SloMo_Joe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,078
- Reaction score
- 1,176
Sounds like the Dak excuses too.He’s only responsible for wins, losses are everyone else’s fault.
Sounds like the Dak excuses too.He’s only responsible for wins, losses are everyone else’s fault.
Brought them back? Like that should be commended after he literally gave them 14 points and turned the ball over 3 other times.You forgot to mention he still brought his team back for the W on his final drive.
Wow, look at the troll cherry picking games. I bet if you tried you could find bad games from any QB. This is an amazing discovery for QB analysis.Brought them back? Like that should be commended after he literally gave them 14 points and turned the ball over 3 other times.
Alright, let’s fast forward to the following year, 2008. Romo played a win and in game against the Eagles. He threw 39 times for an astonishing 21 completions, barely over a 50% completion rate. He also turned the ball over 3 times and threw ZERO TD passes.
Another fine performance that Romosexuals like to ignore or have more excuses for.
This video shows how Romo would call a new play at the LOS to make JG bad scheme work. Against 2014 playoff game against Detroit, two plays were called based on coverage they saw all game. When Romo saw that the coverage was looked different he called a brand new play "Tennessee" at the line.
This shows you Romo made the coaches look much better than they were. People who thinks we can just bring in a new QB and all will be fine are kidding themselves. Unless JG and his scheme is gone, we need a QB that is as good or better than Romo. Good luck with that. Nothing will really change much until JG is gone.
More than the 16-0 Patriots did against the same defense despite the receivers leaving at least 11 points on the field through wide open drops and quitting on routes.And how many points did our offense score?
There is only one lolI dont think anyone on here is campaigning for JGs and his scheme to stay. Most of us want a full house cleaning (New QB and coaching staff).
So Romo kicked the game winner. Gotcha.
what a ******* thing to say manThese threads are really making me want something bad to happen to romo. Like jesus christ he was an above average qb that can't hold field goal snaps, was unlucky as hell, and won 2 playoff games in a decade. He wasn't that good give it a rest. He won't even make the HOF. Stop worrying about a guy that could barely make it to work on a consistent basis.
All it wouldve taken was the next to last play of the game being different.....he held up his end while throwing what should've been the game winner to Crayton.18 of 36, 201 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception
https://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2008...hedule_rr&akmobile=ios-tablet&akcarrier=other
17
I fully understand the stupidity and bias in your post. No need for you to repeat the same bull**** again.What part of my quote did you not understand? let me know and i will walk you thru it slowly
This video shows how Romo would call a new play at the LOS to make JG bad scheme work. Against 2014 playoff game against Detroit, two plays were called based on coverage they saw all game. When Romo saw that the coverage was looked different he called a brand new play "Tennessee" at the line.
This shows you Romo made the coaches look much better than they were. People who thinks we can just bring in a new QB and all will be fine are kidding themselves. Unless JG and his scheme is gone, we need a QB that is as good or better than Romo. Good luck with that. Nothing will really change much until JG is gone.
He also won that gameOk, let’s talk about his 2007 MNF game against Buffalo. He tied a record, he was only the second QB ever to throw 5 INT’s on MNF, 2 of which were returned for fumbles. He even lost a fumble to add the icing on the cake. Very impressive!
I can only imagine the reaction if Dak did that in his second year.
These threads are really making me want something bad to happen to romo. Like jesus christ he was an above average qb that can't hold field goal snaps, was unlucky as hell, and won 2 playoff games in a decade. He wasn't that good give it a rest. He won't even make the HOF. Stop worrying about a guy that could barely make it to work on a consistent basis.
Hey, everyone has an opinion. Yours is that Romo isn't a good QB, mine is that your a terrible evaluator of talent.I don't think he was that good so I didn't expect that from him. The romosexuals portray him as a god that was the best qb in the league. If he was that good he could have gotten us there more than he did is all im saying.
I do not argue Crayton’s failure but that is another reason why I stress looking at what happens all four quarters of a game. There is always lots of emphasis on the Crayton miscue and practically none pointed out about other team mistakes that game. Not saying you are ignoring the fact but an ENTIRE unit of the team did not do its job to secure the win at a crucial moment of the game. And what do both Romo’s supporters and critics usually say about that glaringly large error?All it wouldve taken was the next to last play of the game being different.....he held up his end while throwing what should've been the game winner to Crayton.
The play after that was the last resort, no time or timeouts pick in the endzone. Very deceiving pick, stats wise. He only has one other pick in his playoff career vs 8 TDs.
Fwiw, even then, the 17 points Dallas scored was more the Pats could in the SB
The Giants D got rolling
I fully understand the stupidity and bias in your post. No need for you to repeat the same bull**** again.