10 Reasons why we should Draft Joe Staley

acruther

Active Member
Messages
114
Reaction score
28
  1. The guy is a physical freak. 6"6', 306 and runs a 4.75 forty. He benched one less rep than Joe Thomas - top 10 rated Joe Thomas. Several coaches on hand at his pro day stated it was one of the best workouts by an offensive lineman they had ever witnessed. He could end up being the best OT in this draft.
  2. He is a legitimate left tackle prospect. This means we can finally replace underperforming Flozell Adams (in 2008). Further, his speed will allow him to deal with the speed rushers that have eaten Adams alive.
  3. We are not in a position where we have to start Staley immediately. We can give Staley a year to get stronger and work in with the current offensive line. Then in 2008 he will be ready to take over. If he is not, then we still have the option to keep Adams.
  4. Staley's speed and athleticism will allow us to have a ton of flexibility with our running game. Last year, we had one guy who could pull well - Kosier. Columbo was OK at it as well. Adams, Rivera, Gurode - please. With Leonard Davis, Kosier, and Staley on the roster, we could have 3 guys who can block in space. This is great because we could run screens and counters to both sides of the line.
  5. Staley is a smart player who could very well play guard for us this season. The guy played TE, RT, and LT in college, a fact that actually hurts his draft grade (he's had less experience at LT). However, this kind of flexiblity will serve him well in Dallas.
  6. Staley had a sprained ankle in college. That's it. He's got his original knees. So we're drafting a very healthy player. Always a good sign.
  7. 3 out of our 5 starting offensive lineman are free agents. None of our starters are on their rookie contracts. As a result, we are sucking up a ton of our cap in the OLine. We need to get younger, cheaper, and more athletic on the OLine and Staley accomplishes that.
  8. The quality of offensive linemen drops off precipitously after the mid second round. Depth at WR and CB is much better. I don't see anyone who we can draft who will definitely start for us this year (except possibly Blalock or Nelson). So if we're drafting for the future, there are few positions as important as LT.
  9. Our policy of not drafting offensive linemen early has not worked. The guys we've taken in the 2nd and 3rd rounds have not worked out for the most part. Obviously Gurode and Adams are the most recent exceptions, but the list of failures is a much, much longer list. Jones needs to revisit this assumption of his. LT is one of the elite positions in the NFL and it's worth investing a 1st round pick in one.
  10. Games are won in the trenches. It's a plattitude, I realize, but it is undeniably true. If we continue to invest in our OLine, we will improve all our offensive skill position players as a matter of course.
  11. EDIT: Vela did a great analysis showing that tackles had one of the lowest bust rates of 1st round picks. (http://theboysblog.com/2007/03/25/bust-factors-offense/)
http://img441.*************/img441/1724/2007draftny1.gif
________________________________________________________________________________
 

Sonny Koufax

Well-Known Member
Messages
336
Reaction score
286
Awesome post. Loved the picks at the bottom. I wouldn't have aproblem with Staley, I think we've overlooked our line problems for far too long.
 

acruther

Active Member
Messages
114
Reaction score
28
Sonny Koufax;1440749 said:
Awesome post. Loved the picks at the bottom. I wouldn't have aproblem with Staley, I think we've overlooked our line problems for far too long.

Gratz. I'm all for a WR (Bowe, Meachem), but when I stop and really think about it, I can justify this pick alot easier. I really think it's the way to go.
 

acruther

Active Member
Messages
114
Reaction score
28
Bob Sacamano;1440757 said:
I like your thinking acruther

Staley and McQuistan would be ideal bookends at OT

McQuistan?!?!!?! Baby-eater?

I don't put much faith in 6th and 7th round picks to develop into anything except solid depth. Columbo is our RT of the future for what I've seen. He's not a star, but he was very solid last year and I think still has some upside. He's never been healthy before last year, so considering his limited playing time to date, I think he played really well.
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
I like the kid more and more every day at #22. I'd take him over Jerrett i can tell you that.

