What If: The Cowboys Drafted Randy Moss? | Alternate NFL Reality

northerncowboynation

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,925
Reaction score
6,303
Isn't this part of the hypothetical? In my "What if", Moss would have been fun to watch, but a locker room headache that wouldn't have changed the overall path we were heading to. Jerry is bad now, but he was out of his mind in from 2000 to about 2004. Not only was Jerry on this "save a lost soul" kick, the coach hiring was quite awful as well.

I think Jimmy Smith, like someone else mentioned here, is a more positive "what if" - Irvin, Emmitt, and Aikman would have all been still in their primes and Smith/Irvin would have been EASILY the best duo in the league for about 4-5 years.

Ok, gotcha
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,002
Reaction score
20,194
Idk man those early 00s teams were way different from a locker room perspective...

Aikman playing on fumes then turning over to Carter...

I still remember the pic or Quincy wearing his cowboys sweats and looking all jacked up that was posted on here over and over. Good times.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
That is no excuse why you don't draft Randy Moss. The only pressure he would've had was fitting in as a rookie. There were positive influences on that team as well.

That's like saying the only pressure Greg Hardy felt as a Cowboy was fitting in.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,223
Reaction score
31,710
This thread matters not. We didn't draft him. Other teams passed on him too. Can't live in the past. Always look at today.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,223
Reaction score
31,710
This isn't Narnia. We live in the now that we call reality. Dunno about you all, but Im so over Randy Moss.
 

PJTHEDOORS

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,190
Reaction score
18,582
I'll bet you think there was a 2nd gunman in the grassy knoll too. It's funny, not ha ha funny, that Aikman has repeated many many many times since retiring during interviews and while doing color during FOX games that he would have played longer if not for the back injury and the concussions. Take you conspiracy theory and put it where the sun don't shine.
.

Was.
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,766
Reaction score
8,775
Wouldn't have worked. Cowboys of the 90's partied too hard, considering Moss's history, I think there would've been off the field issues, giving the Cowboys another black eye.
 

Johnny23

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
1,757
Which was the bigger mistake?

Not drafting Moss in 1998 (The Cowboys used the 8th overall pick on Greg Ellis).

Cutting WR Jimmy Smith in 1994.
The cost to keep Smith was just his salary which was a relatively trivial amount.

Obviously Moss is the better player but he would have cost an early 1st round pick; whereas Smith was basically free (in terms of draft capital or PR issues).
Handing Derrick Brooks to Tampa in the 1995 backup draft to use said pick on Ask Sherman Williams.

I mean that's still flabbergasting.

Jimmy was a stud. He has said Dallas cutting him put a chip on his shoulder. It might not have been the same Jimmy we saw in Jacksonville who proved us wrong for cutting him.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327

It's funny, not ha ha funny, that the 2nd gunman theorists ONLY have their theory and not a single littlest physical proof that there was. That's why when 2nd gunman theorists bring it up they get mocked and laughed at by 99.999% of the people.
.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
You didnt watch aikmans football life then

I may not have but I've read or heard interviews and heard himself say several times while announcing games that his back injury and concussions are what made him decide to retire.
.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,898
Reaction score
22,429
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Aikman was deadly accurate going deep.
You just didn't see it much because of the running game and Jay Novacek.
Aikman dropped dimes on deep WRs when the play called for it.
Michael Irvin is literally in the Hall of Fame because of it.
We will have to agree to disagree on that. And no, that is not why Irvin is in the HOF. Irvin’s strength was precise routes in the short to intermediate passing game, using his body to shield defenders from the ball, and being exactly on the same page as Aikman. He wasn’t exceptional as a deep downfield threat, nor did he have great speed. Again that was Alvin Harper’s role.
 

Rayman70

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,223
Reaction score
31,710
We will have to agree to disagree on that. And no, that is not why Irvin is in the HOF. Irvin’s strength was precise routes in the short to intermediate passing game, using his body to shield defenders from the ball, and being exactly on the same page as Aikman. He wasn’t exceptional as a deep downfield threat, nor did he have great speed. Again that was Alvin Harper’s role.
Aikman WAS deadly accurate on all types of throws. Irvin made him look great when some of his deep balls weren't so accurate..at times. Then again, that's what great playmakers do.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,746
Reaction score
36,266
We will have to agree to disagree on that. And no, that is not why Irvin is in the HOF. Irvin’s strength was precise routes in the short to intermediate passing game, using his body to shield defenders from the ball, and being exactly on the same page as Aikman. He wasn’t exceptional as a deep downfield threat, nor did he have great speed. Again that was Alvin Harper’s role.
It's like you totally missed Cowboys football in the 90s.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,746
Reaction score
36,266
That's like saying the only pressure Greg Hardy felt as a Cowboy was fitting in.
The only pressure is self inflicted pressure.
Don't put it on yourself and there won't be any
 
Top