Making the call now: Fulton at 17

there are some good CBs out there after Rd1
☆Damon Arnette,Ohio St
☆Lamar Jackson,Nebraska
☆Dane Jackson,Pitt
☆Debione Renfro,Texas A&M
☆Lavert Hill,Michigan
☆Mike Hampton,S Florida
☆Parnell Motley,Ou
☆Damon Hayes,Rutgers

really intrigued by A&Ms Renfro...6'2...solid in coverage...very physical...and we have his DB coach now.
might be a name to remember.
be cool to have a Renfro back there again.

Fulton is a reluctant tackler...ill pass.

Fulton's got some pretty high-end man cover talent IMO. Don't know what coverage scheme Nolan prefers, but if we're still doing press-man, he could probably slide in Day 1 into Jones's old spot (assuming we don't resign Byron; I'm about 90% sure he's gone).

A day 1 starter with a Pro Bowl ceiling at pick 17? I'm on board.

To be honest, the more guys I watch the more and more I like this draft class. As it is, I don't think we could screw up with any of the potential guys at 17. Kinlaw, Chaisson, Fulton, Delpit, a WR... The only guy in that group I don't like is Delpit, and I don't think he's bad so much as he's just currently rated too high. I don't hate his tape the same way I hated Taco's.

so tired of rd 1 CB's, I'd take a pure speed play making WR like Ruggs or Reagor even though WR is not a major need.

I’d be ok with Fulton I like him over other CBs like Diggs or Henderson. I’d much rather go D-Line at 17.

Jeff Gladney out of TCU is my favorite CB in this class but he’s a reach at 17 but won’t be there at 51.

If BJ walks I’m fine with Fulton. Very solid cover with back to back above over average seasons in the SEC.

J-man said:

so tired of rd 1 CB's, I'd take a pure speed play making WR like Ruggs or Reagor even though WR is not a major need.

Click to expand...

The problem is we have 3 cb who are FA and 2 more next year
You got to get CB’s at some point
I prefer DT at 17, not interested in WR at 17
We are most likely keeping cooper so the new kid would not be playing very much because I think Cobb is a lock to come back
I could see a WR taken but not at 17

conner01 said:

The problem is we have 3 cb who are FA and 2 more next year
You got to get CB’s at some point
I prefer DT at 17, not interested in WR at 17
We are most likely keeping cooper so the new kid would not be playing very much because I think Cobb is a lock to come back
I could see a WR taken but not at 17

Click to expand...

Agree with this...even if we don't resign Cobb the draft is loaded at WR, and it will be easy to get a very solid value in round 3 or even 4.

I think we're going to have a really good defender available at 17 that fits a need.

I am calling it now...... no to this