Post-draft team analysis: DL

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
I did find 1 season where the combination of suspended players plus active players got them to 11 to start the season.

Probably will be the same this year, if you're counting suspended players. Gregory most likely will miss the year and we'll keep 10 others.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
I think Joe Jackson was a steal and is more talented. He was on a really bad D and needs some technique work.

So far, Hyder is a one year wonder. He had 8 sacks in 16. Not like he blew up the league. Still, he's always been disruptive, so I do like adding him to the rotation.

Maybe, but Armstrong showed ability to contribute on this level and has one year under his belt working to get better.

Hyder's eight sacks in 16 games is nothing to sneeze at. That's good production. He may never be able to get back to that level, but definitely is a guy worth looking at, so I'm glad we're doing it.

I don't think they are studs, so if Jackson proves to be one, then he has to be kept. Right now, Lawrence and Quinn are the only proven studs (Gregory was headed that way last year). Hill has the skills to be one at 3-tech, but we'll see how that goes. The rest are mainly good depth, rotational players, with some having the potential to be more than that.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
I don't see enough at DT for dominance. Probably a solid rotation. I'd say better than JAGs, but no one particularly good either.

But if Gregory is back and Lawrence stays healthy, Gregory, Lawrence, and Quinn could be a great DE pass rush rotation.

I believe the reason that we took a chance on Hill is because he can be that dominant player at 3-tech. We already had solid players there in Crawford and Collins (when healthy) and added more of a run-stopper with some pass-rush ability in Covington and more of a pass rusher with some run-stopping ability in Hyder. Hill was a shot at getting the type of 3-tech this defense needs ... a player who creates havoc in the middle against both the run and pass to allow the ends to clean up.

As you said, we have what could be a great end rotation, but the effectiveness of the ends is enhanced or lessened by the 3-tech play. We've got to have more there than what we've been getting from those solid rotational pieces.

With Hill, we're probably a year or so away from really finding out if he can be that dominant 3-tech, so we need those other guys to provide enough for us to contend now. I'm really intrigued with Hyder from that standpoint. I think he has the quickness to disrupt consistently as a DT, even though he'll get pushed around some inside against the run.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
I believe the reason that we took a chance on Hill is because he can be that dominant player at 3-tech. We already had solid players there in Crawford and Collins (when healthy) and added more of a run-stopper with some pass-rush ability in Covington and more of a pass rusher with some run-stopping ability in Hyder. Hill was a shot at getting the type of 3-tech this defense needs ... a player who creates havoc in the middle against both the run and pass to allow the ends to clean up.
.

Totally agree, we have great numbers at DL but there is still plenty of question marks. I think Maliek Collins may be the biggest question (beyond Gregory of course), he might be a very good 3T that buys development time for Hill - but he has been injured as often as not.

The development of Armstrong and Taco should give us more production but you can't bank it. We could end up with a very good DL that goes 10 deep, or we may end up with 5 guys that we can really count on. You have to think the youth and numbers give us good odds however.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,399
Reaction score
47,279
Maybe, but Armstrong showed ability to contribute on this level and has one year under his belt working to get better.

Hyder's eight sacks in 16 games is nothing to sneeze at. That's good production. He may never be able to get back to that level, but definitely is a guy worth looking at, so I'm glad we're doing it.

I don't think they are studs, so if Jackson proves to be one, then he has to be kept. Right now, Lawrence and Quinn are the only proven studs (Gregory was headed that way last year). Hill has the skills to be one at 3-tech, but we'll see how that goes. The rest are mainly good depth, rotational players, with some having the potential to be more than that.
The list is long of players who had around 8 sacks and it was something to sneeze at.
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,573
Reaction score
3,440
Taco is now a hybrid. Base DE, interior rushman depth. I don't see him getting many rush snaps at DE, particularly if Gregory returns, which seems likely.

Quinn may be the pass rushing starting DE, but I expect he's not the base RDE. Probably Crawford.
You're not going to make alot of friends with that assumption on Crawford but I'm guessing you're correct!
 

DanA

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,964
Reaction score
5,781
Likely Replacements:
- Quinn in for Gregory
- Covington in for Ross

I think both changes are positives, Covington to me looks a better player than Ross. We might get something from Gregory but I'm going to learn from Irving last year and expect nothing.

Young Improvers:
Taco - 3rd-year player
Armstrong - 2nd-year player

I expect both these guys to improve. I know Taco has had surgery but the bar isn't all that high coming off last season, and he does have a lot of raw potential.

