Which do you prefer?

DanA said:

Option 1 - 20m worth of D-Line and a rookie WR in the 1st round.

Option 2 - Amari Cooper and a rookie DT with Kinlaw project to go 14 and a maybe to be there.

Option 3 - 20m worth of D-line, a rookie CB in the first and 2nd round WR

I’d take option 3. It fits the draft and IMO gets the most bang for buck.

Click to expand...

cnuball21 said:

Is the money referencing FA spend?

Man thats is tough because the though of losing Cooper is tough bc he’s such a great match for Dak when he’s healthy.

How about:

- Resign Coop
- Mid value FA DT
- Mid value FA S
- Mid value FA DE
- 1st round DB
- 2nd round DT

Assuming we lose Jones to FA...do we think this is doable?

Click to expand...

CATCH17 said:

Option 2

Click to expand...

DanA said:

interesting.

I feel like good rookie WR’s and corners can produce right away but I’m dubious on DT’s and to a lesser extent DE’s producing before their 3rd year. Excluding really early picks like Suh

Click to expand...

CATCH17 said:

WR is one of the tougher positions to transition too..

Actually all 3 of those positions need more then average seasoning then others.

Click to expand...

kevinhickey said:

I think both Dak and Cooper will be resigned. Jones signs a team friendly deal. We draft the highest rated player on our board. Kinlaw will be gone.

Click to expand...

DanA said:

Option 1 - 20m worth of D-Line and a rookie WR in the 1st round.

Option 2 - Amari Cooper and a rookie DT with Kinlaw project to go 14 and a maybe to be there.

Option 3 - 20m worth of D-line, a rookie CB in the first and 2nd round WR

I’d take option 3. It fits the draft and IMO gets the most bang for buck.

Click to expand...