SlammedZero
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,727
- Reaction score
- 40,657
Outside of Parcells, seeing that he was tethered to Garrett almost his entire career as either OC or HC tells me everything I need to know. He gets a pass from me on that alone.
Although it fell apart very quickly, Romo had a line 07 midway through 09, when it fell apart. Down the stretch in 09, that line was horrid, and was even worse in the playoffs. And good ol' Jerry fixed it by trading up for a WR and taking stiff Sam Young in the 6th round. He didn't even notice how bad it was, our great GM!!!Romo never had a line under Parcells?
Flozell, Leonard Davis, Rivera, Gurode, Colombo.....
But you know that’s not true lol.It means he was surrounded by trash players on both sides of the ball.
Yeah, that might be the most incredibly stupid narrative ever posted. Amazing that people keep reiterating something so stupid.Where do you guys keep getting this stupid sabotage theory from? Wade has been fired from every stop he's been at so was he sabotaged every stop?
Right lol. Those losses can’t believe they did him in lol.Yes he was sabotaged by losses at every stop.....
Right. Those defenses got bad. Wade only had one job to do. That was coach defense. If his defense sucked what good was he?Yeah, that might be the most incredibly stupid narrative ever posted. Amazing that people keep reiterating something so stupid.
He did have some bad lines. But the narrative he didn’t have a line is a myth. Those Nate Livings and Bernadeau.......those were bad but Romo didn’t have that his whole career.Although it fell apart very quickly, Romo had a line 07 midway through 09, when it fell apart. Down the stretch in 09, that line was horrid, and was even worse in the playoffs. And good ol' Jerry fixed it by trading up for a WR and taking stiff Sam Young in the 6th round. He didn't even notice how bad it was, our great GM!!!
Due to not maintaining order and not insisting on keeping the players in shape, the players quite simply were out of shape and started folding at the end of games and season.Right. Those defenses got bad. Wade only had one job to do. That was coach defense. If his defense sucked what good was he?
By the looks of the list......seems like maybe Romo wasted some of Garrett's years too.
I ask this because Dak gets the credit for this teams lack of wins against playoff teams this year. But Dak had the same head coach as Garrett......yet....its Dak's fault?
He didn't have a line from late 09 thru 12. I'll never forget pass rushers coming right up the middle at the snap when Ole' Costa was standing there. (I'm not willing to say playing, because it didn't resemble "playing").He did have some bad lines. But the narrative he didn’t have a line is a myth. Those Nate Livings and Bernadeau.......
I wonder why this Romo- Dak thing just goes on and on. No one should care what Romo did, Troy, White, Roger,Morton, Meredith did or didn't do, for some reason it keeps being thrown out to some how justify what Dak is or isn't. The last line of Dak homer-ism is always (insert any former DC QB but mainly Romo) this or (Romo )that when all else fails. If someone liked Romo does that somehow make that person a Dak hater? If someone didn't like Romo does that make someone a Dak lover? And if you did or didn't like both what does that make you? Just curious if you could post what his Wins against Teams with winning records look like his first 4 years as a starter 2006-2009. ThanksAgainst winning teams?
Does this mean anything?
Against winning teams?
Does this mean anything?
I’d probably say 2009 to 11. No one is arguing he had a great line. But Eli didn’t have great lines.....Aaron Rodgers didn’t early on. There were ways to produce while having a average line. It took coaching. Romo was not good enough to compensate for a bad offensive line. He needed players around him.He didn't have a line from late 09 thru 12. I'll never forget pass rushers coming right up the middle at the snap when Ole' Costa was standing there. (I'm not willing to say playing, because it didn't resemble "playing").
I don’t know what they were. Being they sucked most of those years except 2007 I’d assume the records were bad.I wonder why this Romo- Dak thing just goes on and on. No one should care what Romo did, Troy, White, Roger,Morton, Meredith did or didn't do, for some reason it keeps being thrown out to some how justify what Dak is or isn't. The last line of Dak homer-ism is always (insert any former DC QB but mainly Romo) this or (Romo )that when all else fails. If someone liked Romo does that somehow make that person a Dak hater? If someone didn't like Romo does that make someone a Dak lover? And if you did or didn't like both what does that make you? Just curious if you could post what his Wins against Teams with winning records look like his first 4 years as a starter 2006-2009. Thanks
I thought the first years of Romo's career that the cowboys were in cap hell because of the triplets hangover?
If it were not for the fluke on Romo's hold, he would have won a super bowl.
So Aaron has that many because he had a coach?Yes. He was coachless.
That's the results of pass happy play calling. Romo was good but not elite. When you go pass happy with a non-elite QB you'd better have a great defense to bail you out of some bad situations. We just had an 8-8 season from going pass happy with a non-elite QB.Against winning teams?