Rookies

Hill - 2nd Round
Jackson - 5th Round

Hill should be a significant player and a regular part of the rotation. Jackson has a fight on his hands with Kerry Hyder to make the roster.

Concerns:
Crawford - Potential suspension
Lawrence - Recovery from surgery
Wood - Recovery from surgery
Taco - Recovery from surgery


I'm pretty confident the rotation will be better overall but an early season might not be at full stride. If Crawford gets a suspension and our guys recovering from injury are slow to recover I'd expect a bit of difficulty. It should last past the first month or two though. By the post-season, if we make it, we should have one of the best D-lines in the league, particularly if Gregory is back.
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
Starters: Robert Quinn, Maliek Collins, Antwaun Woods, DeMarcus Lawrence
Contenders: Taco Charlton, Tyrone Crawford, Christian Covington, Dorance Armstrong, Kerry Hyder, Trysten Hill, Daniel Ross, Joe Jackson, Jalen Jelks, Shakir Soto, Daniel Wise, Ricky Walker, Randy Gregory

Almost everything Dallas was forced to do on the defensive line this offseason begins with two failures. Randy Gregory was suspended indefinitely in February, forcing Dallas to seek pass-rushing help at right end, and David Irving's love for everything but football reached its sad but inevitable conclusion. Both players have proven to this point to be a waste of very good talent.

After spending most of his career suspended, Gregory finally got to play for a season last year and began showing what kind of pass rusher he could be as the season progressed. It was the type that Dallas has been hoping that first-round pick Taco Charlton would become, but right now Charlton is just a rotational, bit player who doesn't add much as a pass rusher. Maybe he will change that in his third season, but Dallas isn't counting on it, first taking a flier on Kerry Hyder to try to mitigate the loss of Gregory. Hyder was a find for Detroit in 2016, providing eight sacks primarily as a reserve. However, he missed the 2017 season with a torn Achilles and then didn't do much his first year back from it (one sack in seven games).

If Hyder recovers his form, he adds a pass rusher who has some thickness that will allow him to rotate in at end on run downs or even play inside as a pass rusher on passing downs. However, the Cowboys can't exactly just count on Hyder returned to 2016 form, so the team traded for Robert Quinn. Quinn at this point in his career is probably a better pressure player than Gregory (although Gregory could have passed him this year with continued development). He was once a 19-sack player, but hasn't come close to that number the past four years because of injuries. Last year (his first with Miami) was the first time he did not get 10-plus sacks when he played all 16 games for a team. However, the tape shows that he wins a lot more battles than his 6.5 sacks last year reflect in both pass and run defense. He's an active player who teams have to consistently account for, which is what we need opposite DeMarcus Lawrence.

Lawrence, our $105 million man, has been our main disruptive player on the line the last couple of years. He consistently gets into the backfield even with teams giving him extra attentions. The Rams' whole game plan in the playoffs was to force someone else on the line to make plays and it didn't happen enough, which is one of the reasons we needed to improve the line. It's hard to be a one-man wrecking crew, but too often Lawrence had to be one because we had other players who came up big sometimes, but weren't consistent with it. Lawrence has ended up carrying too much of the burden the last two years to the point that where the defense usually went as he went.

While Quinn and Lawrence should be expected to receive the bulk of the snaps, Dallas likes to have a good rotation, so in addition to Hyder, Dorance Armstrong and possibly Tyrone Crawford should be expected to contribute at end. Armstrong showed good run play and pass rush potential in the preseason and will be given opportunities to build on that as a reserve. Crawford plugs in wherever he's needed, so if our run defense at right end isn't stout enough, he'll be back out there. If he's needed on the inside as a pass rusher, he'll be used there and provide steady but not spectacular results. He's not a player you want starting, but he's a player you have to start if no one more talented steps up or because others can't stay healthy.

We also added a couple of young players in the draft, Joe Jackson and Jalen Jelks, so this has become a crowded position, although position flex means some of the end candidates (Hyder, Crawford and probably Jackson) could end up with roles inside. Jackson had good college production at end, but his lack of a quick burst along with having pretty good size could result in a shift inside as a pass-rushing tackle. Jelks seems to be more of a project more likely to make the practice squad than stick on the 53 this year.

In addition to the three hybrids, Dallas made a couple other moves to make up for Irving being an idiot. First, after our run defense was gashed by the Rams, the Cowboys signed Christian Covington in free agency. Covington is a strong run defender, with a little pass rush ability, who we can line up next to Antwuan Woods on run downs. Woods was quite a find at 1-tech until injury affected his play in the playoffs. In addition to playing next to Woods in run defense, Covington will serve as the backup 1-tech.

