andrew luck vs romo

[burmafrd]

Again, not gonna go there. Youre wrong, but its cool Ill let you feel like you win. This argument is so ridiculous that its not worth my time. No real NFL fan that isnt blinded by their homerism would put Romo anywhere near the same level at Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or Manning. So the fact that you do completely discredits anything you have to say about the matter.

And I hope that was another typical response that you were expecting.

So just for laughs can we put up our top 10 NFL QB's? List 1-10 the guys you would want on your team next year that would give you the best chance at a super bowl. I'll go 1st....

1. Rodgers
2. Brady
3. Brees
4. Eli
5. Big Ben
6. Romo
7. Rivers
8. Stafford
9. Ryan
10. Schaub

you are the gomer that said you would take Luck or III over Romo right now.
For all their potential, neither one has played in the probowl. Romo has. So right there what little credibility you had disapeared

 

[tm1119]

you are the gomer that said you would take Luck or III over Romo right now.
For all their potential, neither one has played in the probowl. Romo has. So right there what little credibility you had disapeared

I've seen what Romo can do. He's good, but he's not a guy who can put a team on his back to a superbowl. If I have a chance to get a young qb with star potential I would take it. Sure its a gamble, but QB's like Luck and RG3 don't come along that often.

 

[burmafrd]

I've seen what Romo can do. He's good, but he's not a guy who can put a team on his back to a superbowl. If I have a chance to get a young qb with star potential I would take it. Sure its a gamble, but QB's like Luck and RG3 don't come along that often.

you are hopeless.

 

[Risen Star]

Saying he would do it right now is a stretch but both of those guys have incredible potential.

Especially Griffin.

Luck has more potential than Griffin.

That's why he'll be the slam dunk, take it to the bank, 1st overall pick. His skill set is superior.

 

[Tricericon]

Again, not gonna go there. Youre wrong, but its cool Ill let you feel like you win. This argument is so ridiculous that its not worth my time. No real NFL fan that isnt blinded by their homerism would put Romo anywhere near the same level at Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or Manning. So the fact that you do completely discredits anything you have to say about the matter.

And I hope that was another typical response that you were expecting.

So just for laughs can we put up our top 10 NFL QB's? List 1-10 the guys you would want on your team next year that would give you the best chance at a super bowl. I'll go 1st....

1. Rodgers
2. Brady
3. Brees
4. Eli
5. Big Ben
6. Romo
7. Rivers
8. Stafford
9. Ryan
10. Schaub

...and then you don't have Manning in your top 10? :laugh2:

 

[cds99]

In a minute I would for luck, not for rg3 though

 

[TellerMorrow34]

Again, not gonna go there. Youre wrong, but its cool Ill let you feel like you win. This argument is so ridiculous that its not worth my time. No real NFL fan that isnt blinded by their homerism would put Romo anywhere near the same level at Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or Manning. So the fact that you do completely discredits anything you have to say about the matter.

And I hope that was another typical response that you were expecting.

So just for laughs can we put up our top 10 NFL QB's? List 1-10 the guys you would want on your team next year that would give you the best chance at a super bowl. I'll go 1st....

1. Rodgers
2. Brady
3. Brees
4. Eli
5. Big Ben
6. Romo
7. Rivers
8. Stafford
9. Ryan
10. Schaub

Sure I will. No problem.

First I'll say this. You assume to much. I never said he was those guys, or is those guys, or anything. I simply pointed out that what you said to back up your 'opinion' of him was wrong and I more than proved what you said was wrong.

As usual with people who don't think, at all, before they post something like "4000 yards and 35 seasons would be a great year for Romo", implying he's never thrown for 4000 yards or that those other guys routinely throw for 35 or more TDs (Both of which were proven, very easily, to be dead wrong), they then turn to the tried and true thing of calling someone a homer.

I don't need you to let me do anything. You've proven, multiple times now, that you didn't know what you were talking about, spouted off complete crap that was false, and when I posted stuff proving you wrong and challenged you on it you went to the tag lining and back pedaling of how you weren't going to so this or that.

Why? It's quite simple really. You had nothing to stand on. Your only defense of your opinion on said topic was the comment about the stats which was quickly, and easily, proven to be dead wrong so you've immediately turtled. Which is fine because it's completely expected.


Now for your question.


1. Aaron Rodgers
2. Tom Brady
3. Drew Brees
4. Peyton Manning (Under the assumption at this point that he's 100% healthy)
5. Eli Manning
6. Tony Romo
7. Big Ben
8. Matt Ryan
9. Phillip Rivers
10. Matt Shaub

 

[TellerMorrow34]

Huh, look at that, Romo ranked in the same place...interesting. THe only difference is I was able to back up my claim, where you couldn't, and still had him exactly where you believe he should be ranked as well.

But hey I guess it's better to back pedal and throw out 'homer' tag lines while assuming you know what someone thinks instead of simply admitting you opened your mouth with a comment that was wrong and that you had nothing else to back said opinion up with other than "I'm not getting into this".

Thanks for playing.

 

[DFWJC]

Again, not gonna go there. Youre wrong, but its cool Ill let you feel like you win. This argument is so ridiculous that its not worth my time. No real NFL fan that isnt blinded by their homerism would put Romo anywhere near the same level at Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or Manning. So the fact that you do completely discredits anything you have to say about the matter.

