EST_1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,194
- Reaction score
- 14,669
Yea now that was beyond dumbI thought trying the 60 yard FG was ridiculous before the half , why give Brady that much field position ?
Yea now that was beyond dumbI thought trying the 60 yard FG was ridiculous before the half , why give Brady that much field position ?
They played it right.
They did everything right. You can’t account for a ref not calling a clear push off.
did TB sign Brady in the commercial break?No you go for the lead, unfortunately the greatest human being in life was the QB on the other side with time left
They didn’t play for a FG just ended up having to take a FG. At that point in the game at that field position the only way you’re going for it is if you’re a 11 year old playing MaddenThat's exactly what happened. They kicked a FG then lost...
Right. Posters saying the Z cost the game are wrong. It’s pretty obvious Tampa could’ve scored a TD instead of kicking the FG if they had 2.Brady still had time to get a TD, assuming your 4th and 6 call actually works. He was throwing the ball away to kill clock in the end.
Great point. Wasn't that a sideline pass to Zeke? And he went OOB?
disgusted the league didn't call it if they give a damn about consistency. Week 1 SNF last year, Michael Gallup... just ugh.That really was a clear OPI..
OP is incorrect.
You have to kick there.
The problem is the playcalling on the series after Ceedee's big catch. And of course the holding penalty, but that was a bad playcall anyway. Needed to focus on getting shorter completions inbounds and chewing clock and a few yards a play.
Are you suggesting that not going for it on 4th and 6th, down 2, in field goal range, under 2 minutes was the wrong decision?did TB sign Brady in the commercial break?
well the penalty made that impossible. But from the very first play, they should have been looking for short routes towards the middle of the field. don't stop the clock, but gain a good 4-7 yards per play consistently. That was what was needed to bleed clock and win.Especially if you're just playing for the kick anyway, as they certainly seemed to be on 3rd down.
They werent playing for a FG... but the holding penalties FORCED you to play for the FG.If you're playing for a FG there you've already lost.
They werent playing for a FG... but the holding penalties FORCED you to play for the FG.
really?? and what happened? Did we take a knee or something?We had a play or two *after* the penalty, eh?
this comment is red herringIf you're playing for a FG there you've already lost.
Sorry. We said it at the time (I say "we" because so many of us said it). 4th and 6th, 1:42 left, you HAVE to try for the first down instead of kicking a FG. Some of you will counter with, "well, that's what the defense is paid to do, make a stop late in the game, with a lead." Sure. That works against Tom Brady as much as it did against Aaron Rodgers a few years back in the playoffs.
A first down there should have put the Cowboys in better FG range while bleeding the clock. Sometimes you've gotta make that unconventional call, especially when going up against the GOAT. Had they not made the first down? Not mad...how could we be? We knew Brady would bring them back anyway.
Every coach in the NFL kicks that FG.
If you're playing for a FG there you've already lost.