5 Mind Blowing Stats!

[Diehardblues]

Roy... A poster literally asked you what you cared about more "Dak and his numbers or the Cowboys winning games" and you would not answer his question.

I don't think you are the one to be telling people who is a fan or not lol

P.S. I posted you stats to prove that Zeke is the engine of the team. You won't accept them, because that's what you do, but it doesn't change anything.

Do you think we will win more games without Dak?

I’d like to hear what your plan is to win more games given our dysfunctional organization and situation. Who on this roster is taking us further than Dak at QB?

 

[Dak_Attack_09]

You forgot a few important stats:

Playoff wins - 1
NFC championship appearances - 0
Super Bowl appearances - 0

Do you remember what happened before Wentz, Goff, and Mahommes all got paid? Thats right, they actually accomplished something more important than personal stat padding.

You mean the one and only SB Mahomes won because Little Jimmy G couldn’t throw a deep ball.

 

[USArmyVet]

Throwing out facts is like throwing poison darts at them. They cant handle it.

Only thing members can't handle is your Dak loving stupidity.

 

[nightrain]

Just win, Baby. Terry Bradshaw-like stats are cool with me if the Championships come with it.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

You're easily impressed then.

Look who's talking....

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Do you think we will win more games without Dak?

I’d like to hear what your plan is to win more games given our dysfunctional organization and situation. Who on this roster is taking us further than Dak at QB?

Before I answer this I would like to know where I said that we would win more games without Dak.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Only thing members can't handle is your Dak loving stupidity.

Roy REFUSED to answer this question a poster asked him a few pages back... "So what is more important to you, Dak keeping up with his stat padding or the team actually winning something meaningful?"

Remember who you're dealing with when speaking to him. He's not a Cowboys fan. He's a Dak fan. Never forget,

 

[Diehardblues]

Before I answer this I would like to know where I said that we would win more games without Dak.

I’m just curious . I see all of the criticism of Dak but see very little criticism on other aspects of our roster , coaching and front office.

Where do you think this team is without Dak?

 

[Diehardblues]

Roy REFUSED to answer this question a poster asked him a few pages back... "So what is more important to you, Dak keeping up with his stat padding or the team actually winning something meaningful?"

Remember who you're dealing with when speaking to him. He's not a Cowboys fan. He's a Dak fan. Never forget,

He’s been on these forums since before Dak.

If we want to find the Mountaineer all we need to do is look for a Dak thread. Lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

He’s been on these forums since before Dak.

I know, and as I have stated before, he was probably a Cowboys fans at one time, but something has clearly switched.

When he wouldn't even answer that question another poster asked him that basically confirmed to me that his loyalties lie more with Dak than the team.

 

[Diehardblues]

Only thing members can't handle is your Dak loving stupidity.

Only non or former Cowboys fans wouldn’t support our QB despite whatever flaws he has.

 

[Diehardblues]

I know, and as I have stated before, he was probably a Cowboys fans at one time, but something has clearly switched.

When he wouldn't even answer that question another poster asked him that basically confirmed to me that his loyalties lie more with Dak than the team.

He doesn’t answer because it’s continuing to feed the trolling.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I’m just curious . I see all of the criticism of Dak but see very little criticism on other aspects of our roster , coaching and front office.

Where do you think this team is without Dak?

Well if Dak left this off season and we didn't replace him and went with what we have then we would of course be significantly worse.

The coaching and FO is terrible. I have no faith in them.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

He doesn’t answer because it’s continuing to feed the trolling.

What would be your answer to the question Roy refused to answer?

 

[DogFace]

Do you think we will win more games without Dak?

I’d like to hear what your plan is to win more games given our dysfunctional organization and situation. Who on this roster is taking us further than Dak at QB?

I’d add. Who in league.

What player is there a reasonable chance we can get who will make us a better team?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I’d add. Who in league.

What player is there a reasonable chance we can get who will make us a better team?

Here's my thing, just because Dak is our best option does not mean he is immune to criticism. I have him as the 11th best QB in the world and i'm labeled a "hater".

Yes, he is our best option out of whats available, but that doesn't mean you are required to suspend reality and convince yourself he is better than he has shown so far.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I’d add. Who in league.

What player is there a reasonable chance we can get who will make us a better team?

I just answered you. Good timing lol

 

[DogFace]

Here's my thing, just because Dak is our best option does not mean he is immune to criticism. I have him as the 11th best QB in the world and i'm labeled a "hater".

Yes, he is our best option out of whats available, but that doesn't mean you are required to suspend reality and convince yourself he is better than he has shown so far.

Well, that’s the debate. And it’s healthy and reasonable.

Maybe you’re being unfairly lumped in with many who suspend facts in their debate.

His record as a starter compared to his peers over the same period says he is better than your 11 ranking.
Many said that record was because of the team and that his low numbers (yards, rating, etc) proves that.

So the last couple of years he’s put up some pretty good numbers and some discount that too.

Sorry if you’re being labeled a hater, but in many threads I see you taking the same position so I’d guess the label is likely to stick. I think it’s fair to conclude you’re ok with that.

 

[Vtwin]

He doesn’t answer because it’s continuing to feed the trolling.

Roy is one of the biggest trolls on this forum. This thread is a troll thread, presented in trollish fashion, complete with hyperbolic references, and exclamation points.

If you listen carefully as you first read the thread title, you can hear the flutter of their little wings as the moths of all colors come fluttering to the flame.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Well, that’s the debate. And it’s healthy and reasonable.

Maybe you’re being unfairly lumped in with many who suspend facts in their debate.

His record as a starter compared to his peers over the same period says he is better than your 11 ranking.
Many said that record was because of the team and that his low numbers (yards, rating, etc) proves that.

So the last couple of years he’s put up some pretty good numbers and some discount that too.

Sorry if you’re being labeled a hater, but in many threads I see you taking the same position so I’d guess the label is likely to stick. I think it’s fair to conclude you’re ok with that.

I may come off that way, but I always try and back my claims up with numbers to prove it.

A lot of times when I do that the numbers get completely ignored and I can't help that, but I'm a results driven person that like to know where the numbers came from. You can look at a box score and see pretty stats, but how'd they happen? A QB could throw for 400 yards and 4 TDs, but what if he threw 3 weak screen passes that all wen't 90 yards to the house? The box score doesn't show that.

That's why I bring up Dak's big numbers from last year a lot. You have to put them in context. A huge chuck of them came in the 4th quarters after the games were already out of hand.

I want Dak to be good, but I can't pretend he is until he does it when everything isn't going his way. His numbers against teams .500 and above just scare me, because they are not good at all.