News: What does the La’el Collins contract extension tell us about the future of the Dallas Cowboys?

zekecowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,927
Reaction score
2,233
Maybe the health of the offensive line is a little more concerning that we realize
Tyron Smith is dealing with a bad back. Sure, he’s only 28-years-old, but let’s not forget that he’s been in the league since he was 20, so he’s put a lot of mileage on that body. Eight years spent with the league’s most powerful edge rushers pound on you can be very jarring on that back. He has missed three games in each of the last three seasons, and it wouldn’t shock anyone if he misses time again this season. The Cowboys are already mindful of that, which is why swing tackle Cameron Fleming received the second-biggest contract of any of their free agent signings this offseason.

If the team has concerns about Smith’s health, they could be leaving the door open for a possible exit strategy. Even though Smith does have five years left on his contract, his dead money hit drops to $5.2 M after this season and just $1.7 M the year after that.

Nobody wants to think about life without Smith, but if you look at all the recent decisions the team has made regarding the offensive line, something’s a bit askew. The team went super heavy at offensive line for their final roster, including hanging on to undrafted free agent Brandon Knight, who just so happens to be able to play tackle. And one of their practice squad players is UDFA Mitch Hyatt. The team is making sure they have tackle depth.

Maybe the decision to keep Collins has nothing to do with Smith specifically, but just the collective concern of their star linemen in general. Zack Martin is also dealing with a back issue. His was bad enough that he was shelved for training camp to allow him more time to heal. Should Martin become unavailable, that means they would need to call on that interior line depth to help out. That could foil their chance to move Connor Williams outside to cover for La’el if Williams is needed inside. Keeping Collins on the roster means they’d no longer have to worry about moving Williams, who will hopefully show great improvement at the left guard position this year. Securing their talent along the offensive line is great, but doesn’t it comes with a cost?


https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ell-us-about-the-future-of-the-dallas-cowboys
 

Altestic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
780
Get Maliek Collins signed (6-8m AAV, five years) and Antwaun Woods (should only be 3m AAV, 3-4 years) and we're fine after that. I'm ok with losing Byron Jones and Anthony Brown (a jag) next year. That position is much more replaceable than OL and DL. The best way to win in the NFL is with a strong OL and DL.
 

Einstein

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
1,338
It tells me that we are set on the OL as far as contracts go for a while, and they are mostly team friendly. There is a reason other teams were calling us about our OL depth.
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
Fleming is a $4.5m savings next year if released.

Wouldn't be surprised to see CWill taking snaps at RT next camp to see if he's competent, while competing at LG. If he wins LG and can play RT well enough, he'll slide out if Collins misses time. McGovern would be LG, C, RG depth with possibly Looney and whoever else in that case.

Cap isn't going to be that big a problem. Dallas wants to secure the OL with talent, with a young Dak, and what looks to be a young #1 WR with decent depth there and a young #1 RB, and I don't really blame them. There's worse ways to spend money and to save premium picks for defense. Otherwise, what were we going to do at RT? Keep Fleming at $5m cap hit, see if CWill can play it, otherwise spend a 2-3 round pick on a RT and hope for the best? Tackle is now a premium position. Saints and Eagles both have 1st round picks at RT, yeah Lane Johnson will move to LT but he's also going to get $20million+ a year.

If you can get a good deal in the trenches, especially for a 26 year old lineman, you'd be pretty stupid not to take it. Especially if it saves you picks.

What it says about Dallas is, we want to put the best OL we can on the field in the trenches, with young talent at QB, RB, and WR. And we'll be using our premium picks on defense, locking up guys we think are cornerstones on defense instead of signing everyone. But, using premium picks to replenish instead. There's always give and take, but it's not a bad strategy.

I'd also put $$ on the cap going up pretty significantly every year from 2021 forward. It'll at least be an improvement on the $8-10million now. I'd say it's more likely to go up about $40million by the 2022 offseason.
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,571
Reaction score
3,440
Fleming is a $4.5m savings next year if released.

Wouldn't be surprised to see CWill taking snaps at RT next camp to see if he's competent, while competing at LG. If he wins LG and can play RT well enough, he'll slide out if Collins misses time. McGovern would be LG, C, RG depth with possibly Looney and whoever else in that case.

Cap isn't going to be that big a problem. Dallas wants to secure the OL with talent, with a young Dak, and what looks to be a young #1 WR with decent depth there and a young #1 RB, and I don't really blame them. There's worse ways to spend money and to save premium picks for defense. Otherwise, what were we going to do at RT? Keep Fleming at $5m cap hit, see if CWill can play it, otherwise spend a 2-3 round pick on a RT and hope for the best? Tackle is now a premium position. Saints and Eagles both have 1st round picks at RT, yeah Lane Johnson will move to LT but he's also going to get $20million+ a year.

If you can get a good deal in the trenches, especially for a 26 year old lineman, you'd be pretty stupid not to take it. Especially if it saves you picks.

What it says about Dallas is, we want to put the best OL we can on the field in the trenches, with young talent at QB, RB, and WR. And we'll be using our premium picks on defense, locking up guys we think are cornerstones on defense instead of signing everyone. But, using premium picks to replenish instead. There's always give and take, but it's not a bad strategy.

I'd also put $$ on the cap going up pretty significantly every year from 2021 forward. It'll at least be an improvement on the $8-10million now. I'd say it's more likely to go up about $40million by the 2022 offseason.
Eagles draft they're future LT in Dillard this year!
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
that we do the same thing as other teams? sign players? do other teams not do that? im confused here, whats the question? we are doing the same as other teams here. it says nothing. you have to sign players, someone has to play on your roster.
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
It tells us this franchise finally realize what it takes to win this league. You're winning the pits
 

Number1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
1,326
"What does the La’el Collins contract extension tell us about the future of the Dallas Cowboys?"

