Fair or not Agents use the pay of peers to help determine the market value.
Wentz was the number two overall pick and has been paid well up to this point. Dak was a 4th round pick and hasn't been adequately compensated. Fair or not his representation is going to "tax" us for that back pay performance. (I think it is owed)
Dak would be smart to take a 25-27 mil a year deal to help the team keep players around him. But I get it if he wants big BIG money now because he's owed.
Fact is: You can find the win/lost record of a QB on line. But you'll never find the win/lost record of a defensive back on line.By whom? Morons? If you want to be in that camp, then so be it.
Fact is: You can find the win/lost record of a QB on line. But you'll never find the win/lost record of a defensive back on line.
JUST STATING FACTS. a win/lost record is attached to every QB in the sport.
Your argument is not with me it's with the sport. But since you make such a valid point I'm sure the sport will stop attaching win/loss records to high school quarterbacks, to college quarterbacks, and to professional quarterbacks. Just cause you say so.Again, if you want to place yourself in a camp full of morons, then so be it. You willfully put yourself in that camp to justify your arguments, despite knowing it's poor.
However, anyone with a bit of sincerity and intelligence knows when you judge an individual player, you judge them by their performance, and then downplay the rest of what the team does to prop up a single player.
This argument is used for convenience and by absolute casual football fans you'd see posting on Facebook.
Your argument is not with me it's with the sport. But since you make such a valid point I'm sure the sport will stop attaching win/loss records to high school quarterbacks, to college quarterbacks, and to professional quarterbacks. Just cause you say so.
It is a 4 yr 128m extension. He didn’t sign a 6 year contract. 32 per year not 25 lmao
Wentz would’ve got more if he wasn’t injury prone.What’s the difference. It’s 4 years added to the 2 he was already under contract for. When you average out all 6 years, it comes to $25.8 per year. That should be the target for Dak as well. It certainly should not be above that when all years are averaged out.
By whom? Morons? If you want to be in that camp, then so be it.
I agree with this statement but if you believe this, then how does anybody justify 30 mil a year? I mean, the point is winning and not in the regular season but in Championships. That's really what the game is about in the NFL.
Wentz would’ve got more if he wasn’t injury prone.
If he was healthy he would’ve got a Russell WilsOn deal at least.I don’t think so. He got $32 million a year for the 4 new years. That’s top dollar. They don’t add money to the years already under contract. The player gets signing and roster bonuses in those years to help spread out the cap hits. I don’t see this as a hometown discount. He got top dollar. He just got it two years early so the per year average is lower than the new money average.
Does anyone truly believe anything or anyone can justify $30 million a year ? But the bottom line is you're worth whatever someone is willing to pay you......Would you or I turn down someone throwing money at us ?
I agree. I just don't see any team out there pay Dak anything more then 25 per. I am not even certain that it would be 25, considering Wentz's new deal. Seriously, I don't know who would do that.
Most fans and the media use that as their criteria....................However inaccurate you and I may view that as being , that hardly makes them "morons".......
Jerry will................Unfortunately..................
> Most fans
Most fans are casuals
> The media
What is "the media"? I don't go to ESPN talk shows for QB analysis, I go to in-depth statistical sites like PFF, Football Outsiders, etc. And yes, it does make them morons - if you completely ignore the surrounding players in a TEAM game (which is what we call a group of players, duh!), it makes you a moron.