NFL bias against the Cowboys

GenoT

GenoT

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,985
Reaction score
8,739
J12B said:
Cowboys cut WR Hurns, who broke leg in playoffs

That's the headline on nfl.com

Trying to get more hate against the cowboys organization.

Media bias is disgusting.

Hurns was already very unlikely to return on a 6 million cap hit because of low production throughout the year after being given a starting role.
Click to expand...
:muttley::facepalm:

Your “special helmet” obviously needs another layer of tinfoil, pal.
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
J12B said:
Cowboys cut WR Hurns, who broke leg in playoffs

That's the headline on nfl.com

Trying to get more hate against the cowboys organization.

Media bias is disgusting.

Hurns was already very unlikely to return on a 6 million cap hit because of low production throughout the year after being given a starting role.
Click to expand...
Congratulations you're trolling yourself.
 
J12B

J12B

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,236
Reaction score
22,252
WillieBeamen said:
:facepalm: Yall complain about EVERYTHING
Click to expand...
Swanny said:
Don't see the issue. It's all facts
Click to expand...
Tabascocat said:
What’s not true there? :huh:
Click to expand...
Seven said:
The truth is bias, now?

Jesus...........
Click to expand...
stasheroo said:
Some fans just look for things to get offended about...
:facepalm:
Click to expand...

Had Hurns had a decent year, he would not have been released. It sounds like he has made a quick and near full recovery after that brutal injury.

His broken leg had nothing to do with his release, yet it is being made to appear that way because it will create more negative attention to the Cowboys as an organization.

I guarantee that a huge majority of fans and comments will be calling Dallas trash because of this move.

The fact is Hurns was released because he had a high cap hit relative to his production last year and there is depth at the position. Not because of a broken leg.
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
J12B said:
Had Hurns had a decent year, he would not have been released. It sounds like he has made a quick and near full recovery after that brutal injury.

His broken leg had nothing to do with his release, yet it is being made to appear that way because it will create more negative attention to the Cowboys as an organization.

I guarantee that a huge majority of fans and comments will be calling Dallas trash because of this move.

The fact is Hurns was released because he had a high cap hit relative to his production last year and there is depth at the position. Not because of a broken leg.
Click to expand...
Did you read the article? It in no way insinuates he was released because of the injury.
 
J12B

J12B

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,236
Reaction score
22,252
408Cowboy said:
Did you read the article? It in no way insinuates he was released because of the injury.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I did. But my point was the headline. There was no need to bring up breaking his leg in the playoffs.

And you're right, the article does not insinuate that his release because of his leg...so why have it in the headline?

Problem is a lot of people only read headlines.
 
Last edited:

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
J12B said:
Yeah, I did. But my point was the headline. There was no need to bring up breaking his leg in the playoffs.

And you're right, the article does not insinuate that his release because of his leg...so why have it in the headline?

Problem is a lot of people only read headlines.
Click to expand...
The headline states two facts. That's it.
 
Blackspider214

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,664
Reaction score
15,496
I mean I see what you are saying but you are off base and reaching. Both of those statements are factual. Hurns injury was pretty nasty. We just didn't feel the need to keep him on the 53 this season coming up. Happens all the time with every single time.
 
glimmerman

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,995
Reaction score
29,865
They wanted him to take a pay cut. He didn’t want to and wanted to check the market.
 
Swanny

Swanny

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,515
Reaction score
3,266
J12B said:
Had Hurns had a decent year, he would not have been released. It sounds like he has made a quick and near full recovery after that brutal injury.

His broken leg had nothing to do with his release, yet it is being made to appear that way because it will create more negative attention to the Cowboys as an organization.

I guarantee that a huge majority of fans and comments will be calling Dallas trash because of this move.

The fact is Hurns was released because he had a high cap hit relative to his production last year and there is depth at the position. Not because of a broken leg.
Click to expand...
I agree he was released because of the cap hit. But I still don't see the issue with the headline. I see or understand why you are thinking the way you are but I just don't see it as a big deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top