Twitter: Two Jets players fined for illegal hits to Dak, neither was flagged

Runwildboys said:

Are you kidding me? If Brady was getting hit like that, the officials would've started hitting the defensive players with baseball bats!

Click to expand...

If it was brady the refs would have ejected a player if they hit him more than once...

Maybe Dak should just start holding his arms out after every play like Rodgers, making it rain yellow.

khiladi said:

It wasn’t a slap from what I recall. The DL guy was basically engaged and his hand touched somewhere in the neck area of Dak as he ran by him and they threw a bogus flag.

Click to expand...

Maybe we're thinking of different incidents, because what I saw was a grazing, incidental slap to the side of the helmet, behind the ear hole, IIRC. Actually, the word "slap" might even be too harsh, but it's something officials tend to call, just because it was a hand to the QB's head.

Romo_To_Dez said:

Yet Refs have called personal fouls against defenders and their hits on Rodgers and Brady that weren't nearly as bad as the illegal hits that Dak took against the Jets.

Click to expand...

Dont forget Russel Wilson...

khiladi said:

1. No, I’m not wrong. He wasn’t. And it was a cheese call. You just tried to get around it by saying, “Well, Rodgers would have gotten it.” “Well, it was meaningless in this context, because the game was out of hand.” You see, I can play that game too.

2. Your claim is that Dak is getting massacred beyond what other QBs faced, especially Romo. Provide the stats that he does, when he’s basically had a clean pocket the whole season.

Click to expand...

Show me where I said anything about Dak getting “massacred”
Literally, my first response to you was “no argument on Romo’s punishment”. How is that confusing to you? Please explain.

Dak was clearly hit in the head. This guy says it was weak. Which(calm down and read back) I said as well. He also said his hand did “brush” his head. That’s a synonym of hit in this case. He was clearly hit in the head. That’s simply a fact. https://sports.yahoo.com/packers-fl...l-on-dak-prescott-running-play-005105415.html


Your tone makes it seem that you’re upset. I’m sorry you feel that way.

Bueller, Bueller, Bueller...

khiladi said:

1. No, I’m not wrong. He wasn’t. And it was a cheese call. You just tried to get around it by saying, “Well, Rodgers would have gotten it.” “Well, it was meaningless in this context, because the game was out of hand.” You see, I can play that game too.

2. Your claim is that Dak is getting massacred beyond what other QBs faced, especially Romo. Provide the stats that he does, when he’s basically had a clean pocket the whole season. Further one of those hits, the quad hit Dak when the OL pushed him into Dak. Totally questionable anyway..

Click to expand...

It’s game time.
I accept your apology. I guess you had me mixed up.
No problem.

Mr_C said:

Show me where I said anything about Dak getting “massacred”
Literally, my first response to you was “no argument on Romo’s punishment”. How is that confusing to you? Please explain.

Dak was clearly hit in the head. This guy says it was weak. Which(calm down and read back) I said as well. He also said his hand did “brush” his head. That’s a synonym of hit in this case. He was clearly hit in the head. That’s simply a fact. https://sports.yahoo.com/packers-fl...l-on-dak-prescott-running-play-005105415.html


Your tone makes it seem that you’re upset. I’m sorry you feel that way.

Click to expand...

No, your first response was asking if I said he git hit in the head, and I said no. No, brushing is not hitting in the head. That’s called contact. Contact isn’t hitting.

Figures!

damn quinn!

But it's all fair, there no anti Dallas bias

Romo had like 3 late hit calls despite constant late hits.

THere were those two and several more. Dak got lifted off his feet and planted in the turf several times which is supposed to be a penalty.

AmariChill said:

He may need to start crying like Brady and Rodgers. I’m being serious. I’m getting tired of Dak being thrown around like a damn ragdoll and not getting any calls made his way. I know he’s tough but dang dude.

Click to expand...

I’m all for it! Cry, get the call , Win the Game..

khiladi said:

No, your first response was asking if I said he git hit in the head, and I said no. No, brushing is not hitting in the head. That’s called contact. Contact isn’t hitting.

Click to expand...

Wrong. https://www.google.com/search?q=contact+definition&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari


You accused me of something. You were wrong.

You’re sorry and I’m good with it. Don’t worry about it lil dude.

ShortRound131 said:

Click to expand...

