Romo vs Dak

RD21

Well-Known Member
Messages
383
Reaction score
814
Romo didn’t make those players. Key starters like TO, Witten, Dez, Murray and others had more of an influence on those guys’ stats while in Dallas because they drew the attention away from the second tier guys by commanding extra coverage rolled over the top and in Murray’s case, an extra man in the box. All Romo did is what any seasoned quarterback should do. THROW TO THE OPEN RECEIVERS. You guys kill me with that “Romo made them” BS... None of those guys remained effective as a main WR in Dallas with Romo or anywhere else for that matter. Once the previous number ones left those guys production fell off. Austin may have faired best. But much of his yardage was after the catch because he ran strong and broke a lot of tackles. Not because of some Romo Mojo. LMAO. They were all really good number twos who benefitted from single coverage vs. second and third best cornerbacks. With the exception of Dez. Who would’ve been Dez with or without Romo. You dudes with this Romo fanaticism are really delusional.

I agree.

I think a case can be made that T.O. made Romo. I believe without T.O., Romo wouldn't have had the career he did. Having T.O. for his first 3 years as a starter. really helped #9. A WR that can haul in 38 TD's, & 3600 yds in 3 seasons is top of the charts, & forces defenses to adjust. Same could be said for a similar 3yr span with Dez.

I'm of the opinion, without T.O., Romo wouldn't have been our starter for as long as he was.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,727
Reaction score
69,369
With the exception of Zeke, name one other position Dak has at his disposal that’s better.... :facepalm:
Even then Murray’s 2014 season was no small feat. Marion Barber was pretty good for a few seasons also. If y’all gonna make these comparisons be equal and honest about it.
These people have revisionist history. Now Romo teams suck but he played with 12 other Pro Bowlers and hall of famers.....it’s the same thing guys do with Wentz....all year the Eagles had the best talent.....now they suck according to those same morons.
 

sjmike

Well-Known Member
Messages
650
Reaction score
1,226
Woke up this morning in a funk and thought to myself, “Darn, but I’d sure like to see an old-fashioned, thoroughly redundant and absolutely meaningless Romo vs Dak thread.”

Thanks, OP! :);):rolleyes:
I am big fan of both quarterbacks. The whole point of the thread was to show that maybe we should be happy for what we have in Dak. He is going stride for stride with Romo and I loved Romo's game.
 

GenoT

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,985
Reaction score
8,739
Romo played with scrubs while Dak plays with HOFers. Romo is better than Aikman while Dak is a bum. The reason Romo didn't win more is because of other players and bad coaching. Dak's responsible for all the losses. Heard it here.
For Tony’s entire career, and to this day, the Romoholic Mantra is:

Cowboys win: “Tony carried the whole team.”
Cowboys loss: “Tony couldn’t carry the whole team.”

Con Safos del Mundo
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,442
Reaction score
26,292
Romo didn’t make those players. Key starters like TO, Witten, Dez, Murray and others had more of an influence on those guys’ stats while in Dallas because they drew the attention away from the second tier guys by commanding extra coverage rolled over the top and in Murray’s case, an extra man in the box. All Romo did is what any seasoned quarterback should do. THROW TO THE OPEN RECEIVERS. You guys kill me with that “Romo made them” BS... None of those guys remained effective as a main WR in Dallas with Romo or anywhere else for that matter. Once the previous number ones left those guys production fell off. Austin may have faired best. But much of his yardage was after the catch because he ran strong and broke a lot of tackles. Not because of some Romo Mojo. LMAO. They were all really good number twos who benefitted from single coverage vs. second and third best cornerbacks. With the exception of Dez. Who would’ve been Dez with or without Romo. You dudes with this Romo fanaticism are really delusional.
Not only that but this crap that Dak doesn't make players better is silly. Cooper has had a remake since getting with Dak. In fact many on here claimed cooper was trash the day they found out he was traded to Dallas. Also Beasley had his best season with Dak. Witten this season was scoring TDs almost every game to start out and had one taken away last week. Tavon Austin is scoring TDs again, Devin Smith was breaking his bust label.
 