How much Covington plays at 3-tech likely depends on two things: the health of Maliek Collins and the development of second-round pick Trysten Hill. Collins is not a great run defender despite his size, but he's OK at it while having enough quickness to his game to contribute some as a pass rusher. Hill looks like he could be better at both of those things because of great initial quickness along with some raw power. However, Hill is more the direct replacement for Irving both in terms of ability and concerns about character. If he'll take to coaching and allow his abilities to be directed properly, he could be a force. If he proves to be a malcontent when things don't go his way, then we still don't have the kind of 3-tech this defense needs.

A surprise at the position, though, could be Daniel Wise. He's more of a pass-rushing 3-tech than run-stopper, but does have some clear potential in that regard. So the good news is that we have a lot of players who could potentially make this line better than it was last year. The bad news is that we didn't add any players that we absolutely know will make the line better, although I do think Quinn and Covington are safe bets.

ROSTER PREDICTION: I'd like to keep 11, but I think 10 will be the limit. We've got four clear ends (Lawrence, Quinn, Charlton and Armstrong), three hybrids (Crawford, Hyder, Jackson) and four clear defensive tackles (Woods, Collins, Covington and Hill). I believe one of Charlton, Hyder and Jackson won't make the team. If Charlton doesn't step up this preseason, we could look to trade him at the end of camp to recoup any pick we could get. Hyder isn't being paid that much, so if he doesn't recover his form or others are simply as good or better, he could be the odd man out. Jackson is a late-round draft pick, so his fate, along with Wise's, could be a season on the practice squad. If Charlton, Hyder and Jackson all look great (or if Wise does instead of one of them), it could spell the end of Crawford's time on the roster because of his high salary.

My prediction is we will end up keeping Lawrence, Quinn, Charlton, Armstrong, Crawford, Hyder, Woods, Collins, Covington and Hill, with Jackson and Wise going on the PS. My hope is that Jackson or Wise play at least equal to Charlton and Crawford and we can trade Charlton and/or Crawford for picks or players at other positions.

Good post overall, but I disagree with some of the comments. IMO DT/NT is still the weakest position on the defense and trying to use a former DE to play NT is wishing for disaster late in the season. The strength of the defense is the LB corp. & having a true NT that can clog up running lanes will allow them play more freely and lineup for best coverage matchups. (For instance Smith or L.V.E can shift over to either side of the hash to pickup a RB like Kamara coming out of the backfield and get extra step instead of worrying about A run gap). There should be some good prospects for NT position to pickup once team starts trimming for 53 roster. Need to get a DT/NT similar to Haloti Ngata or Star Lotulelei.







 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
Good post overall, but I disagree with some of the comments. IMO DT/NT is still the weakest position on the defense and trying to use a former DE to play NT is wishing for disaster late in the season. The strength of the defense is the LB corp. & having a true NT that can clog up running lanes will allow them play more freely and lineup for best coverage matchups. (For instance Smith or L.V.E can shift over to either side of the hash to pickup a RB like Kamara coming out of the backfield and get extra step instead of worrying about A run gap). There should be some good prospects for NT position to pickup once team starts trimming for 53 roster. Need to get a DT/NT similar to Haloti Ngata or Star Lotulelei.

What former DE are we using to play NT? Woods is our starting NT and was very good at it when he was healthy, which he wasn't for the Rams game. Our backup NT is Covington, who did play DE in Houston's 3-4, but that is essentially the same as DT in a 4-3. He's 6-3, 310, so he's got good size for the position and is known as a good run-stopper.

Woods is a true NT, which is a two-down position (at most) in this defense. Covington can line up next to him on run downs to form a stronger front. I could understand the concern about the NT position last year before we found Woods, but I really don't understand concerns this year.

Now, I would like to have the type of NT who is stout against the run but can transition to pass rusher effectively, but it would probably take a first-round pick to get that type of player. Covington is closer to that type of player than Woods is, but Woods showed that he can handle that immovable object role that forces doubles and keeps the linebackers clean.

The concern this offseason should have been more about the other DT position, the 3-tech, because we simply weren't getting the type of disruption needed from that position. Irving had shown the potential to be that kind of player, but we all know how that turned out. Hill gives us the same kind of potential, both in regard to ability and possibly being a head case.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
Concerns:
Crawford - Potential suspension
Lawrence - Recovery from surgery
Wood - Recovery from surgery
Taco - Recovery from surgery


I'm pretty confident the rotation will be better overall but an early season might not be at full stride. If Crawford gets a suspension and our guys recovering from injury are slow to recover I'd expect a bit of difficulty. It should last past the first month or two though. By the post-season, if we make it, we should have one of the best D-lines in the league, particularly if Gregory is back.