And I hope that was another typical response that you were expecting.

So just for laughs can we put up our top 10 NFL QB's? List 1-10 the guys you would want on your team next year that would give you the best chance at a super bowl. I'll go 1st....

1. Rodgers
2. Brady
3. Brees
4. Eli
5. Big Ben
6. Romo
7. Rivers
8. Stafford
9. Ryan
10. Schaub

hey tm
It looks like you rank Romo as fairly elite--certainly he would be near the bottom of the list of players that need replacing.

So why would you sell the farm to get rid of him for what very easily may not be an upgrade and could even be a big downgrade?

 

[rantanamo]

The truth is neither of you know the right answer. It actually is a tough call. Pretty good qb vs starting over with a potentially great qb. It is both possible that Romo has gone as far as he can while also possible that he takes the Boys even further. Its also possible the team is a steady, heady hand away from doing what it possibly can. You just don't know.

 

[silverbear]

would u give romo and a 1st and 2nd round pick for andrew luck??

Not only no, but hell no...

Here's betting that a lot of people who answer this question in the affirmative are the same ones who sneered at the Roy Williams trade, saying "you don't give up multiple high picks for any player"...

 

[silverbear]

Hate to brake it to you but Romo is pretty far from great. Hes good but great is a strong word that doesnt apply to many, and Romo just isnt in that class.

Id take both Luck and RG3 over Romo right now no doubt.

OK, now I know what your opinion's worth... thanks, I won't waste my time taking you seriously...

 

[silverbear]

Yup blinded by our 1 playoff win....Im not a Romo hater and Im fine with the fact that he isnt going anywhere.

And of course, quarterbacks and quarterbacks alone determine who wins playoff games...

Tony's "only" the second rated passer ALL TIME, at 96.9... he's "only" led the team to 14 game-winning drvies in the 4th quarter, and another 13 in which he's led them to retake the lead, only to have the team subsequently lose the game... all this in just 77 career starts...

He's "only" completed nearly 65 per cent of his passes for his career (64.5, to be exact), and he's "only" thrown a little over 2 TD passes for every int he's thrown (149 to 72)... he's "only" averaging 8.0 yards per attempt for his career, ranking 5th in NFL history in that stat...

Yup, I think the word "great" is appropriate when talking about Tony Romo, and I question the football knowledge of anybody who'd disagree with that...

 

[silverbear]

There is no argument. Do I really need to bring up Romo's stats VS the top 4 QB's in the league? Do I have to bring up the lack winning in his career? I thought it was all very obvious and unnecessary.

No, you don't need to bring up anything else... we all know you now for what you are... the word "clueless" comes to mind...

But I will say one thing, it's completely RIDICULOUS to base an argument on "Romo's stats vs. the top 4 QBs in the league"... Romo's not playing against those quarterbacks, he's playing against their team's defense... and those top 4 QBs aren't playing against Romo, they're playing against our defense...

Ahhh, why am I wasting my time, I doubt you're capable of being educated...

 

[silverbear]

Ok I'm done with this. Not going to continue this agruement, its clearly pointless.

You're wise to run from your asinine argument...

Im not going to argue with anyone who really thinks Romo is actuallly on the level of Brees, Brady, Manning, or Rodgers.

Career stats say he is... but hell, what's statistical fact, compared to your opinion??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

 

[silverbear]

Yup he "pwned" me. Cool.

I thought you were done with this...

I just pray none of u ever try to make this argument in public outside of the state of Texas.

I'll make my argument with any fool who tries to deny Romo's ability... your problem is you've mistakem team success (or failure) for individual success...

I don't think you'll be able to deal with the humiliation that follows.

Only one being humiliated here is you, hoss... you have crapped embarrassment all over yourself...

 

[TheSport78]

Yes, I would give up a 1st and 2nd rounder for Luck. I love Romo but I wouldn't even think twice about it. Luck's the best QB prospect to come out in years, and Romo has what, 3, 4 or 5 years left?

 

[silverbear]

Again, not gonna go there. Youre wrong

Says the clueless fan who has just shredded his credibility...

 

[silverbear]

I've seen what Romo can do. He's good, but he's not a guy who can put a team on his back to a superbowl. If I have a chance to get a young qb with star potential I would take it. Sure its a gamble, but QB's like Luck and RG3 don't come along that often.

And you think that Luck or Griffin could take this team to a Super Bowl??

Mercy, it's getting hard to get mad at you, because you're just so COMICAL...

Be advised that no knowledgeable fan frequenting this forum will ever take you seriously again...

 

[silverbear]

Huh, look at that, Romo ranked in the same place...interesting. THe only difference is I was able to back up my claim, where you couldn't, and still had him exactly where you believe he should be ranked as well.

Braveheart, he's afflicted with the peculiar form of arrogance that tells him his position is beyond debate, simply because it's his... it doesn't matter what the facts say, he's right, and that's that...

This whole thread has been kind of like watching a train wreck; it's fascinating, in a grotesque way...

Another symptom of this is grandly announcing that you're done with the argument, then cranking out response after response after that announcment. he simply has to get the last word in...