Dak Prescott vs. Tony Romo

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I just don't get people that Think Romo could have come back and not got hurt again. If it wasn't for Dak we would have lost 2 whole seasons because of Tony's injuries. Any good defense would have knocked Tony down hard to get him out of the game.

In 2017 and 2018 Romo would be in a wheelchair right now with the way the Oline injuries kicked in these last two years. All the sacks? Romo would be in traction.

If health holds...……...THIS is the first year where I can actually say we have as good as talent as the top teams. Although our huge holes at safety might be a problem.
 

Blake

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,814
Reaction score
9,390
I just don't get people that Think Romo could have come back and not got hurt again. If it wasn't for Dak we would have lost 2 whole seasons because of Tony's injuries. Any good defense would have knocked Tony down hard to get him out of the game.

Denial and revisionism from this crowd. The truth was self-evident that Romo was made of glass and unreliable at that point.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
its only speculation because the idiots that ran this team refused to have an open competition. When Romo played in 2016 he went through the Eagles defense like a hot knife through butter even T. Williams looked good.

Its not "Loyalty" its simple Math. Have you seen a broadcast where Romo calls out the play before it happens? Could Dak do that? Would that Ability alone make Romo better then Dak? If Rpmo is better then Dak, does that not prove the Cowboys Would Have been a better team with Romo in the game and Dak on the bench.

Ok so stop with the BS and keep it
That's not what speculation means, you seem to be in denial. And that's ok, I just think some haven't the ability to let go of the past. There's zero factual evidence to suggest Romo would have done better just like there's none to prove he would do worse.

Now we're going by ONE drive? Lmao, come on, that proves nothing. He started at the 20!!!!
 

NotForLong

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,577
Reaction score
9,605
It’s just my opinion. Got nothing to do with Dak other than when a rookie can take a team to 13-3 and if they played the last game would have been 14-2 and go to the playoffs then it makes it easier to move on from a aging but great QB. They were going to have to find his replacement soon enough and Dak fell into there laps.

Do I think Romo would have made the team better than Dak in 2016. Yes, it could have been our year.

I agree a 100%

For me it wasn't just about that year.

I was excited when we drafted Dak and I was also looking to the future. The one thing I always believed in was for a QB to sit and watch and learn for at least a year.

I always felt that QB's floundered in the NFL when thrown in the fire because of the speed of the game caused them to improvise and develop Bad Habits. I believed it was more harmful to their development.

The Farve- Rodgers. Situation being Ideal. I was just as mad about Dak being thrown to the fire to early. I knew Romo had maybe 1 more year left and I wanted Dak to learn from him. . . .wasted opportunity
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
I just don't get people that Think Romo could have come back and not got hurt again. If it wasn't for Dak we would have lost 2 whole seasons because of Tony's injuries. Any good defense would have knocked Tony down hard to get him out of the game.
Another quack diagnosis from the PA Cowboy Troll. What, do you think he has osteoporosis? :laugh: You can go back into hiding now, troll.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,697
Reaction score
50,020
its only speculation because the idiots that ran this team refused to have an open competition. When Romo played in 2016 he went through the Eagles defense like a hot knife through butter even T. Williams looked good.

Its not "Loyalty" its simple Math. Have you seen a broadcast where Romo calls out the play before it happens? Could Dak do that? Would that Ability alone make Romo better then Dak? If Rpmo is better then Dak, does that not prove the Cowboys Would Have been a better team with Romo in the game and Dak on the bench.

Ok so stop with the BS and keep it
Nothing but an exhibition game and they got Tony out fast before he could get hit
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,998
Reaction score
29,874
I agree a 100%

For me it wasn't just about that year.

I was excited when we drafted Dak and I was also looking to the future. The one thing I always believed in was for a QB to sit and watch and learn for at least a year.

I always felt that QB's floundered in the NFL when thrown in the fire because of the speed of the game caused them to improvise and develop Bad Habits. I believed it was more harmful to their development.

The Farve- Rodgers. Situation being Ideal. I was just as mad about Dak being thrown to the fire to early. I knew Romo had maybe 1 more year left and I wanted Dak to learn from him. . . .wasted opportunity
I agree. We got lucky with Dak. But I often wonder, with a team we had built that enabled a rookie QB and RB to do that kind of damage in the NFL, what if Romo would have been healthy that year. Even with a Defense that wasn’t up to snuff.

