10 Positives and Negatives from today's game

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Pass protection is NOT subpar. I was timing each snap with a stop watch on both sides of the ball all game long. We consistently gave Romo more than 2.8 seconds to throw which is outstanding in the NFL. And when he got sacked one time...it was on him for not throwing the ball away. Another time he had to make a play....it was not good protection, but a healthy Romo would have easily evaded the play.

We dominated in the trenches as Locker didn't have nearly the time to throw that Romo did all game long.




YR
 

diehard2294

America's Team
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
593
I noticed that Wilber seemed to get more snaps at DE than last week. Actually, I don't remember him getting any snaps at DE last week.

I thought he got good pressure when he did. I thought he looked so good at LB in camp ?
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,527
Reaction score
29,874
Romo's acuracy on short throws is troubling.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
Jake Locker was so horrid today it's hard to make a great judgement about the defense. They played well against what they were playing against, so it's hard to be negative.

Troy Aikman couldn't stop commenting on how Locker was unable to hit to minimum bar for NFL passing -- and I tend to agree with him.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
Jake Locker was so horrid today it's hard to make a great judgement about the defense. They played well against what they were playing against, so it's hard to be negative.

Troy Aikman couldn't stop commenting on how Locker was unable to hit to minimum bar for NFL passing -- and I tend to agree with him.

he was horrid the first half but got better in the 2nd half but it was too late by then,he had plenty of time to make throws too.
 

Fla Cowpoke

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,025
Reaction score
12,046
Positives:
1. We won the game, no matter how pretty or ugly you play, a W counts the same
2. We had great balance on offense
3. Our run blocking was outstanding on all but a couple of plays
4. Murray beasted today
5. Romo with no turnovers
6. Dez had a huge game
7. Our defense recorded 3 turnovers, 2 ints and 1 on downs
8. We owned the ball today, over 41 minutes of time of possession
9. We ran the ball and with success in the red zone
10. Bailey is absolutely money

Negatives:
1. Romo still looks off, his throws are high or low and have far less zip than they used to
2. Murray fumbled again
3. Our D got abused again by the opposing TE
4. Though our D got some push, we just couldn't seem to get all the way to Locker to record sacks
5. Randle got hurt
6. McClain was robbed of a potential TD by a premature whistle
7. Our pass protection is quite subpar, and is magnified at the moment with Romo's current lack of mobility
8. The Wilcox stinger, though it doesn't appear to be too serious, as he came back
9. We had a poor start to the 2nd half, especially on defense
10. I don't have a 10th negative, so I will use this.....I now have to wait 7 days to see the Cowboys play again.

Great post and yes, it is nice not to have to scrape to make positive comments.

Today the defense looked like a team playing the Tampa 2. Not sure how much we played it to be honest, but we were making them throw the ball in front of us and we had several guys collapsing on the receiver immediately after the catch. The one exception was Walker's long TD but that should have been a 20 yd completion....not a 60 yd TD. Can't really nitpick any of the positives.

You didn't even mention ST as a positive, but they were exceptional in pretty much every aspect today. Randle had two nice tackles early, Harris looked great and Tenn really didn't get much in the way of positives on ST. Bailey is just ridiculously good. All decent length kicks today and what is amazing to me is that his kicks ALL split the uprights. It's pretty uncanny....I can't remember watching another kicker who consistently puts it within a yard or two either way on every kick.

I know Romo is getting a lot of grief but today is exactly what almost everyone said we needed from him. Bus driver, no critical mistakes, let the run game do their thing and get out of town with a win. We did just that but everyone is complaining. I think teams are definitely playing us more as a passing offense so they are still mainly only playing 7 in the box and playing more coverage. As we continue to have success, teams are going to have to start shifting more towards stopping our run game. This should open up the passing game. Romo does need to stretch the field some and I do think there are some concerns in that regard.

The Titans made an adjustment at halftime, opened things up and spread the field more. People were posting negative comments about how we didn't adjust for the second half. It doesn't work that way....the team that is having success generally doesn't come out with something different. So the Titans had more success initially and then we changed what we were doing and stopped them the rest of the way. The one Walker drive was pretty much it and that came on poor tackling, not because of a scheme issue.

One little thing is that I really don't see what Dunbar brings to the offense. I don't see any exceptional qualities....I really would love to see Ryan Williams brought up.

