Cowboys Red Zone Personnel (Multi-TE)

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,699
Reaction score
20,778
2018 Red Zone Personnel ( Team TDs with 2/3 TEs vs 0/1 TEs )
  • 2/3 TE 31 plays, 7 TD (23%)
  • 0/1 TE 127 plays, 22 TD (17 %)

Note: This includes playoff games.

Our TEs were a developmental squad last year. Those numbers look different with quality TEs. They should be better this year, but they're still our weakest position group on offense.

I am interested in seeing Hill play some FB. If you're gonna go jumbo, go with jumbo players, not 250 lb TEs.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
Our TEs were a developmental squad last year. Those numbers look different with quality TEs. They should be better this year, but they're still our weakest position group on offense.

I am interested in seeing Hill play some FB. If you're gonna go jumbo, go with jumbo players, not 250 lb TEs.


we know they screwed last season, but thats what the organization wants.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
Higher % of TDs due to goalline situations bringing in the extra TE. Not really sure what point you're getting at.
Not really sure in the point you're trying to illustrate either ,as the o.p. merely stated in the red zone, where the lesser number of ran plays with 2+ t.e. sets clearly produced a much high return percentage wise,which easily correlates into the terminology: efficiently effective


Yer' the one interjecting additional equations into the easily discernable intent of the thread,,,er,,, like goal-line,,,perhaps that's the reason being in yer' lack of conceptual grasp/ clarity,,, Broo_O
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,563
Reaction score
12,263
Higher % of TDs due to goalline situations bringing in the extra TE. Not really sure what point you're getting at.

I'd be careful comparing %s as you've got a small sample for 2/3 TE. These were likely mostly goalline situations as well
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,613
Reaction score
62,845
2018 Red Zone Personnel ( Team TDs with 2/3 TEs vs 0/1 TEs )
  • 2/3 TE 31 plays, 7 TD (23%)
  • 0/1 TE 127 plays, 22 TD (17 %)

Note: This includes playoff games.
You do know Dez was throwing shout outs to you all those years, right?

FakeOffensiveEel-size_restricted.gif
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
Not really sure in the point you're trying to illustrate either ,as the o.p. merely stated in the red zone, where the lesser number of ran plays with 2+ t.e. sets clearly produced a much high return percentage wise,which easily correlates into the terminology: efficiently effective


Yer' the one interjecting additional equations into the easily discernable intent of the thread,,,er,,, like goal-line,,,perhaps that's the reason being in yer' lack of conceptual grasp/ clarity,,, Broo_O

My point is you would expect a higher efficiency closer to the goal line... which is where you'll see more tight ends on the field.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
My point is you would expect a higher efficiency closer to the goal line... which is where you'll see more tight ends on the field.
I know my man, as it was clearly evident in the half way/50% hand drawn picture you'd posted up in the attempted dismantling of the O.P.'s implessively structured worded thread,,,Man,,, we were shamefully lame in our offensive red zone endeavors last season
( although,,,on the + side to this & the 2019 season, is that the #72 is pretty much stating that the year out of the trenches wasn't entirely for nought, as he's updated his footballish doctorate degree to professor level thru studious sideline learned observation time,thusly copping an entirely upgraded view in initial pre snap reads of the arrayed D & in reading thru the enemies currently employed camouflaged fronts)

*I like everybody that posts here,,,er,,,after having discounted Philadelphia Eagles under the wire sapper fan spines:starspin:
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
At least it's sterile...
:lmao: ,,,er,,,it's been known to seize up a scurrying cockroach in less than 10' of runaway/ hide travel distance after once having encountered is presence on the ground 3 days prior,,,:eek:



:lmao::yourock::lmao:
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
2018 Red Zone Personnel ( Team TDs with 2/3 TEs vs 0/1 TEs )
  • 2/3 TE 31 plays, 7 TD (23%)
  • 0/1 TE 127 plays, 22 TD (17 %)

Note: This includes playoff games.

Isn’t it much more likely that the “Jumbo” look would take place inside the 5 than on the 19? These are skewed stats.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
As are your posts.

You just have to watch football to know when you see 2 or 3 TE sets

Oh-ya?,,,
Perhaps you wish to venture forth into the arena of the ( off topic) deceased 1000 Philly fan genocide thread sometime,,,Mr. Brainiac of mastery,in the very first two letters of the phonic alphabet utilization of user handle,,, HUMMMMmmmmo_O
 
Top