For the first time in a long time, I can see our future and I like it. Hopefully I can finally change my signature this year.I have been posting a opinion of mine for about 3 years now which is that there is no one currently associated with the team with the exception of Stephen Jones that will still be associated with the team the next time the Cowboys win a super bowl. I now no longer hold that opinion and it is 100% due to Dak Prescott. In fact, I now think a super bowl is possible as early as this year. It's not Dak's arm or his talent. It's everything about him that screams winner. I just have full confidence that he will find a way to get it done and will not have a let down in big games like we are used to in the Romo era. It may not happen this year but at some point very soon, I expect him to take this team to a championship.
Agreed 100%. This is a different Cowboy club and on the verge of doing great things. Bank on it. The F.O just needs to stiffen that Defense a bit and its a SB guaranteed. The parts and more important the will and real ability is there.I have been posting a opinion of mine for about 3 years now which is that there is no one currently associated with the team with the exception of Stephen Jones that will still be associated with the team the next time the Cowboys win a super bowl. I now no longer hold that opinion and it is 100% due to Dak Prescott. In fact, I now think a super bowl is possible as early as this year. It's not Dak's arm or his talent. It's everything about him that screams winner. I just have full confidence that he will find a way to get it done and will not have a let down in big games like we are used to in the Romo era. It may not happen this year but at some point very soon, I expect him to take this team to a championship.
Remember at one time Romo was the shiny new toy. It happens.
I've posted my feelings in another thread, but now with the media and our own fans calling for trading Romo? Just unbelievable, how knee-jerk, and honestly how painstakingly dumb people can be.
Like I've said before, I'm not claiming that Dak is not the future, I'm not claiming that what Dak has with this team isn't special, but are we watching different games? Dak is excelling because we have built a TEAM around him that is making it incredibly easy for him to do what he is doing. Finally the team AROUND the qb is special and if you insert any random/decent QB on this team with this o-line, Elliot, Beasly, Witten and co. along with a defense that's going to hold GB to 16 points at home, a lot of average to above average QB's would see the success Dak is seeing.
Dak's success is not unlike RG3's or Nick Foles, who came in to the league and lit it on fire. They had their organizations thinking of 5+ years of SB contention. I'm not saying that this is going to happen to Dak, but what happened to those hot shot rookies? DC's figured out their tendencies, game planned accordingly and these super-stars became very ordinary, very fast. Did Bill Belicheck throw out Brady for Matt Cassel because Cassel was playing good ball when Brady was out? No, he traded him for value and watched his career go up in flames in a system outside of NE. I'm not implying that Romo is Brady or that Dak is Cassel (Dak actually has a future here), but you don't throw out your proven QB when a new QB has just proven that you have a good system outside of the QB.
We can not afford to not see what Romo has left, we owe him that and the organization owes itself that. Romo has 1 or 2 years left? What is going to happen when those 10 yard cushions to hit Beasly over the middle disappear come playoff time and we go 1 and out? Are we going to just forever wonder what if? What if it was our veteran behind center that has seen 10 seasons of different defenses, with tape on him, who have schemed for him, and he's still played at an elite level?
After everything Romo has given for the team, you don't just throw him away for the new toy. It's honestly a no win situation. Either way the organization decides to go this season, their is controversy (where their shouldn't be). Keep Dak, well Romo could have won it all. Put in Romo, what a dumb move Dak could have won it all. This is going to be an emotional rollercoaster and one hell of a distraction, as it always seems to be with Dallas.
This post is horrible on several fronts imo. I understand the message. It's been stated ad nauseam on this board but here it could have been stated better. I start to wonder are you a fan of THE DALLAS COWBOYS or Tony Romo? Is your solution to just immediately insert Tony Romo?
1. Your thread is about the disrespect of Tony Romo and then you IMMEDIATELY do everything in your power to blatantly disrespect and undermine Dak Prescott. Great Job!! 2. So if any Bozo can create the energy and execute the offense the way Dak has why hasn't this happened before? Why has our record been so ****ty without Romo with essentially the same team? We've even had several key injuries this year? I'll wait? Are you confident in starting Sanchez and having the train keep moving without losing a step? Right!!?? I can understand you advocating for Romo although I disagree with that line of thinking. You just have a backhanded ****ty way of doing it that only adds to the "disrespect" that you're arguing against.
What are you 12?
I too am dumbfounded by the lack of respect for Romo. People have just seem to have forgotten what he has done for this organization. I am all in on Dak, but Dak will be here we owe it to the fans, Organization and Romo to let him play out the string. If we do not have the team to win with Romo as the starter, then why do people think we have the team to win with Dak as the starter? I cannot wait to see what Dak will do for us, but let Romo finish first
Overreaction city bro. We're not trading Romo. We just want him to keep smiling on the sidelines.I've posted my feelings in another thread, but now with the media and our own fans calling for trading Romo? Just unbelievable, how knee-jerk, and honestly how painstakingly dumb people can be.
Like I've said before, I'm not claiming that Dak is not the future, I'm not claiming that what Dak has with this team isn't special, but are we watching different games? Dak is excelling because we have built a TEAM around him that is making it incredibly easy for him to do what he is doing. Finally the team AROUND the qb is special and if you insert any random/decent QB on this team with this o-line, Elliot, Beasly, Witten and co. along with a defense that's going to hold GB to 16 points at home, a lot of average to above average QB's would see the success Dak is seeing.
Dak's success is not unlike RG3's or Nick Foles, who came in to the league and lit it on fire. They had their organizations thinking of 5+ years of SB contention. I'm not saying that this is going to happen to Dak, but what happened to those hot shot rookies? DC's figured out their tendencies, game planned accordingly and these super-stars became very ordinary, very fast. Did Bill Belicheck throw out Brady for Matt Cassel because Cassel was playing good ball when Brady was out? No, he traded him for value and watched his career go up in flames in a system outside of NE. I'm not implying that Romo is Brady or that Dak is Cassel (Dak actually has a future here), but you don't throw out your proven QB when a new QB has just proven that you have a good system outside of the QB.
We can not afford to not see what Romo has left, we owe him that and the organization owes itself that. Romo has 1 or 2 years left? What is going to happen when those 10 yard cushions to hit Beasly over the middle disappear come playoff time and we go 1 and out? Are we going to just forever wonder what if? What if it was our veteran behind center that has seen 10 seasons of different defenses, with tape on him, who have schemed for him, and he's still played at an elite level?
After everything Romo has given for the team, you don't just throw him away for the new toy. It's honestly a no win situation. Either way the organization decides to go this season, their is controversy (where their shouldn't be). Keep Dak, well Romo could have won it all. Put in Romo, what a dumb move Dak could have won it all. This is going to be an emotional rollercoaster and one hell of a distraction, as it always seems to be with Dallas.
Problem is Romo is chronically injured? We might be 0-6 right now without Dak and we're BALLIN' right now. Why does Romo "deserve" to "finish?" What's on his resume that warrants immortality?
I do think this is a little disingenuous, how many Romo fumbles and intercepts have we lived with.He dinked and dunked more in that game than just about any other... when he wasn't fumbling or throwing it to the other team. Get over it.