- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
CB
WR
RB
I think most agree that those are the three most critical needs on this team... The question that has been and will continue to be debated until the actual draft is what positions do the Cowboys target in the first round?
CB & WR?
CB & RB?
RB & WR?
We keep hearing that the CB position is deep in this draft...
We keep hearing that the RB position is deep in this draft...
It appears that the WR class isn't as deep as the other two positions. But does that mean we should take a WR in the first round just because the position isn't as deep as the other two?
I'm sure different people will have different opinions on what positions we focus on in the first round-- and will have their own rationale for doing so.
Here's mine...
A first round corner is likely to become the #3 corner on this team, without much effort.
A first round running back is likely to become the #2 running back on this team without much effort.
A first round wide receiver? I'm not sure where this player would rank in comparison to the other wide receivers. #2? Maybe. But Crayton has a new contract and put up decent numbers last year. Plus wide receivers seem to have a much longer learning curve than other positions. #3 WR is probably more likey-- but even that isn't a "lock". From all indications, the Cowboy's brain trust is high on last year's 4th round pick.
The fact is that while it's very easy to project where a 1st round corner would contribute to this team in year #1, along with what a 1st round running back would contribute. It gets a little more dicey figuring the contributions of a 1st round wideout.
Another way I'm looking at it is if we needed to "buy" a quality 3rd corner in free agency or a quality 2nd running back or let's go for broke and say we are going to invest in a #2 WR during the free agency period? Which position would be the most expensive to fill?
I think a 3rd corner hand's down.
Up to this point it appears that receivers especially do worse in free agency (in other words make less money) as compared to just about any other position.
All in all, even though the wide receiver class doesn't appear to be as deep as the running back or corner class in this draft, I think it makes more sense to select a corner and a back in the first round and the wide receiver later.
The wide receiver/back debate I think is pretty clear cut in that it's easy to project a #2 running back getting to touch the ball 10-12 times a game, where even a #2 wide receiver is going to only going to get 4-5 touches per game in this offense.
What two positions do you think the Cowboys target in the first round and why?
WR
RB
I think most agree that those are the three most critical needs on this team... The question that has been and will continue to be debated until the actual draft is what positions do the Cowboys target in the first round?
CB & WR?
CB & RB?
RB & WR?
We keep hearing that the CB position is deep in this draft...
We keep hearing that the RB position is deep in this draft...
It appears that the WR class isn't as deep as the other two positions. But does that mean we should take a WR in the first round just because the position isn't as deep as the other two?
I'm sure different people will have different opinions on what positions we focus on in the first round-- and will have their own rationale for doing so.
Here's mine...
A first round corner is likely to become the #3 corner on this team, without much effort.
A first round running back is likely to become the #2 running back on this team without much effort.
A first round wide receiver? I'm not sure where this player would rank in comparison to the other wide receivers. #2? Maybe. But Crayton has a new contract and put up decent numbers last year. Plus wide receivers seem to have a much longer learning curve than other positions. #3 WR is probably more likey-- but even that isn't a "lock". From all indications, the Cowboy's brain trust is high on last year's 4th round pick.
The fact is that while it's very easy to project where a 1st round corner would contribute to this team in year #1, along with what a 1st round running back would contribute. It gets a little more dicey figuring the contributions of a 1st round wideout.
Another way I'm looking at it is if we needed to "buy" a quality 3rd corner in free agency or a quality 2nd running back or let's go for broke and say we are going to invest in a #2 WR during the free agency period? Which position would be the most expensive to fill?
I think a 3rd corner hand's down.
Up to this point it appears that receivers especially do worse in free agency (in other words make less money) as compared to just about any other position.
All in all, even though the wide receiver class doesn't appear to be as deep as the running back or corner class in this draft, I think it makes more sense to select a corner and a back in the first round and the wide receiver later.
The wide receiver/back debate I think is pretty clear cut in that it's easy to project a #2 running back getting to touch the ball 10-12 times a game, where even a #2 wide receiver is going to only going to get 4-5 touches per game in this offense.
What two positions do you think the Cowboys target in the first round and why?