4 reasons why we win tomorrow and advance to the NFC championship for the first time since 1996

[CowboysFanSince88]

Since 11/21, these were the last four offenses the Packers defense faced on the...ROAD.

At Wash-....(Kirk Cousins, 375 yds passing, 3 TD passes)-(RB Robert Kelly, 137 yds, 3 TD runs)

At Philly......(QB Carson wentz-254 yds passing)-GB only led 17-13 in 3rd qtr

At Chicago.....(QB Matt Barkley-362 yds,2 TD)-(RB Josh Howard, 90 yds rushing)-Game tied at 27 in 4th

At Detroit-(QB Matthew Stafford-347 yds passing, 2 TD)......GB only led 23-17 in the 4th qtr



So the media is trying to hype up the winning streak and overlook what those offenses did to the Packers defense on the road. I think we all believe that the Dak and Zeke combo is just as good as the Bears Matt Barkley/howard and Skins Cousins/Kelly. lol

WE GOT THIS!!!

 

[CATCH17]

It really is Aaron Rodgers vs an entire team.


Our roster is much better than theirs but he is so ridiculously good that it closes the gap.

 

[reddyuta]

It really is Aaron Rodgers vs an entire team.


Our roster is much better than theirs but he is so ridiculously good that it closes the gap.

we can still win if he throws for 4 TDs and over 300 provided our Offense is in top gear.

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

It really is Aaron Rodgers vs an entire team.


Our roster is much better than theirs but he is so ridiculously good that it closes the gap.

This post is not about Aaron rodgers. It's about the washington and chicago offense who had good games against the Packers defense and missed the playoffs. So that should let you know what our offense is about to do

 

[Kevinicus]

This post is not about Aaron rodgers. It's about the washington and chicago offense who had good games against the Packers defense and missed the playoffs. So that should let you know what our offense is about to do

Two of your examples showed low scores by the other team.

Your "analysis" covers one aspect of football. The aspect that nobody really argues with (Dallas doing well against their D). Unfortunately, it completely ignores the other, very pertinent, aspects of the game.

Not surprising.

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

Two of your examples showed low scores by the other team.

Your "analysis" covers one aspect of football. The aspect that nobody really argues with (Dallas doing well against their D). Unfortunately, it completely ignores the other, very pertinent, aspects of the game.

Not surprising.

Right, I am focusing on how bad offenses moved the ball on the Packers defense on their home field. That is what is being overlooked in this winning streak. Green Bay is not playing in Lambeau tomorrow and their defense will have to try and stop a much better offense on the road.

 

[MRV52]

Since 11/21, these were the last four offenses the Packers defense faced on the...ROAD.

At Wash-....(Kirk Cousins, 375 yds passing, 3 TD passes)-(RB Robert Kelly, 137 yds, 3 TD runs)

At Philly......(QB Carson wentz-254 yds passing)-GB only led 17-13 in 3rd qtr

At Chicago.....(QB Matt Barkley-362 yds,2 TD)-(RB Josh Howard, 90 yds rushing)-Game tied at 27 in 4th

At Detroit-(QB Matthew Stafford-347 yds passing, 2 TD)......GB only led 23-17 in the 4th qtr



So the media is trying to hype up the winning streak and overlook what those offenses did to the Packers defense on the road. I think we all believe that the Dak and Zeke combo is just as good as the Bears Matt Barkley/howard and Skins Cousins/Kelly. lol

WE GOT THIS!!!

I posted about this in another thread where I listed there last 7 games that they played. I wasn't entirely sold on them and they should have lost to Chicago. this stat is interesting.

The packers are 1 -5 when they have played against teams with a top 10 offence.

 

[Kevinicus]

Right, I am focusing on how bad offenses moved the ball on the Packers defense on their home field. That is what is being overlooked in this winning streak. Green Bay is not playing in Lambeau tomorrow and their defense will have to try and stop a much better offense on the road.

2 bad offenses scored few points - that doesn't help your argument.

Washington was a good offense - doesn't help your argument.

Chicago is a good example.

Unfortunately, GB's defense is not the only part of the team playing tomorrow.

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

I posted about this in another thread where I listed there last 7 games that they played. I wasn't entirely sold on them and they should have lost to Chicago. this stat is interesting.

The packers are 1 -5 when they have played against teams with a top 10 offence.

No need to focus on the last 7, just the last 4 road games since they will be in Dallas. And you can clearly see how their defense plays on the road

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

2 bad offenses scored few points - that doesn't help your argument.

Washington was a good offense - doesn't help your argument.

Chicago is a good example.

Unfortunately, GB's defense is not the only part of the team playing tomorrow.

Did not see the note about the Eagles and Lions game? Those crappy offenses was good enough to still be in the game in the 4th qtr.

And if washington is a good offense what is Dallas????

 

[MRV52]

No need to focus on the last 7, just the last 4 road games since they will be in Dallas. And you can clearly see how their defense plays on the road

My argument is that they are 1 and 5 when playing against a top 10 offense. which is more telling.

 

[Kevinicus]

Did not see the note about the Eagles and Lions game? Those crappy offenses was good enough to still be in the game in the 4th qtr.

And if washington is a good offense what is Dallas????

You still don'y understand the game.

If it's 6-3 in the 4th, it doesn't mean the team with 3 pts is doing well because they are in the game. There is nothing impressive about 13 and 17 pts.

Dallas is a good offense. They should do well.

You know who else has a good offense? Green Bay.

 

[rockj7]

Since 11/21, these were the last four offenses the Packers defense faced on the...ROAD.

At Wash-....(Kirk Cousins, 375 yds passing, 3 TD passes)-(RB Robert Kelly, 137 yds, 3 TD runs)

At Philly......(QB Carson wentz-254 yds passing)-GB only led 17-13 in 3rd qtr

At Chicago.....(QB Matt Barkley-362 yds,2 TD)-(RB Josh Howard, 90 yds rushing)-Game tied at 27 in 4th

At Detroit-(QB Matthew Stafford-347 yds passing, 2 TD)......GB only led 23-17 in the 4th qtr



So the media is trying to hype up the winning streak and overlook what those offenses did to the Packers defense on the road. I think we all believe that the Dak and Zeke combo is just as good as the Bears Matt Barkley/howard and Skins Cousins/Kelly. lol

WE GOT THIS!!!

Man 1996 was a long time ago here is what took place in the year 1996 https://popculturemadness.com/PCM/1996/1996-history-trivia-and-fun-facts/

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

My argument is that they are 1 and 5 when playing against a top 10 offense. which is more telling.

That's a good point too.

 

[gmoney112]

Matt Barkley had 360 yards

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

You still don'y understand the game.

If it's 6-3 in the 4th, it doesn't mean the team with 3 pts is doing well because they are in the game. There is nothing impressive about 13 and 17 pts.

Dallas is a good offense. They should do well.

You know who else has a good offense? Green Bay.

Without Jordy Nelson? And what that GB offense do in Lambeau? Stop letting the media control your mind

 

[TRUTH87]

all i kno is i cant ****en sleep lol

 

[Kevinicus]

Without Jordy Nelson? And what that GB offense do in Lambeau? Stop letting the media control your mind

Who cares about the Media?

If Rodgers played back then like he has been, they score 30+. And they scored 38 without Nelson against a much tougher defense.

 

[CowboysFanSince88]

Who cares about the Media?

If Rodgers played back then like he has been, they score 30+. And they scored 38 without Nelson against a much tougher defense.

So you a packers fan? why the heck are on this board?

 

[guag]

all i kno is i cant ****en sleep lol