Would Pederson give us a better chance at the SB instead of Garrett?

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,173
Reaction score
69,132
Peterson won a Super Bowl over Tom Brady and Bill Belicheat!! Enough said!! Of course Peterson would give us a better chance to win a Super Bowl then Garrett. This team wins inspite of Garrett! We, as usual, have top 5 talent, with average to below average coaching.
So what happened last year or two years ago? I don’t want either coach honestly.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,173
Reaction score
69,132
Really? Let's see...the last six games of the season, after the Saints blew them out with no secondary left, Philly patched up their defense with guys literally coming off the street. With six games left and playoff hopes on the line, they went 5-1, with a "gimmicky" offense scoring around 26-27 points a game..oh, beating the Rams along the way, something we couldn't do when it counted. They even won a playoff game against a higher seeded opponent with their injured roster.
They were a game away from missing the playoffs. But ok. Is Your argument that they were better than the Cowboys last season?
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,692
Reaction score
91,137
So did Tom Coughlin and the Giants, who fell on their faces in subsequent years and Coughlin got fired.

Time will tell if Pederson is the real deal or if 2017 was a fluke.

The Giants were probably stupid to fire Coughlin given what they replaced him with. The fact is Coughlin was a really good head coach and likely a candidate for the Hall of Fame. His resume dwarfs Garrett's in almost every way possible.

And even if 2017 was a "fluke" for Pederson, he still had one good season. Garrett has had zero in 9.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,499
Reaction score
4,387
Having an interesting conversation with a few Eagle fans. They think that the best two NFC teams in terms of talent are our Boys and the Eagles. Two of them believe that if Pederson was our HC instead of Garrett that we would be Super Bowl winners. Their reasoning:

1) Pederson has been able to keep a badly injured team competitive due to adjustments made in game--they don't always win (we beat them twice last year) but they rarely get blown out and keep it close.
2) Pederson has shown that he is willing to change the system to fit the players better than Garrett has shown.
3) Pederson simply makes better in game adjustments. He puts his players in a better position to win.
4) Dallas might have the best personnel on paper. They should have more playoff success than they do. That points to coaching.

Both the past two years, the Eagles have been hit hard with injuries--I think only the Commanders have been hit harder on the injury front. During the Super Bowl year, Pederson looked at old game footage of Foles under Kelly when he had that 27/2 year. Pederson took what worked under Kelly and incorporated it into his offense for Foles. Result: Super Bowl victory.

So, would Pederson have a better chance to lead us back to Lombardi heaven over Garrett?
My 13 year old son if allowed by Head Coach Jerry Jones to coach would give us a better chance. He would come to me for advice. So they can win a Super Bowl with my son, Tomlin, Pederson, Reid, Belichick, Payton, Gruden, Arians, Flores, McVay, Lynn, and you can throw in the Kitchens.
 

dckid

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,763
Reaction score
2,478
Having an interesting conversation with a few Eagle fans. They think that the best two NFC teams in terms of talent are our Boys and the Eagles. Two of them believe that if Pederson was our HC instead of Garrett that we would be Super Bowl winners. Their reasoning:

1) Pederson has been able to keep a badly injured team competitive due to adjustments made in game--they don't always win (we beat them twice last year) but they rarely get blown out and keep it close.
2) Pederson has shown that he is willing to change the system to fit the players better than Garrett has shown.
3) Pederson simply makes better in game adjustments. He puts his players in a better position to win.
4) Dallas might have the best personnel on paper. They should have more playoff success than they do. That points to coaching.

Both the past two years, the Eagles have been hit hard with injuries--I think only the Commanders have been hit harder on the injury front. During the Super Bowl year, Pederson looked at old game footage of Foles under Kelly when he had that 27/2 year. Pederson took what worked under Kelly and incorporated it into his offense for Foles. Result: Super Bowl victory.

So, would Pederson have a better chance to lead us back to Lombardi heaven over Garrett?
Thanks for the breakdown, but why is this even a question?
JG is terrible, he would have been fired by almost any other organization other than Dallas. What does he do other than spit, slap backsides, push his players when they are walking back on the field?
He doesn't coach O,D or ST, doesn't know how to manage the game. He loves 48 + yd FG tries. My 6 year old knows we run 50 gut 80 percent of the time on 1st down. He does not use play action.
I think his headphone is tuned into the oldies station. How many times does he have a deer in the headlights look on his face.
He builds a culture of mediocrity.
 

StarOfGlory

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,957
Reaction score
4,250
They were a game away from missing the playoffs. But ok. Is Your argument that they were better than the Cowboys last season?
Reading is fundamental. Nowhere in my post did I say or hint that. I clearly acknowledged the two victories we had over them. I guess you missed that part.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,173
Reaction score
69,132
Reading is fundamental. Nowhere in my post did I say or hint that. I clearly acknowledged the two victories we had over them. I guess you missed that part.
I guess reading is fundamental because I asked you a simple question. What’s your point? What’s your argument?
 

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
8,479
Reaction score
23,487
Having an interesting conversation with a few Eagle fans. They think that the best two NFC teams in terms of talent are our Boys and the Eagles. Two of them believe that if Pederson was our HC instead of Garrett that we would be Super Bowl winners. Their reasoning:

1) Pederson has been able to keep a badly injured team competitive due to adjustments made in game--they don't always win (we beat them twice last year) but they rarely get blown out and keep it close.
2) Pederson has shown that he is willing to change the system to fit the players better than Garrett has shown.
3) Pederson simply makes better in game adjustments. He puts his players in a better position to win.
4) Dallas might have the best personnel on paper. They should have more playoff success than they do. That points to coaching.

Both the past two years, the Eagles have been hit hard with injuries--I think only the Commanders have been hit harder on the injury front. During the Super Bowl year, Pederson looked at old game footage of Foles under Kelly when he had that 27/2 year. Pederson took what worked under Kelly and incorporated it into his offense for Foles. Result: Super Bowl victory.

So, would Pederson have a better chance to lead us back to Lombardi heaven over Garrett?

What a dumb question. Peewee Herman as HC would give them a better chance at a SB.
 
Top