Dak is used to pressure from college, he played the bigger schools and is a gamer. That’s part of what is making him successful in the NFL. He will do just fine for us as he develops. I miss Romo but honestly we all knew it was coming to the end faster than we or he wanted it to.
 

csirl

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
4,006
How about a Dak Prescott v Jim Thorpe thread?

Thorpe won more Olympic medals than Dak..... ..
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
58,407
Reaction score
55,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
vZQGFtc.png
 

Northern_Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
3,815
I just don't get people that Think Romo could have come back and not got hurt again. If it wasn't for Dak we would have lost 2 whole seasons because of Tony's injuries. Any good defense would have knocked Tony down hard to get him out of the game.

You may be correct but i don't think that is the point. If you are trying to win you play your best players and Romo was the better QB, Now Tony wanted to play so he knew the risks so you go with him until he can't go anymore, be it one game, ten games or 1 quarter. You play your best players if they can play, at least that's the way i look at it
 

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,305
Reaction score
17,070
The difference here is that Dak more often than not isn't going to make the back breaking mistake that ends up losing your the game. Tony more often than not did that. Now we can say that he was doing it all by himself and he didn't have anyone, but that was his failing even towards the end.
 

Blackrain

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,587
Reaction score
9,199
I just don't get people that Think Romo could have come back and not got hurt again. If it wasn't for Dak we would have lost 2 whole seasons because of Tony's injuries. Any good defense would have knocked Tony down hard to get him out of the game.

I hear you brother ,I just think many were so emotionally invested in Tony that when he wasn't let back they basically went ballistic and were not looking at the real danger to his health and future . They wanted every last minute out of his career and would not settle for less . They developed an animosity towards Dak like he had control over the decision and it has festered and manifested itself into a very illogical hatred.

Many did everything they could to justify that he could still play and he could till the first hit . If it was 2 hand touch Tony would have been in but many of us knew that when he could no longer practice on Wednesdays it was the beginning of the end .

You are 100% correct teams would have targeted him and taken the penalty to remove him from the game and the season .
 

Blackrain

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,587
Reaction score
9,199
Another quack diagnosis from the PA Cowboy Troll. What, do you think he has osteoporosis? :laugh: You can go back into hiding now, troll.
Tony has good enough sense to know he is unable to take NFL hits that's why he is in the booth while his BFF is coming out of retirement . If his back would take it he would be starting for someone right now . There is no way Wittens competitive desire to win a Championship is greater than Tony . He would flatout be playing if he could .
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Tony has good enough sense to know he is unable to take NFL hits that's why he is in the booth while his BFF is coming out of retirement . If his back would take it he would be starting for someone right now . There is no way Wittens competitive desire to win a Championship is greater than Tony . He would flatout be playing if he could .
First of all, he's 39 years old... even if he'd never been injured a day of his life, the odds are overwhelming that he would be retired by now. The number of QBs in NFL history who played at age 39 is extremely small.
Second, none of his injuries that he sustained that were causing him to miss tons of games were anything but broken bones. Broken bones aren't a chronic condition. They heal and then that's it. Now if he felt that he was slowing down and couldn't get out of harm's way that's a different story... and has nothing to do with if his "back would take it".
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
58,407
Reaction score
55,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It has been three years and a contradiction remains unacknowledged by those who claim none exists.

Jones and Garrett denied Romo the opportunity to reclaim the starting job as the team headed into the postseason.

Romo's health is repeatedly stated as Jones and Garrett's partial (sometimes said as sole) reasoning for what they did. Both men did what they did to "remove any chance of Romo suffering another injury that would result in highly probable paralysis."

Yet

The team's head coach and highly invasively influential general manager, two men who effectively ended Romo's career in Dallas with their decision, allowed Romo to take the field against the Eagles afterwards.

In a regular season game.

In a National Football League game.

Against an opponent who not only had some degree of animosity towards the Cowboys franchise but also did not share any degree of compassion for Prescott's long-time predecessor. Neither Jones nor Garrett could be manhandled by Romo's desire to play one last time (that much cannot be argued by anyone), especially if their greatest concern was keeping Romo from becoming a quadriplegic.