My (reasonable) guys at #22

Bowe, Meachem
Staley
Revis, Houston, Nelson
Moss, Spencer
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
acruther;1440763 said:
McQuistan?!?!!?! Baby-eater?

I don't put much faith in 6th and 7th round picks to develop into anything except solid depth. Columbo is our RT of the future for what I've seen. He's not a star, but he was very solid last year and I think still has some upside. He's never been healthy before last year, so considering his limited playing time to date, I think he played really well.


Go back over our history and there are VERY few who turned out to be much aftert the 5th. Most that did, did with other teams. http://databasefootball.com/draft/draftteam.htm?tm=DAL&lg=nfl
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
acruther;1440763 said:
McQuistan?!?!!?! Baby-eater?

I don't put much faith in 6th and 7th round picks to develop into anything except solid depth. Columbo is our RT of the future for what I've seen. He's not a star, but he was very solid last year and I think still has some upside. He's never been healthy before last year, so considering his limited playing time to date, I think he played really well.

idk, but McQ's skill-set makes him an upgrade over Colombo, if he ever gets down the nuances of playing OT IMO

don't get me wrong, I like Colombo, was pressing for him to re-sign and was glad as hell when he did, but he's a little limited athletically and is replaceable
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
Bob Sacamano;1440783 said:
idk, but McQ's skill-set makes him an upgrade over Colombo, if he ever gets down the nuances of playing OT IMO

don't get me wrong, I like Colombo, was pressing for him to re-sign and was glad as hell when he did, but he's a little limited athletically and is replaceable


The thing that encourages me is his identical twin brother was day 1 material(3rd). The only reason Pat is a little more raw is he took a year off to pitch. I think the kid has starting ability on the NFL level.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Big Dakota;1440789 said:
The thing that encourages me is his identical twin brother was day 1 material(3rd). The only reason Pat is a little more raw is he took a year off to pitch. I think the kid has starting ability on the NFL level.

2 years at a DivII school is not going to prepare you, McQ is definitely a project who's a ways off from starting, but the potential is there, as is the time-frame for him to prepare
 

Rockytop6

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
84
Well thought out post. Good job. I sure would like to get Staley but only if he is the best player on our board when it is our time to pick.

Ideally, I would love to trade down to a lower pick in round one and and have two second rd picks giving us 3 picks in the first two rounds. Staley, Rice or top rated WR on our board and an edge rusher DL/Lb.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
A lot of people are hoping McQ makes it. He'd be a lot cheaper than going out and getting another quality LT. Heck, anybody starting.

I'm not sure how Staley's 40 times will help him block better. Let's draft him and put him at end. :D
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
jobberone;1440799 said:
A lot of people are hoping McQ makes it. He'd be a lot cheaper than going out and getting another quality LT. Heck, anybody starting.

I'm not sure how Staley's 40 times will help him block better. Let's draft him and put him at end. :D

Staley had alot of good times, give me a sec to post them
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Staley's Pro Day workout

1.64 10-yard dash
4.4 short-shuttle
7.09 3-cone drill
2.73 20-yard dash
32" vertical
9'4" long-jump

but I agree that there's more to it than just numbers, but Staley was real good at CMU
 

J32969

New Member
Messages
18
Reaction score
13
I think Staley or a corner like Houston / Revis has got to be where Dallas looks. I say draft the LT of the future with Staley.
 

acruther

Active Member
Messages
114
Reaction score
28
jobberone;1440799 said:
A lot of people are hoping McQ makes it. He'd be a lot cheaper than going out and getting another quality LT. Heck, anybody starting.

I'm not sure how Staley's 40 times will help him block better. Let's draft him and put him at end. :D

The 40 time demonstrates his athleticism (which is isn't really in question) and that he will be able to block in space. Thus, you can pull him to the other side of the formation on running plays to get an additional blocker at the point of attacks. Further, he would be invalable in running screens to his side because he can get out there quickly and engage blockers to free the RB (or TE or WR).
 
Top