shabazz
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,671
- Reaction score
- 30,794
yeah i have to admit you always stay.
And if he light up the Patriots, our whole posse will be celebrating like hell!
yeah i have to admit you always stay.
When you're down, 31-3, it doesn't matter how you play thereafter.Beating teams is not an individual stat. Dakota also played well after the slow starts with Minny and GB... There are reasons (some that Dak is responsible for and many others that he is not e.g. drops, penalties, etc) regardless, his worst games were not dogs, but considered average to slightly below avg..
When you're down, 31-3, it doesn't matter how you play thereafter.
I for one, dont believe in moving goal post in any way shape or form. If he feasts on the bottom 10 or worse defenses that has to be factored in. But facing the Patriots and Bills good defenses the next couple weeks has to be factored in as well. I hope he shreds them and will extremely happy to acknowledge it
The fair minded posters here will tell you I dont go away. Always here on Monday to share my views like the rest of us.
You're right. I remember when Atlanta destroyed Rodgers in 2014 what was that score again?When you're down, 31-3, it doesn't matter how you play thereafter.
When you're down, 31-3, it doesn't matter how you play thereafter.
He's the best quarterback I've ever seen.
He's had pedestrian rosters with lousy defenses and so-so receivers most of his career. And awful coaches.
If he had a roster like this in Dallas.....oh my word.
I appreciate his effort, but I don't credit the garbage time stats.Weren't you the one talking about the 70s and the 90s? If so, then maybe you should tell Frank Reich "When you're down 31-3, it doesn't matter how you play thereafter". I say this because in a playoff game, Frank Reich brought the Bills back from a 35-3 deficit and won the game. But hey, if you are the type to lay down and die when things get tough, that's on you. I'm glad Dak kept fighting and trying to win that game for us.
I appreciate his effort, but I don't credit the garbage time stats.
The game you referenced ended the run and shoot offense. Houston couldn't run clock.
I fully acknowledge that Dak has played well.Fine, let's compare the two to common opponents (Det, Minn, Philly)
Rodgers W/L=2-1
80/126, 914yds, 63.5%, 7.3 avg/att, 6TD (0 rushing TD), 2Int, 94.5 rating, 42.7avg QBR
Dak W/L=2-1
78/119, 1080yds, 65.5%, 9.1 avg/att, 7 TD (1 Rushing TD), 2Int, 107.3 rating, 73.1 avg QBR
At some point people need to acknowledge that Dak is playing at an elite level regardless of the opponent (anybody see Brady's stats against the eagles or Clev, or NYJ pt2).
No, garbage time stats come when the other team is basically letting you march down the field as long as you burn clock in the process. Give up all the underneath stuff and protect deep.Hmmm, I wasn't aware there was any "Garbage Time" while you were still trailing. I thought "Garbage Time" was when you put in second stringers to protect your starters.
Not having to compete against Brady, Peyton, Big Ben, and Rivers during their prime means he’s had it easier path to the SB each year. Dude just chokes.Uh, the NFC has been vastly superior to the AFC most every year for a long time.
The Patriots and Steelers only. Perhaps the Ravens. Others here and there.
Bills, Browns, Jets, Dolphins, Bengals, Raiders, Chiefs, Titans, Chargers, Texans, Jaguars.....
Bad teams most of the time.
didn't he have a 15-1 team after the superbowl year and got smoked in the playoffs by the Giants.LOL yes JG would help him win more than one ring. He’s had some of the best WRs in the league at the time Driver, Jennings, Jordy, Cobb, Adams, and Graham. Had some decent defenses and the NFC north wasn’t very good when he took over. Should have done more especially playing in the weaker NFC.
I know you are. I've had discussion with you before. That's why I said "they" instead of "you".
I fully acknowledge that Dak has played well.
Speaking to the choir, just not the over the top choir
He’s underachieved but people give him a pass cause he has that one ring. If he didn’t have that ring he’d be called an all time choker.didn't he have a 15-1 team after the superbowl year and got smoked in the playoffs by the Giants.
Fine, let's compare the two to common opponents (Det, Minn, Philly)
Rodgers W/L=2-1
80/126, 914yds, 63.5%, 7.3 avg/att, 6TD (0 rushing TD), 2Int, 94.5 rating, 42.7avg QBR
Dak W/L=2-1
78/119, 1080yds, 65.5%, 9.1 avg/att, 7 TD (1 Rushing TD), 2Int, 107.3 rating, 73.1 avg QBR
At some point people need to acknowledge that Dak is playing at an elite level regardless of the opponent (anybody see Brady's stats against the eagles or Clev, or NYJ pt2).