daschoo;2844999 said:
the basic argument seems to be that there are 31 guys who choke every year. or at least if romo is a choke artist until he wins a lombardi then surely the same argument applied to warner, rivers, the mannings, brees etc last year as they didn't win it all. romo's record in december and the playoffs is poor through a combination of factors directly in his control ie interceptions, fumbles, THAT field goal drop and factors outwith his control ie poor defensive play, dropped catches, poor o-line play. or in other words when the team play well and win in september its not all down to romo though he plays a big part in it the same as when the team plays poorly and loses in december though romo may take some blame it is not entirely down to him.
Unfortunately, thats the nature of the beast.
What gets me about the "Romo apologists" is their willingness
to cling to the idea that fans are questioning Romo's ABILITY!
Its like they're arguing apples & oranges- since no credible fan
is arguing whether Romo is CAPABLE of winning a ring.
That' d be like arguing that Dan Marino wasn't a great QB, since he
didn't get a ring. In other words- totally beside the point.
Worse yet, they'd rather start putting down other winning QB's,
& discrediting their accomplishment- almost as a way of downplaying
a SB's importance.
Thats a typical LOSER'S mentality: "He hasn't won one, but so what?
He's still better than all those other guys"!
OK- & thats relevant because............
Romo, not unlike Marino, has good/great stats at this stage in
his career. Will he get his ring?
Maybe....maybe not.
Either way, he will continue to be judged by fans & the media based
on winning a SB.
THATS the reality- the ultimate clincher is "did he win a SB"?
I'm banking on him winning one eventually- lets hope it happens.