Regardless, Romo "talked" Jones and Garrett into letting him play--the exact same two men he could not talk into letting him play.

Maybe both men made some non public agreement with the Eagles to not lay a finger on Romo. Perhaps they foresaw all the Eagles' defensive backups' hearts swell with empathy and knew without any doubt none would want to crack Romo's severely degenerative back (his medical records were blasted throughout the internet/everybody knew his physical condition/still do) like an egg. They were 100% positive Romo would live to see Candice and the kids while standing on his own two feet later that day and not from an intensive care unit bed unable to wiggle his toes.

Yes. The logical rationalization is two men, who cared for Romo more than a son or brother, allowed him to step on the field one last time, to play a possession in one of the most physically demanding professional team sports in the world, against a franchise whose fans infamously laughed like adolescents as Irvin laid sprawled hurt on the field, where tens of thousands of injuries have occurred over the course of NFL history in the blink of an eye.

Makes perfect sense. To some.

Go Cowboys.
 

Northern_Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
3,815
It has been three years and a contradiction remains unacknowledged by those who claim none exists.

Jones and Garrett denied Romo the opportunity to reclaim the starting job as the team headed into the postseason.

Romo's health is repeatedly stated as Jones and Garrett's partial (sometimes said as sole) reasoning for what they did. Both men did what they did to "remove any chance of Romo suffering another injury that would result in highly probable paralysis."

Yet

The team's head coach and highly invasively influential general manager, two men who effectively ended Romo's career in Dallas with their decision, allowed Romo to take the field against the Eagles afterwards.

In a regular season game.

In a National Football League game.

Against an opponent who not only had some degree of animosity towards the Cowboys franchise but also did not share any degree of compassion for Prescott's long-time predecessor. Neither Jones nor Garrett could be manhandled by Romo's desire to play one last time (that much cannot be argued by anyone), especially if their greatest concern was keeping Romo from becoming a quadriplegic.

Regardless, Romo "talked" Jones and Garrett into letting him play--the exact same two men he could not talk into letting him play.

Maybe both men made some non public agreement with the Eagles to not lay a finger on Romo. Perhaps they foresaw all the Eagles' defensive backups' hearts swell with empathy and knew without any doubt none would want to crack Romo's severely degenerative back (his medical records were blasted throughout the internet/everybody knew his physical condition/still do) like an egg. They were 100% positive Romo would live to see Candice and the kids while standing on his own two feet later that day and not from an intensive care unit bed unable to wiggle his toes.

Yes. The logical rationalization is two men, who cared for Romo more than a son or brother, allowed him to step on the field one last time, to play a possession in one of the most physically demanding professional team sports in the world, against a franchise whose fans infamously laughed like adolescents as Irvin laid sprawled hurt on the field, where tens of thousands of injuries have occurred over the course of NFL history in the blink of an eye.

Makes perfect sense. To some.

Go Cowboys.

If any of this were even remotely true then what could have been the rational for Jones and Garrett to keep Romo as the backup QB? I mean if Dak got hurt wouldn't they have had to put Romo in the game, thus putting him in a position to hurt his back which would result in the "probable paralysis" you talk about....LOL. The Cowboys went with Dak out of a pure money aspect knowing or believing they had found the next guy and now would have a cheaper way to get out of Romo's deal while Dak was on a 4th round rookie deal, they were not concerned about Romo's health in any sort of way, especially if he had been cleared by Doctors to play. Becoming a quadrapalegic was not even in their thought process because if it was he would not have been the backup QB...c'mon man
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,751
Reaction score
20,827
He did, but they released him. Then CBS offered him $5 million a year to be the No. 1 color guy with Jim Nantz. He's proving to be just as good at that as he was a QB. In fact, he just renegotiated his CBS deal for twice the pay.

Beautiful family, two young kids, $150 million the bank, perfect job offer, don't have to move to a different city, broken body via Jerry....pretty easy decision.

I hadn't heard about Tony doubling his pay. Good for him.

Though it's not a surprise. People will actually watch a game to hear Tony announce it. Much like his playing days, Tony is one of the best things the NFL has going.
 
Top