It is exciting to think that we could get some decent additions over the next few weeks with Scandrick, maybe Spencer and hopefully guys like Melton, Terrell McClain and Selvie continue to shake the rust off and get healthy.

Best thing is no major injuries.....hope Randle is just a short term thing.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
another positive

jeff heath with a great special team's tackle and an absolute perfect textbook hit on the receiver while filling in for wilcox.
 

maxdallasfan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
1,528
If we don't start going deep, then the run game is going to suffer.

I still think Romos back is messed up.

I still think that if he hurts it again, Mrs. Romo is going to have something to say about his playing career.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Pass protection is NOT subpar. I was timing each snap with a stop watch on both sides of the ball all game long. We consistently gave Romo more than 2.8 seconds to throw which is outstanding in the NFL. And when he got sacked one time...it was on him for not throwing the ball away. Another time he had to make a play....it was not good protection, but a healthy Romo would have easily evaded the play.

We dominated in the trenches as Locker didn't have nearly the time to throw that Romo did all game long.




YR
Uhhh...no. Pass protection was horrible. They were not picking up any blitzes -- at all. Romo was scrambling too much, too quickly.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
Uhhh...no. Pass protection was horrible. They were not picking up any blitzes -- at all. Romo was scrambling too much, too quickly.
Usually it was Free, once it was Frederick. Mostly it was the inability to pick up the blitz.

Run blocking was outstanding though.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Uhhh...no. Pass protection was horrible. They were not picking up any blitzes -- at all. Romo was scrambling too much, too quickly.

You didn't time the passes...I did. We were consistently getting 2.8+ seconds which is good in the NFL. Locker OTOH was consistently getting less than 2.5 seconds.

And picking up the blitzes is often times a function of the RB's responsibility, the QB picking up where the free man may come from and the play design to get a receiver open quickly so the QB can get the ball out of his hand before the blitzer(s) get to him.





YR
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
You didn't time the passes...I did. We were consistently getting 2.8+ seconds which is good in the NFL. Locker OTOH was consistently getting less than 2.5 seconds.

And picking up the blitzes is often times a function of the RB's responsibility, the QB picking up where the free man may come from and the play design to get a receiver open quickly so the QB can get the ball out of his hand before the blitzer(s) get to him.





YR
I don't mean to offend, but what you timed doesn't really mean a thing in any analysis whatsoever.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
I don't mean to offend, but what you timed doesn't really mean a thing in any analysis whatsoever.

Well, it's a big part of football. If you get 3.1 seconds on 3rd and 8 and take a sack...generally that means the O-Line did a sufficient job. And you're kidding yourself if you don't think coaches look at that.

And it sure beats just claiming that 'the O-Line protection was subpar' because they gave up sacks and some hits. Well, that's going to happen when your QB doesn't get rid of the ball as you approach 3.0 seconds from the snap.




YR
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
Romo looks off. His back is obviously still an issue. But if we can lean on the running game, it'll hopefully mitigate the back issue.

That's what this team should have been doing seven years ago. I hate we wasted much of Romo's playing career. But maybe it's better late than never.
 

cowboyschmps3

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,371
Reaction score
1,880
You guys think Missing Scandrick is why there hasn't been much covering tight ends? I thought we would move Carr inside too take on the tight end but no left him with Wilcox and it was obvious how bad the coverage was.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
I have been pro-dunbar since we signed him, but so far I am disappointed. If Randle is hurt for any length of time, I think it is our best interest to bring up Williams from the practice squad.
 

goshan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,656
Reaction score
888
Well, it's a big part of football. If you get 3.1 seconds on 3rd and 8 and take a sack...generally that means the O-Line did a sufficient job. And you're kidding yourself if you don't think coaches look at that.

And it sure beats just claiming that 'the O-Line protection was subpar' because they gave up sacks and some hits. Well, that's going to happen when your QB doesn't get rid of the ball as you approach 3.0 seconds from the snap.


YR

Your watch must have been broken. The pass protection wasn't very good. And our pressure on Locker was mediocre.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
The passing game needs to be adjusted due to Romo's limitations (back). The staff needs to go to a quicker passing game with shorter routes so Romo can get rid of the ball quicker and throw fewer long and intermediate passes. Peyton is a prime example. In Denver's offense he gets rid of the ball very quickly to compensate for his lack of mobility/injury history/age. Denver's offense still works pretty well. LOL. I know Tony isn't Peyton, but the passing game can still be adjusted to help him out.
 
Top