You may have missed it in your faux outrage but the point I was making was that this FO has not prioritized the back up qb posit and hence, the back up QBs last 2 years are part of the evidence
Not my fault that you came in the middle of the discussion
But please carry
My faux outrage? lol. You have a flair for melodrama, don't you? Hell, I specifically said it's okay for reasonable people to disagree on this, but I guess it somehow behoove you to ignore that and come up with this "faux outrage" silliness.
As for the past 2 years, again, my comments referred to the current situation at backup QB, and talking about the past doesn't alter what I said about the present.
But if you want me to talk also talk about the past 2 years, I don't mind doing that too. My thoughts on 2017 are pretty much the same as yours - they didn't put serious effort into improving the backup QB position. Fortunately Rush looked very good in preseason in 2017, but that doesn't alter the fact that Rush was far from a serious effort at improvement. But since he did look good in 2017, going into 2018 they had the hope of him continuing to improve with a year behind him, and despite that, they also drafted another QB. Accordingly, it's pretty hard to argue that they weren't making an effort to improve the depth at QB in 2018.
Of course, none of that really matters now. What matters now is where things stand now. I can't condemn Rush in 2019 because I didn't like the effort the Cowboys put into finding a QB in 2017.