I hope it means Colombo has him on a good path the Boys have confidence in
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,746
Reaction score
20,826
Maybe the health of the offensive line is a little more concerning that we realize

If the team has concerns about Smith’s health, they could be leaving the door open for a possible exit strategy. Even though Smith does have five years left on his contract, his dead money hit drops to $5.2 M after this season and just $1.7 M the year after that.

Nobody wants to think about life without Smith, but if you look at all the recent decisions the team has made regarding the offensive line, something’s a bit askew. The team went super heavy at offensive line for their final roster, including hanging on to undrafted free agent Brandon Knight, who just so happens to be able to play tackle. And one of their practice squad players is UDFA Mitch Hyatt. The team is making sure they have tackle depth.

Maybe the decision to keep Collins has nothing to do with Smith specifically, but just the collective concern of their star linemen in general. Zack Martin is also dealing with a back issue. His was bad enough that he was shelved for training camp to allow him more time to heal. Should Martin become unavailable, that means they would need to call on that interior line depth to help out.

But for worries about Tyron, I don't see how this makes sense. Seems like some pricey insurance.
 

75boyz

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,009
Reaction score
9,667
Maybe the health of the offensive line is a little more concerning that we realize
Tyron Smith is dealing with a bad back. Sure, he’s only 28-years-old, but let’s not forget that he’s been in the league since he was 20, so he’s put a lot of mileage on that body. Eight years spent with the league’s most powerful edge rushers pound on you can be very jarring on that back. He has missed three games in each of the last three seasons, and it wouldn’t shock anyone if he misses time again this season. The Cowboys are already mindful of that, which is why swing tackle Cameron Fleming received the second-biggest contract of any of their free agent signings this offseason.

If the team has concerns about Smith’s health, they could be leaving the door open for a possible exit strategy. Even though Smith does have five years left on his contract, his dead money hit drops to $5.2 M after this season and just $1.7 M the year after that.

Nobody wants to think about life without Smith, but if you look at all the recent decisions the team has made regarding the offensive line, something’s a bit askew. The team went super heavy at offensive line for their final roster, including hanging on to undrafted free agent Brandon Knight, who just so happens to be able to play tackle. And one of their practice squad players is UDFA Mitch Hyatt. The team is making sure they have tackle depth.

Maybe the decision to keep Collins has nothing to do with Smith specifically, but just the collective concern of their star linemen in general. Zack Martin is also dealing with a back issue. His was bad enough that he was shelved for training camp to allow him more time to heal. Should Martin become unavailable, that means they would need to call on that interior line depth to help out. That could foil their chance to move Connor Williams outside to cover for La’el if Williams is needed inside. Keeping Collins on the roster means they’d no longer have to worry about moving Williams, who will hopefully show great improvement at the left guard position this year. Securing their talent along the offensive line is great, but doesn’t it comes with a cost?


https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ell-us-about-the-future-of-the-dallas-cowboys

Really nice post. Very logical assumptions plus the historical facts you provided concerning ongoing injury issues make offensive line stability their most important goal to sustaining any long-term success.

They began with Smith as the cornerstone of their identity and followed his drafting with additional highly pedigreed oline draft capital as well. It's their foundation. If they plan on keeping it intact with both starters and above average depth in the batters box, it’s as good a recipe as there is to establishing and maintaining success at the NFL level. It’s the one area of team building by this Front Office that I can strongly support.
 
Last edited:

unionjack8

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,854
Reaction score
26,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Tells me that Jerry and co expect the next CBA to be a huge win for the players in terms of % revenue they receive for the cap.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,113
Reaction score
14,022
Initially I would have to wonder about concerns regarding Tyron's back, and is there now a change in plans for the future RT spot, but that still doesn't explain re-signing what
has been an average player playing out an average career thus far.
Otherwise we are either going to have one of our high rounder OG guys sit the bench as a backup and either play out his current rookie contract en route to free agency .. or an eventual trade.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
17,212
It says Connor Williams is moving into Tyron's spot if he can't play and McGovern into left guard.
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,920
Reaction score
17,681
I hope it says the Cowboys front office finally has a plan to succeed. Signing all the offensive linemen to long term deals is smart. Continuity is important up front and they have a group of talented guys. Maybe Smith is banged up, but I don;t think Collns; deal has much to do with that. At least I hope not.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,326
Reaction score
43,954
that we do the same thing as other teams? sign players? do other teams not do that? im confused here, whats the question? we are doing the same as other teams here. it says nothing. you have to sign players, someone has to play on your roster.
Yeah it’s just that most teams don’t draft well enough and so have to sign their guys in free agency.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
Yeah it’s just that most teams don’t draft well enough and so have to sign their guys in free agency.


for some teams it works. we ve been drafting our butts off with nothing to show for it.

all last year "dallas has one of the youngest rosters, Dalass has one of the youngest rosters"

me: doesnt win you the SB.

DC FO: Shut up.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,326
Reaction score
43,954
for some teams it works. we ve been drafting our butts off with nothing to show for it.

all last year "dallas has one of the youngest rosters, Dalass has one of the youngest rosters"

me: doesnt win you the SB.

DC FO: Shut up.
Well if you’re going to lose in the divisional round... I’d rather have a young, up-and-coming team that drafts well, than an old, over-the-hill roster that has to get most of its talent through free agency.

They’re young and still growing. You got to start somewhere.
 
Top