the other DL in this draft, he will be measured against the Safety's that the Cowboys passed on by a lot in this forum...….the Greg Ellis Syndrome.
I will be here to let everyone know when Thornhill gets an INT. I mean at this point I hope Hill plays better tho.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Guys, he's not a 1st round talent. If he were, his attitude wouldn't even matter. If he were a first round talent, teams would have overlooked it. Too many examples of idiots getting drafted in the first round with way worse attitudes. He might develop into a pretty solid player Hill is not a First Round talent IMO.

Still, it doesn't mean that he can't develop into a pretty nice player for us. He does have some tools.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,328
Reaction score
95,984
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Not sure if he would be a 1st or not. I don't think so. I think they still could have got him 5 picks or so lower. Maybe even 10.
But he is not like many with the typical "we don't like any player" post, as bad saying he is a project and all that. He will be productive in the rotation right away.

I had him in 2 mock drafts, one in the 2nd round and one in the 3rd round. Which does not mean thing.
But he was one of a few players I had in multiple mocks. Which still means nothing.
But the more I read about him, seen more on film. And seen the reasoning why he was not starting, but sure got a lot of playing time so it seems. The more I think we got good value. Maybe not 1st round value, maybe not high 2nd round value, like the top 6 or 8 in the 2nd round. But say 9 to 15 2nd round range.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,046
Reaction score
21,906
If he had played more/produced more he could have been a 1st round pick. His physical talent is as good as many of the DL taken in the first round.
 

QuincyCarterEra

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,324
Reaction score
10,736
Had a mid-3rd on him without off field issues

This pick, the Pollard pick, Donovan Wilson, and DE Jackson all left a ton to be desired.
 
Top