Has NFL Explained Why Clock Never Started Until Teddy Passed The Ball At End Of Half?

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,869
Reaction score
16,131
It has to be slipping in his hands, which it certainly didn't appear to be. They were pulling on it and his hands were moving with it, but it wasn't slipping in his hands until after his elbow hit the ground, which may be why he lost his grip in the first place.

I'll post this in the proper thread but not so sure about your statement. That's why I asked what the rule was. True he didn't lose grip until the ground, but he was certainly losing grip before the ground because the ball did turn.

Elliott-Fumble1-1.gif
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,386
Reaction score
94,357
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I'll post this in the proper thread but not so sure about your statement. That's why I asked what the rule was. True he didn't lose grip until the ground, but he was certainly losing grip before the ground because the ball did turn.

Elliott-Fumble1-1.gif
It looks very clear to me that the ball doesn't slip until after his elbow hits. His hands are moving with the ball until that point, which means he still had control of it. You can see the nose of the ball doesn't move in his hand.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
It looks very clear to me that the ball doesn't slip until after his elbow hits. His hands are moving with the ball until that point, which means he still had control of it. You can see the nose of the ball doesn't move in his hand.
It's not a matter of catching the ball, but not losing it before making ground contact. So to me it looks as if he had the ball in his hands until then. Even though his hands are moving.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,869
Reaction score
16,131
It looks very clear to me that the ball doesn't slip until after his elbow hits. His hands are moving with the ball until that point, which means he still had control of it. You can see the nose of the ball doesn't move in his hand.

You don't think the ball was turning as his elbow hit? It certainly was. Does the league consider the continuation of action when it starts to turn is the question. But if you're trying to pin a ball to your chest and it gets pried away from your chest, it moves and is a less secure possession.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,386
Reaction score
94,357
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
You don't think the ball was turning as his elbow hit? It certainly was. Does the league consider the continuation of action when it starts to turn is the question. But if you're trying to pin a ball to your chest and it gets pried away from your chest, it moves and is a less secure possession.
By "turning", do you mean they were pulling it and his hands away from his body on the lengthwise axis of the ball? If that's what you mean, yes, they were. But the ball wasn't coming loose from his hands at that point.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,386
Reaction score
94,357
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
You don't think the ball was turning as his elbow hit? It certainly was. Does the league consider the continuation of action when it starts to turn is the question. But if you're trying to pin a ball to your chest and it gets pried away from your chest, it moves and is a less secure possession.
It's my understanding that they consider loss of control when the ball is slipping in the players hands. The sudden release and collapse of Zeke's hands tells me that wasn't the case until after hitting the ground.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,869
Reaction score
16,131
It's my understanding that they consider loss of control when the ball is slipping in the players hands. The sudden release and collapse of Zeke's hands tells me that wasn't the case until after hitting the ground.

Then I guess the question is does the league consider the movement of the ball as "slipping" along with the fact that the ball did completely leave his possession later.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,386
Reaction score
94,357
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Then I guess the question is does the league consider the movement of the ball as "slipping" along with the fact that the ball did completely leave his possession later.
The best way I can explain my personal understanding is to imagine the ball is glued into his hands. When the glue breaks its hold on the ball to both hands, (when being held with 2 hands, of course) it's "slipping". If even one hand is still glued, it's under control.
 

9of11

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,954
Reaction score
2,069
That was a bad call...but it all comes down in this game to who made the fewest turnovers....even though we got screwed on one of them but we shouldn't have put ourselves in that position....the offense seemed like they were slow walking the entire game...when they got pace and sped everything up on offense...we couldn't be stopped....then we stopped...I dont know why...
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,009
Reaction score
17,897
The officiating didn't have an impact on the Cowboys losing last night. Elliott's fumble was very close, and it was going to go in whichever direction it was ruled on the field. Since it was ruled a fumble when the play took place, it wasn't going to get overturned. The Cowboys have no one to blame but themselves for their overly conservative game plan, and their best players being manhandled by their Saint counterparts.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
The whole game the Saints got zebra help and I kept thinking that's ok we're going to start scoring sooner or later...:mad:
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,763
Reaction score
20,837
Any of you's want to comment on this (especially the guy who ran his own stopwatch, lol)? I ran the video AND did a seconds count down to the tenth. Not sure if the NFL uses tenths of a second in counting down but this is what it'd look like if they did. As some alertly pointed out, we don't know if the actual seconds count on the clock was greater than 4.0 seconds. But for my video, let's assume it was 4.0 exactly. Keep in mind I started the clock on first movement of the ball, not as someone attempting to react in real time not knowing when the ball will be snapped exactly. People were right that it didn't take 2 seconds. It took like 2.9 seconds which would leave 1 second on the clock if timed like this and starting from exactly 4.0 seconds. If you want another reference, look at the Saints play clock to the right of the game clock on the graphic. It was running the entire time. The ball gets snapped at around 14 seconds and lands at around 11 seconds. Another 3 second timer. What of the CONSPIRACY! then?

First-Half-Clock.gif

Two seconds was not credible. Three seconds is.

The right way to do this is to get a 30p or 60p video and count the frames.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,999
Reaction score
29,875
I'll post this in the proper thread but not so sure about your statement. That's why I asked what the rule was. True he didn't lose grip until the ground, but he was certainly losing grip before the ground because the ball did turn.

Elliott-Fumble1-1.gif
What you can’t see is if his knee or hip was already down..
 

camelboy

mgcowboy
Messages
4,607
Reaction score
2,768
People saying:
We had enough time to overcome that
We shouldn't have been in that situation
We go the lead back and surrendered it
blah blah blah

How about we enter the game with GB next week with them 7-0? We have a whole full game to make it up???

Fact is, it should not count. It is exactly as if both team are in the locker rooms at HT and the ref knock on our door and say
"Hey Boys, You are down by 3"

This game (counting game time) is 10-9 Cowboys

:cool:
 

CT Dal Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,531
Reaction score
20,404
The whole game the Saints got zebra help and I kept thinking that's ok we're going to start scoring sooner or later...:mad:

The Saints are going to get a lot of help from the men in stripes this year after they got screwed out of the Super Bowl last January.

Amari Cooper was interfered with all night and he's the one that got penalized, for example.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,999
Reaction score
29,875
People saying:
We had enough time to overcome that
We shouldn't have been in that situation
We go the lead back and surrendered it
blah blah blah

How about we enter the game with GB next week with them 7-0? We have a whole full game to make it up???

Fact is, it should not count. It is exactly as if both team are in the locker rooms at HT and the ref knock on our door and say
"Hey Boys, You are down by 3"

This game (counting game time) is 10-9 Cowboys

:cool:
Rooked before halftime...
 

cowboyec

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,579
Reaction score
40,418
because america's top cop goodell is a spinless,empty-suited,untalented gutless swamp-hagg.
ipso-fatso......solved.
 
Top