cowboy_ron

You Can't Fix Stupid
Messages
15,357
Reaction score
24,300
Let me preface by saying that I was a huge Tony Romo fan. Living in Iggle country, I would defend him all day against the likes of McNabb, etc. I thought he was hugely underrated and not given much to work with as compared to the other greats of the day. Then Dak had to start his rookie year because Romo got hurt in preseason. Was basically thrust in because he was all we had. Played his *** off. Was Offensive Rookie of the Year. Romo was healthy again towards the end of the year but I wanted to ride the hot hand and stay with Dak. And that's what they did. Romo came in on the last drive against the Iggles in the last game and drove the team to a TD. Storybook ending to a great career. Well deserved. Well earned.
Anyway, here we are into Dak's fourth year and I am wondering how he measures up to the stud that I thought Tony Romo was. I don't have all the comeback stats, I hope someone can chime in with that but I know they both have alot of them. But I have other key QB stats. These are career stats
Romo Dak
Yds/gm 219.1 236.3
Comp pct 65.3 66.7
TD % 5.7 4.6
Int % 2.7 1.9
Pass Rating 97.1 96.9
Total Pass TDs 248 79
Rush Yds 620 1107
Rush TDs 5 21
Years Played 10 3.5
I know alot of you are Romo fans. Does everyone realize how favorably Dak compares to Romo? They are very similar in many stats but Dak has the added advantage of 21 rushing TDs and over 1100 rushing yards.
That's 4 times as many rushing TDs and almost twice as many rushing yards in about a third of a career. I know that Romo was a better pure passer and Dak is a better mobile QB but can we please realize how good we have it to have Dak as our QB for now and the year's to come? And I believe Dak is only gonna get better. What say you?
I'm a huge fan of both of them.
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,273
Reaction score
11,832
With the exception of Zeke, name one other position Dak has at his disposal that’s better.... :facepalm:
Even then Murray’s 2014 season was no small feat. Marion Barber was pretty good for a few seasons also. If y’all gonna make these comparisons be equal and honest about it.

Oline and defense
 

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
3,603
The problem that many Dak and Romo haters/homers have is they always think that anyone who disagrees about the one they prefer is basing their opinions on stats or other quarterback attributes.

That's just not the case for most people and many of them do not even realize it themselves.

Romo was a great quarterback. He got better as he got older until his health became an issue.

Dak started out great, then declined a little and has been playing much better this year.

The bottom line though? None of that matters. It does not matter who was/is better. It does not matter whose stats were better.

What matters is winning playoff games and Super Bowls. As great as Romo was, we all know that his teams did not make it to the NFC championship much less the Super Bowl.

It doesn't matter if it was his fault or the defense's fault. It does not matter if the other team the Cowboys lost to in the playoffs was peaking at the right time.

The only thing that matters is winning. Winning in the regular season to get to the playoffs, winning playoff games to get the Super Bowl, and then winning a Super Bowl.

There are a lot of great quarterbacks who never won a Super Bowl and there are several average or worse quarterbacks who have.

Cowboys fans will always judge the Cowboys quarterbacks on post-season success.

In the end, Romo had very little post-season success and his career is over. Meaning, that book is closed and what he won is all he will ever win.

Dak may never be Romo or may be way better than Romo. None of that matters.

The only thing that matters is if Dak helps the Cowboys win Super Bowls. Otherwise, we'll be comparing Romo and Dak to the next franchise quarterback in a few years while hoping that one leads the Cowboys to a Super Bowl win.

