Not guaranteeing the validity of this, but Jeff Cavanaugh just mentioned that the pick at 17 would have been Diggs if we didn’t pick Lamb, not...
SO this award is for the total package, right? The Tanking and the Doing it for the specific purpose of getting Lawrence, correct? Just clarifying...
Also not a fan of how to spell losing, it seems
In which month were they able to see him during a game? Preseason? How many preseason games were there this year?
And the alternative? Do you not want us to have more cap space?
But would a bidding war and eventual winning bid change the revenue for the NFL, and thus help the salary cap? With the down year wew are supposed...
I think you need to re-post this in giant red letters. Maybe...just maybe... it will sink in then.
It is possible to get a old style flashing...
Always enjoyed his posts . RIP Jobber
Depends on where in NJ. North no. South yes
This is true. But Carr is a stand up guy and I believe he gave his honest assessment regardless. What that assessment was, we don't yet know.
You could very well be right, though I do think the 'after week one' is still a factor, if only as a message to team and ET that he's easily...
This is exactly what I've been saying. I agree completely.
Gee! Activated for the weekend, when we can have 55 players and 48 active. Then he goes back down during the week.
His spot on the practice squad?
This is exactly what I'd been thinking from the moment we brought Carr in. We know Carr is a stand up guy and he'd no motive to be anything but...
This!?! Sure would be a big troll by eatman
He could be on the PS and be one of the two called up each week. According to Fish (if you trust that source) Carr would be on the PS.
I posted this in the other thread, but it fits here as well.
This is a pretty interesting situation to me. I may not have everything...
I guess we will find today if that 'Carr to PS' story Fish mentioned is true.
Thanks. I hope it works out that way.