I feel like our depth could definitely come into play if the suspension happens or those recoveries are slow.

Last year, we had players like Caraun Reid and Daniel Ross to step in at NT if Woods needed a break or was slowed by injury, so realistically, we had a drop-off there. Covington might not be much of a drop-off, if any.

Depending on where Hyder is in his comeback, he could be a big part of the answer if Crawford, Lawrence or Charlton miss time. He could play base end on the right side in a rotation with Quinn and receive whatever snaps Crawford would be getting at DT (if Hill doesn't snatch those) or he could start at left end with less of a drop-off that we might get from having to start Armstrong.

If all four of the ones you mentioned missed time, our base defense would look something like this:

Quinn, Collins, Covington, Hyder, with Hill coming in on passing downs and Armstrong subbing with the ends (which also could let Hyder play some inside to give Collins a break). In that case, Jackson and Ross probably also would be kept at least until the suspended/injured players return and could also contribute.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
The list is long of players who had around 8 sacks and it was something to sneeze at.

Last year, 33 players had eight or more sacks. Trey Flowers, who had 7.5, got a significant contract for his performance so apparently Detroit didn't consider it something to sneeze at. Eight sacks is very good production considering there are at least twice that many starting pass rushers (more if you want to count the pass-rushing DTs on the list). It's not a tell-all number because you also have to look at pressures, etc., but it's usually a pretty decent indicator that there is good production in those other areas as well.

It's important to also consider that Hyder got that production despite only starting two games in 2016.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
Totally agree, we have great numbers at DL but there is still plenty of question marks. I think Maliek Collins may be the biggest question (beyond Gregory of course), he might be a very good 3T that buys development time for Hill - but he has been injured as often as not.

The development of Armstrong and Taco should give us more production but you can't bank it. We could end up with a very good DL that goes 10 deep, or we may end up with 5 guys that we can really count on. You have to think the youth and numbers give us good odds however.

There are certainly plenty of questions, but it's really difficult to avoid having some at any position. The fact that we have so many potential answers makes me feel good about the DL. I won't feel great about it, though, until some of the questions are answered.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,366
Reaction score
102,293
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Lawrence had 5 sacks in the last 14 games.

Hyder's 8 sacks over 16 looks pretty good, particularly at the price. 2nd, 2nd, 1st, Tied for 1st, 1st for sacks for us the last 5 years.

Hyder seems like a nice tweener for us. Base RDE, DT pass rush. Maybe give us the option to move Crawford.

Jackson could really threaten Taco for base RDE snaps. Younger, cheaper, longer contract remaining. Also helps push Crawford to the bus stop.

I'm excited to see what Jackson might bring. His sack and tackles for loss numbers were consistently good during all three years at Miami. And he looks the part from a measurables perspective as well. Some say he's "slow", but his 40 time is much better than Taco's and slightly better than Lawrence's was. (4.77 vs 4.80)
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,399
Reaction score
47,279
Last year, 33 players had eight or more sacks. Trey Flowers, who had 7.5, got a significant contract for his performance so apparently Detroit didn't consider it something to sneeze at. Eight sacks is very good production considering there are at least twice that many starting pass rushers (more if you want to count the pass-rushing DTs on the list). It's not a tell-all number because you also have to look at pressures, etc., but it's usually a pretty decent indicator that there is good production in those other areas as well.

It's important to also consider that Hyder got that production despite only starting two games in 2016.
Very good production? Absolutely!!!!!

However, it's not a number that makes me think you can count on that player to be consistently disruptive. Selvie and Moore and Mincey all had around that number for us. Often what you'll see is a backup getting fairly high sack numbers due to them being the blitzer, the extra pass rusher that gets put in on passing downs. And you'll often see them have an open field toward the QB, which means you're not able to count on the player using his physical skillset to create pressure. So, it may or may not mean something. Victor Butler is a good example, though his high was 3 sacks. He was that extra rusher I'm referring to.

Good stuff, BTW.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
56,956
Reaction score
64,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Probably will be the same this year, if you're counting suspended players. Gregory most likely will miss the year and we'll keep 10 others.
So much depends on other positions and suspensions/PUP/IR designations.
10th DL
6th WR (7th on rare occasion)
9th/10th OL
7th LB
10th DB
4th TE
3rd RB (Olawale might be the 3rd "RB")
3rd QB

The Cowboys have become good at manipulating the roster.