Dak is gonna lead this team to a SB W.
 

romothesavior

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,512
Reaction score
4,366
Let me preface by saying that I was a huge Tony Romo fan. Living in Iggle country, I would defend him all day against the likes of McNabb, etc. I thought he was hugely underrated and not given much to work with as compared to the other greats of the day. Then Dak had to start his rookie year because Romo got hurt in preseason. Was basically thrust in because he was all we had. Played his *** off. Was Offensive Rookie of the Year. Romo was healthy again towards the end of the year but I wanted to ride the hot hand and stay with Dak. And that's what they did. Romo came in on the last drive against the Iggles in the last game and drove the team to a TD. Storybook ending to a great career. Well deserved. Well earned.
Anyway, here we are into Dak's fourth year and I am wondering how he measures up to the stud that I thought Tony Romo was. I don't have all the comeback stats, I hope someone can chime in with that but I know they both have alot of them. But I have other key QB stats. These are career stats
Romo Dak
Yds/gm 219.1 236.3
Comp pct 65.3 66.7
TD % 5.7 4.6
Int % 2.7 1.9
Pass Rating 97.1 96.9
Total Pass TDs 248 79
Rush Yds 620 1107
Rush TDs 5 21
Years Played 10 3.5
I know alot of you are Romo fans. Does everyone realize how favorably Dak compares to Romo? They are very similar in many stats but Dak has the added advantage of 21 rushing TDs and over 1100 rushing yards.
That's 4 times as many rushing TDs and almost twice as many rushing yards in about a third of a career. I know that Romo was a better pure passer and Dak is a better mobile QB but can we please realize how good we have it to have Dak as our QB for now and the year's to come? And I believe Dak is only gonna get better. What say you?
Biggest Romo fan around and I agree. Dak has been impressive.

I was skeptical for a while but he's turned me into a believer.

Too bad he'll never win a ring with Garrett at the helm.
 

jaybird

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,465
Reaction score
801
Let me preface by saying that I was a huge Tony Romo fan. Living in Iggle country, I would defend him all day against the likes of McNabb, etc. I thought he was hugely underrated and not given much to work with as compared to the other greats of the day. Then Dak had to start his rookie year because Romo got hurt in preseason. Was basically thrust in because he was all we had. Played his *** off. Was Offensive Rookie of the Year. Romo was healthy again towards the end of the year but I wanted to ride the hot hand and stay with Dak. And that's what they did. Romo came in on the last drive against the Iggles in the last game and drove the team to a TD. Storybook ending to a great career. Well deserved. Well earned.
Anyway, here we are into Dak's fourth year and I am wondering how he measures up to the stud that I thought Tony Romo was. I don't have all the comeback stats, I hope someone can chime in with that but I know they both have alot of them. But I have other key QB stats. These are career stats
Romo Dak
Yds/gm 219.1 236.3
Comp pct 65.3 66.7
TD % 5.7 4.6
Int % 2.7 1.9
Pass Rating 97.1 96.9
Total Pass TDs 248 79
Rush Yds 620 1107
Rush TDs 5 21
Years Played 10 3.5
I know alot of you are Romo fans. Does everyone realize how favorably Dak compares to Romo? They are very similar in many stats but Dak has the added advantage of 21 rushing TDs and over 1100 rushing yards.
That's 4 times as many rushing TDs and almost twice as many rushing yards in about a third of a career. I know that Romo was a better pure passer and Dak is a better mobile QB but can we please realize how good we have it to have Dak as our QB for now and the year's to come? And I believe Dak is only gonna get better. What say you?
Good post and agree
That said: I’m not sure either has/had the right stuff to carry us to a championship. Maybe if the team as a whole is great.
 

Redline360

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
4,655
While Dak is good he is nowhere near Romo good. It's crazy to even think so. Let's have this talk when Dak gets more years under his belt

Romo spent the majority of his career running for his life while Dak has had a top or above average line. Plus now factor in Zeke. Romo also played the majority of his career with horrendous defenses bar 2 or 3 years.

It's just a shame that romo couldn't stay healthy before dallas got their priorites straight. Cowboys front office wasted a top 5 quarterback when in his prime.

Romo is far superior talent wise however it took him a while to get going. Like I said let's see how Dak is in another couple seasons
 

StuckMojo

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,991
Reaction score
3,419
I am/was a fan of both because i am a Dallas fan. I want the Dallas QB to be very good and have the best possible team around them.
 
Top