Did you guys know Romo though 09-16 won 15 games?

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,721
Reaction score
8,722
All I’ve seen was people defending Dak. Not seeing anyone doing what you claim.

I'm not talking about just this thread. People here know each other, seen and replied to each other posts, not just this seasons, but prior seasons. You may not know nor seen what I am talking about, but many others here know what I am talking about.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
I'm not talking about just this thread. People here know each other, seen and replied to each other posts, not just this seasons, but prior seasons. You may not know nor seen what I am talking about, but many others here know what I am talking about.
I have not seen that at all. If it were that rampant then you surely can show one example
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,721
Reaction score
8,722
I have not seen that at all. If it were that rampant then you surely can show one example
you are just as capable as I am to read through thousands of messages to find that one example as I am. Yes, I can do it, but doing so requires time and effort, and quite frankly it's not worth it to find it for you when many people here who are reading this thread know what I am talking about. This board has its Haters and its Homers, extremes on either side, and to assume otherwise is a bit naive.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
you are just as capable as I am to read through thousands of messages to find that one example as I am. Yes, I can do it, but doing so requires time and effort, and quite frankly it's not worth it to find it for you when many people here who are reading this thread know what I am talking about. This board has its Haters and its Homers, extremes on either side, and to assume otherwise is a bit naive.
Ok. You have no proof. Thanks!!!
 

Hennessy_King

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,623
Reaction score
25,418
The bit humorous part to this is ;) is that some people who believe that about the romo contract want to give Dak contract to put that contract to shame, no matter how it would handicap the team. I mean I see a lot of hypocrisy from people calling others hypocrites, and that is part of what I found amusing about the original thread itself, people being guilty of what they accuse others of.
Romos contract killed us because he was injured and not playing. Then retired i knew the 5 year extension was a terrible idea when they did it
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Romos contract killed us because he was injured and not playing. Then retired i knew the 5 year extension was a terrible idea when they did it
Yea. You’re right. But you don’t see them crying about that tho. When it comes to Dak getting paid they act like it’s their money he’s getting. What’s the reasoning for this?
 

LocoBates

Well-Known Member
Messages
259
Reaction score
273
Against winning teams?

EPGeifZXsAEtffG


Does this mean anything?

It means that during a certain period of time Romo and Dakota could not beat more than 15 teams with a winning record. It means that to this date Dakota and Romo have the same number of SB rings and Playoffs wins. It means that whatever negative you say about Romo also applies to Dakota
Now... Move on!
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,177
Reaction score
69,135
It means that during a certain period of time Romo and Dakota could not beat more than 15 teams with a winning record. It means that to this date Dakota and Romo have the same number of SB rings and Playoffs wins. It means that whatever negative you say about Romo also applies to Dakota
Now... Move on!
You dudes get so caught up in defending Romo that you don't even realize what this thread was about lol. I've stated it numerous times.....and no I will not move on. You can either participate in the thread or move on.
 

LocoBates

Well-Known Member
Messages
259
Reaction score
273
How many playoff wins?
Same as Dakota.
And both have the same number of SB rings, so I don't know what the point is
One QB took more than 10 years to get 0 SB rings while the other only took him 4 years so I guess the current QB is better?, is the speed to get 0 what we are comparing? I am sorry I am confused with all this nonsense.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,177
Reaction score
69,135
Same as Dakota.
And both have the same number of SB rings, so I don't know what the point is
One QB took more than 10 years to get 0 SB rings while the other only took him 4 years so I guess the current QB is better?, is the speed to get 0 what we are comparing? I am sorry I am confused with all this nonsense.
I've said it NUMEROUS TIMES.

The thread is about the continuing trend we find ourselves in. This is a TEAM GAME. You lose as a TEAM. You win as a TEAM. If we are noticing that one QB took 10 years to get 0 rings.....and our new quarterback is at 4 years and 0 rings...how about we fix the problem before he goes 10 years with 0 rings as well? Like how is this so tough to understand? I really don't get it. You guys don't see the common denominator here?
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
I've said it NUMEROUS TIMES.

The thread is about the continuing trend we find ourselves in. This is a TEAM GAME. You lose as a TEAM. You win as a TEAM. If we are noticing that one QB took 10 years to get 0 rings.....and our new quarterback is at 4 years and 0 rings...how about we fix the problem before he goes 10 years with 0 rings as well? Like how is this so tough to understand? I really don't get it. You guys don't see the common denominator here?
When people have been raised a certain way they only see things that excuse their way of thinking or berate and disrespect what they oppose. It’s a sickness bro. Deep rooted with ignorance. This Lame fails to realize that vast improvement can take place within the next few years and Dak may wind up with the better team resume and possibly a championship. He has 6 more seasons before it’s his tenth and regardless to what these yeehaws say, Dak can end up quarterbacking a championship team. Only time will tell.
 

LocoBates

Well-Known Member
Messages
259
Reaction score
273
Which part are you referring to?
That both QBs have the same number of PO wins and SB rings. If both have achieved the same 0 SB wins, shouldn't the same positive or negative be shared equally? if 0 = 0 why one would get it and not the other?
although you mention TEAM on the 23rd page, earlier on the thread you mentioned your disagreement on how people criticize Dakota for not being able to beat winning teams this season, yet people forget about the stat you posted, thus effectively making this a QB comparison (hence my comment about the equal results for both QBs).

I've said it NUMEROUS TIMES.

The thread is about the continuing trend we find ourselves in. This is a TEAM GAME. You lose as a TEAM. You win as a TEAM. If we are noticing that one QB took 10 years to get 0 rings.....and our new quarterback is at 4 years and 0 rings...how about we fix the problem before he goes 10 years with 0 rings as well? Like how is this so tough to understand? I really don't get it. You guys don't see the common denominator here?

TEAM and learn from our mistakes (got it - check)

Funny, but don't tell us, tell Dakota, he is the one that wants to be the best player paid ever in the NFL. He doesn't want to take a lower contract to allow the FO to address other TEAM needs. It seems as if everybody but Dakota knew how much he needs that TEAM in order to put some descent games.

Not long ago the 1st excuse was that #4 needs his RB back (Zeke suspension), Second was then #4 needed receivers (fire Dez give 1st round pick for Coop),then OC sucks (Fire SL promote Moore the genius that later in the season sucked and got figured) latest one was #4 needs a new coach (fire Garret, hire a GB fired MC), now he wants to be the best QB ever payed in NFL, pending to fulfill his latest request everything has been served in silver plate, yet no playoffs or SB ring, I know only time will tell.... but honestly I can't think what the next excuse will be, maybe that "playing tagged distracted him all season not allowing him to focus on accuracy"? the only sure thing is that J Jones will not base his decision on a TEAM and he will repeat his own mistakes over and over again so most likely the QB will get what he wants... at the expense of the TEAM.





 
Top