Seriously! Rodgers and Brady are just constantly complaining to the refs and the refs kiss their ***. It’s sickening! Watching packers game these last weeks Rodgers constantly yelling at the refs and then chumming it up with them when he gets the calls.

Mr_C said:

Wrong. https://www.google.com/search?q=contact+definition&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari


You accused me of something. You were wrong.

You’re sorry and I’m good with it. Don’t worry about it lil dude.

Click to expand...

1. Contact is not hitting. Kissing is contact, sexual intercourse is contact and the DL did neither of those. Your clearly not ‘good with it’, which is why you are now referencing online dictionaries and that too incorrectly. But keep pretending with your routine.

2. Nope, I said from the very beginning he wasn’t hit. I didn’t accuse you of anything. I answered your question in my first sentence that Dak wasn’t hit and the announcers said he wasn’t hit.

I didn’t just say it, the announcers also said it. Romo’s situation and Dak’s are nothing alike period. Romo used to get battered on a weekly. Dak’s been dredging behind a clean pocket his whole career, while he moves himself into pressure the majority of time.

Click to expand...

but carry on..

khiladi said:

1. Contact is not hitting. Kissing is contact, sexual intercourse is contact and the DL did neither of those. Your clearly not ‘good with it’, which is why you are now referencing online dictionaries and that too incorrectly. But keep pretending with your routine.

2. Nope, I said from the very beginning he wasn’t hit. I didn’t accuse you of anything. I answered your question in my first sentence that Dak wasn’t hit and the announcers said he wasn’t hit.



but carry on..

Click to expand...

We’ll try it again:
Show me where I said anything about Dak getting “massacred”
Literally, my first response to you was “no argument on Romo’s punishment”. How is that confusing to you? Please explain.

Or admit you were wrong. Again. Somehow I think you’re the type of person that has a problem with this. Even on the internet


Your quote;

“2. Your claim is that Dak is getting massacred beyond what other QBs faced, especially Romo. Provide the stats that he does, when he’s basically had a clean pocket the whole season.”

Your other quote “I didn’t accuse you of anything”

Do you see how you don’t make sense?

boxer-rumble said:

That’s unacceptable.

Click to expand...

And WILL end up driving fans away from the game.

Mr_C said:

We’ll try it again:
Show me where I said anything about Dak getting “massacred”
Literally, my first response to you was “no argument on Romo’s punishment”. How is that confusing to you? Please explain.

Or admit you were wrong. Again. Somehow I think you’re the type of person that has a problem with this. Even on the internet


Your quote;

“2. Your claim is that Dak is getting massacred beyond what other QBs faced, especially Romo. Provide the stats that he does, when he’s basically had a clean pocket the whole season.”

Your other quote “I didn’t accuse you of anything”

Do you see how you don’t make sense?

Click to expand...

1. No, that wasn’t your ‘first response’. Your first response was a question where my post was addressing this claim that Dak was getting massacred unfairly, which included an example where Dak got a BOGUS call of favoritism, and people were trying to leverage it like Romo. I was saying it’s also a CROCK, BEFORE YOU EVEN ASKED THE QUESTION, because Dak hardly gets togched by defenders. So people have nothing to compare it to and are just trying to ‘pump the legend of Dak’.

2. You then address me directly homie directly with this question and I said NO he didn’t get hit and the announcers said the same thing, while STICKING TO MY POST.

3. Your response, without any proof, was that he did get hit as if I’m just going to believe your word. You then you went on this speech about how you loved Romo. Then you asked for STATS that prove Dak hasn’t been getting pressure and I have them, but yet, you are sitting here acting like you only kept to one subject. You also tried to argue that call Dak got was meaningless, because the game was supposedly out of hand among other nonsensical reasons, which basically affirms your argued that Dak did get a call he shouldn’t have. You further tried to justify it by saying Rodgers would have gotten the same call, which doesn’t prove favoritism for Rodgers as opposed to Dak, but the exact opposite.

4. I then provided you the stats about Dak not getting pressured and then asked you got stats to provide the claim Dak is getting hit unfairly as opposed to the rest of the league, for you to establish some sort of claim he’s being ‘targeted’ especially In light of how little he actually gets pressured to the rest of the league so you could make some judgmeny.

5. Now you look even more like you don’t know what you are talking, because you don’t even know the difference between ‘contact’ and ‘hit’, while pretending you never asked me questions like “where are the stats”.

and here we are, you patting yourself in the back thinking you won this debate.