Last year they cut veteran WR Thompson, then moved WR Brown to IR then re-signed Thompson.

Thompson was then a game 1 starter but when Brown was eligible to return from IR and they traded for Cooper, they cut Thompson to retain the comp pick.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
Very good production? Absolutely!!!!!

However, it's not a number that makes me think you can count on that player to be consistently disruptive. Selvie and Moore and Mincey all had around that number for us. Often what you'll see is a backup getting fairly high sack numbers due to them being the blitzer, the extra pass rusher that gets put in on passing downs. And you'll often see them have an open field toward the QB, which means you're not able to count on the player using his physical skillset to create pressure. So, it may or may not mean something. Victor Butler is a good example, though his high was 3 sacks. He was that extra rusher I'm referring to.

Good stuff, BTW.

We haven't had very many players who are consistently disruptive on the line, which is one reason we haven't been very good on defense for a lot of years. Lawrence is the only one we've had the past couple of seasons who I'd classify as consistently disruptive. Even when he's not making the sack, he either gets into the backfield to cause the QB to move or RB to alter his path or is subjected to double teams. Gregory was beginning to shows signs of being consistently disruptive, but wasn't quite there yet before his latest suspension.

From information I've seen on Quinn, it looks like he's also one of those players who consistently beats his man, either causing some disruption or the need for a double team. Hill looks like he's got that kind of ability if he can learn how to use it right. I think Hyder is the next-most disruptive player we have (right now) if he's anything close to his 2016 form. His disruption for the number of snaps he played was quite good, although I don't know if I'd put him in the consistently disruptive category.

Crawford and Collins are in the inconsistently disruptive category, while I have no idea where to place Covington at the moment (I think he'll fall into the same category). We have yet to see if Charlton and Armstrong are going to even get to that level in their careers and can't really classify younger players like Joe Jackson, who could be disruptive right off the bat or prove to not even be worthy of the pick that we spend, or Daniel Wise. Hill really falls into players we can't classify as well, even though I mentioned him with the disruptive group even though that's all just projection at this point.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
37,513
Reaction score
34,615
So much depends on other positions and suspensions/PUP/IR designations.
10th DL
6th WR (7th on rare occasion)
9th/10th OL
7th LB
10th DB
4th TE
3rd RB (Olawale might be the 3rd "RB")
3rd QB

The Cowboys have become good at manipulating the roster.

Last year they cut veteran WR Thompson, then moved WR Brown to IR then re-signed Thompson.

Thompson was then a game 1 starter but when Brown was eligible to return from IR and they traded for Cooper, they cut Thompson to retain the comp pick.

Yes. I've kind of laid out through these analysis my projection for the roster: 2 QBs, 4 RBs (including the fullback), 6 WRs, 3 TEs, 9 OL, 10 DL, 6 LBs, 10 DBs, 3 STs, but it's all subject to injuries, suspensions, performance, etc. Sometimes we're forced to go longer at a position than expected or shorter than expected. A good example of this is the Mike Weber situation. I had him making the roster as the third RB, but if his injury proves to be a setback, we might go with two true RBs and Olawale (we might choose to do that anyway, especially if Pollard looks like he can be an everydown back if needed for that role).

Then, there's the video circulating showing Elliott being placed in handcuffs. If he ends up being suspended, then we have to reassess the backfield, either bringing in a veteran for a few games or determining whether one of the backups can handle a few starts.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,751
Reaction score
20,829
I'm excited to see what Jackson might bring. His sack and tackles for loss numbers were consistently good during all three years at Miami. And he looks the part from a measurables perspective as well. Some say he's "slow", but his 40 time is much better than Taco's and slightly better than Lawrence's was. (4.77 vs 4.80)

4.77 will do. And he's supposed to come with NFL ready power. I think we need more base DE than pass rushers anyway, particularly long term.

But I'm going to restrain myself here. We've had a string of mid round DEs who have yet to amount to anything. Ryan Russell. Charles Tapper. Dorance Armstrong.
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,273
Reaction score
11,834
This should be the 2nd time Dallas has had a legit defense since 07-08. That's exciting even know the ceiling for this team isnt very high this season.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,366
Reaction score
102,293
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
4.77 will do. And he's supposed to come with NFL ready power. I think we need more base DE than pass rushers anyway, particularly long term.

But I'm going to restrain myself here. We've had a string of mid round DEs who have yet to amount to anything. Ryan Russell. Charles Tapper. Dorance Armstrong.

Me too. Ryan Russell always comes to mind when I think of these guys, and as you pointed out, there have been a few of them.
 
Top