its not the same thing. you are comparing ability to buy a 32 ft yacht, vs. 38 ft yacht....vs. eating and having a roof over your head and not having one.This is to all the posters who want players to take a pay cut.
If your boss came up to you and said would you take a $4 an hour pay cut so he can hire a couple extra employees so that more work could get done more efficiently. But if you don't take a pay cut they will have to lay off a few employees. So who's taking that pay cut?
I understand some make less then others but I know some here make good money. So who's taking the pay cut?
This is for all the posters who want players to take a pay cuts for the greater good of the team, the same team that will eventually cut you to save money.
Exactly. I would feel A LOT differently if Jerry was trying NOT to spend all of the salary cap. But he doesn't. He tries his best to put it all on the field.Sounds like the type of administrator teacher's love.
Our Supe did the same. Our district went through some tough times years ago. Teachers were in danger of being let go, we were all in a salary freeze (even though insurance was going up), and he was due a raise. He actually took less like you did....he understood that was how to have the BEST TEAM for the kids.
Jerry is no different. In reality, he could make a HUGE push for the NFL getting rid of the cap. Shoot. The Cowboys would dominate the market and FA. But he realizes the NFL is a team. The salary cap has enabled the NFL to become a huge juggernaut.
I don't think it's out of line for him to ask players to take less of a raise to build a better team. That's what he's done. If there was no salary cap, there's no doubt that Jerry would pay each player what they feel they deserve. He's not being cheap....he's being smart with the rules.
I've done it before. Sometimes a job is more important than the money.
Nope but threatening to sit out is the same thing.Ummm. He didn't quit his job
/thread
he definitely has leverage,he knows our whole offense revolves around him,Jerry needs to take blame for drafting a RB so high but he wont make that mistake again.
its not the same thing. you are comparing ability to buy a 32 ft yacht, vs. 38 ft yacht....vs. eating and having a roof over your head and not having one.
there is a living, improving quality life wage, and then there is having additional 0's in your savings account.
so you can't compare that and its not a good example.
however, the difference between 30 mil a year, vs. 32 mill a year is not significant when you are at that level. there is also opportunities to make additional money, outside of football, which they all do.
so the question is if you can afford everything. if you can get anything you want. if you are set for life. what else can you get or not get? and as an athlete, that's championships. You can't buy that, even if you made 40 mill a year. but given the rules today, a cap, if you take the money, and push for the money, then there won't be room to have other players that can help you win championships. that's why brady became the goat. he is taking below market value, but he has 6 rings... and his name is forever etched in history.
This is to all the posters who want players to take a pay cut.
If your boss came up to you and said would you take a $4 an hour pay cut so he can hire a couple extra employees so that more work could get done more efficiently. But if you don't take a pay cut they will have to lay off a few employees. So who's taking that pay cut?
I understand some make less then others but I know some here make good money. So who's taking the pay cut?
This is for all the posters who want players to take a pay cuts for the greater good of the team, the same team that will eventually cut you to save money.
I'm pro player when it comes to contracts. They're in the 1 percent of the 1 percent of the population who can perform this game at this level, and deserve their share of the enormous revenue pie that the sport brings in.
But as it specifically relates to our trio, here are my thoughts:
1) Cooper is wise to try to maximize his contract demands by putting forth a huge 2019 season. He can't command nearly what he wants based on his current career statistics, in my opinion. I don't see Cooper giving the Cowboys a discount, nor do I really think he owes us one.
2) Zeke is wise to demand more money now because he's a depreciating asset. A monster 1,700-yard season could theoretically lessen his worth. He's no different than a new car driven off the lot. However -- and this is a big however -- I think he owes the Jones family for the way they've stood by him. This guy has been just short of a complete disaster off the field. It's rather amazing, not to mention disappointing, that that seems to be forgotten now that it's time to redo his contract.
3) Dak has waited his turn and has spent 3+ seasons being paid well below the level of a high-caliber starting QB. But I think he's being extremely shortsighted if his reported demands are accurate. Let's be real, Dak's value is in his ability to win and lead. In my opinion he's wiser to leave a few million on the table in hopes that that money will be turned toward a better roster, than bleeding every penny from the Cowboys now and risking a deteriorating roster. Because I don't see Dak getting a second contract from the franchise if the latter scenario plays out. Where as he could have long, lucrative career here if the talent around him remains at an acceptable level.
Absolutely agree. Both are freaks.Compare that roster with the Cowboys roster....
