ROMO VS WARNER
Although it seems Romo seems to be lighting the world on fire, that 99 version of Warner was VERY good and comparing the 99 warner to the 06 Romo, Warner comes out ahead. But I do see Romo possibly being better!
Jones and Barber vs Faulk
Although Barber and Jones are very effective, Faulk IMO is one of the Greatest backs to live, this guy was GREAT. And IMO I would rather have the 99 Faulk rather than our duo now.
Owens VS Bruce
Owens has the more physical I think you would want and is a very good reciever. Bruce is extremely clutch and you can always rely on him. I think you get more big play out of Owens, whereas in Bruce you get reliability and consistent performance. Bruce will be known as one of the greatest Recievers as he should be. But I would take owns, just because of that big play ability.
Glenn VS Holt A.K.A. Big Game
Plain and simple. HOLT >>>>>>>>>Glenn. I don't really think there is an argument against. They are similar, but I would kick Glenn to the curb for HOLT any day.
Crayton vs Proehl
I'm split on this one because both can be reliable but Proehl was ol' reliable. But I see a lot of upside in Crayton so I'll call this a tie.
Witten vs Conwell
Witten over Conwell all day everyday!!!
But, fact is until we win a superbowl our team really doesn't compare to there's at all.
