can that be substantiate?
swapping one notion for another doesn't move the needle
describing the coaching staff as A vs B, and JJ taking sides is kinda Jr high thinking
I just don't believe any FO would groom an OC (or DC) for 3 years if the HC (and QB) didn't sign off on it, if not suggest it.
Except I didn't state it as fact as the OP did. I asked a question about a thread on the forum that I remember reading about. I'm not the one utilizing junior high tactics by turning things around. "Can you prove he said that?" "Can you prove he didn't?" Isn't a valid argument if you're the one making the original claim.
I'm not sure why that tactic is something you're defending. Rockport made an error in how he presented things and got called on it and didn't like it.
You don't believe that the FO would do something the HC didn't sign off on? But according to the OP, the HC wanted Linehan gone last year. Why was he still here then? Why did the FO hire the OC before the HC back in 2007? That's something a HC should sign off on. This FO doesn't work like a lot of other ones do.
Jerry has been quoted as saying that he wants fresh ideas and if they're not being implemented, call him. Now why would he say that and who wouldn't be implementing them? There's only one guy that can overrule Kellen on the sidelines that isn't Stephen or Jerry.
I don't claim to know for sure anything. I can only speculate based on what people in the organization has stated. I don't state my thoughts on that as fact as some do. That's juvenile, as is defending it. Good day to you, sir.