Zeke
Cooper
Frederick
Smith
Martin
LVE
Jones
Lawerence
Smith
Lee
Just as talented. You want to know what the major difference is? QB and Head Coach...
I mentioned this in another thread.
I took less money so that others in my district could make more. I was the superintendent in a small school district in Texas. Definitely making less than the big districts, but still well over 100 a year. I turned down raises several times during the 12 years I was superintendent...including the year I was superintendent of the year for my region. I am absolutely sure I could have added another 20-30% to my salary my last couple of years and more prior to that. It allowed my to keep my Ag teacher who became President of the Texas FFA teacher's association. It allowed me to keep my head coach who became the president of the Texas 6-man Coach's Association. It allowed me to give everyone who had been there 30+ years a 25% pay increase. It allowed me to do things like provide ALL the school supplies for the kids...every sheet of paper...every pencil...every book...even the dual credit course tuition. I retired last October and left behind a financially stable and strong academic district with home-grown leadership to replace me.
If these guys all want top money they are going to sacrifice having a strong team. And when they are already guaranteed money that will secure their family for generations...it makes no sense to me. I know for a fact I wouldn't make the same choice.
Once again, if there is one person in the NFL who should not leave a penny on the table...it is one that was the 77th highest paid QB in the NFL last year. Dak should not take one penny below market rate (whatever that is). Period. End. of. Discussion.
I remember a few years ago Drew Brees holding out for more money from the Saints. Matt Stafford, Andrew Luck, and Kirk Cousins have never ever left a penny on the table. Tony Romo was paid market value and not a penny less...so was Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, and Big Ben.
To ask the guy that made less than Stafford and the like made in one quarter to take a team friendly deal is a non-starter. Period. End. of. Discussion.
I see your point in this but this is not a fair question. It's not fair because NFL players are on a team playing for one goal. If that goal is reached then it may open the doors for everyone on the team to make more money either through endorsements, speaking engagements, radio shows, etc. If I'm a factory worker and my boss asks me to take a 4 dollar an hour pay cut so he can hire more workers to have more productivity. I would say no without thinking. Now in the same scenario my boss asks me the same question but drops in the nugget that with more production our factory has a chance to he the best in the world and at the end of the year if our production is the best than every employee in the factory would get a bonus, national recognition, and other things that would beef up my resume so I could gain extra income outside of the factory for several years and also collect the same paycheck for my work in the factory; I would say yes to that in a heartbeat.This is to all the posters who want players to take a pay cut.
If your boss came up to you and said would you take a $4 an hour pay cut so he can hire a couple extra employees so that more work could get done more efficiently. But if you don't take a pay cut they will have to lay off a few employees. So who's taking that pay cut?
I understand some make less then others but I know some here make good money. So who's taking the pay cut?
This is for all the posters who want players to take a pay cuts for the greater good of the team, the same team that will eventually cut you to save money.
Nicely done.I see your point in this but this is not a fair question. It's not fair because NFL players are on a team playing for one goal. If that goal is reached then it may open the doors for everyone on the team to make more money either through endorsements, speaking engagements, radio shows, etc. If I'm a factory worker and my boss asks me to take a 4 dollar an hour pay cut so he can hire more workers to have more productivity. I would say no without thinking. Now in the same scenario my boss asks me the same question but drops in the nugget that with more production our factory has a chance to he the best in the world and at the end of the year if our production is the best than every employee in the factory would get a bonus, national recognition, and other things that would beef up my resume so I could gain extra income outside of the factory for several years and also collect the same paycheck for my work in the factory; I would say yes to that in a heartbeat.
If Dak, Zeke, and Coop win a super bowl it would create opportunities for endorsements, commercials, movie roles ( cameos at least), radio shows, and social media that would earn them more money than they give up by taking less on a contract. Especially Dak, he would have so many endorsement opportunities it wouldn't be funny.
ThanksNicely done.
I worked for a Board of Directors who offered me a raise. I asked them to give it to an underpaid employee, who I needed to keep, instead of me. So, I would and have.This is to all the posters who want players to take a pay cut.
If your boss came up to you and said would you take a $4 an hour pay cut so he can hire a couple extra employees so that more work could get done more efficiently. But if you don't take a pay cut they will have to lay off a few employees. So who's taking that pay cut?
I understand some make less then others but I know some here make good money. So who's taking the pay cut?
This is for all the posters who want players to take a pay cuts for the greater good of the team, the same team that will eventually cut you to save money.