CWR
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,560
- Reaction score
- 34,295
Had Zeke not fumbled against New Orleans (or Witt but Zeke’s was more critical) we would have beat NO, possibly NE if it weren’t for the phantom tripping calls but I don’t like using that as an excuse, today if Dak didn’t fumble or our defense could recover a fumble and not let the opposing QB run for a first down or Maher could hit a FG, GB was more about our porous over rated defense than it was coaching, Jets we were missing several key players, MN we for beat by a little.
To answer your question, based on our current talent level I would say we’re almost right we’re we should be because the players lost a lot of those games. I could concede a win or two based on coaching but we could cherry pick every bad coaching decision vs every bad play by a defender, QB, RB, etc and there’s no way you can blame it all on coaching.
You assume when I reference coaching Im only talking about in game decisions. I dont know why, I never said that. When I reference coaching Im talking about being a disciplined team that runs a smart scheme and is able to adapt, not overcompensate. We are none of those things. I don't even have to talk about the comedy of errors with our in game management. Because the preceding points are more than enough.
Two games however is good enough for me. 8-4 puts us in contention. So yes coaching will continue to get the majority of the blame from me.
You want to die on that hill be my guest.