Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
Yes give them a 4th .
And inherit that salary? Okay then.
Yes give them a 4th .
the guy we should be trading for is Vaccarro,we can get him for a 5th rd pick and we still have control for 3 more years.
And inherit that salary? Okay then.
They restructured it with in the last couple of days.
This guy is 258 pounds. Can he even play DE in a 43?
That probably just provides temporary relief for them by pushing out the money.
I have not been paying a lot of attention to that, but if they restructured it to where it was team friendly, why would they bother to shop him? It is not like they have a replacement on the roster right now.
Why did they trade jimmy graham ? Or Kenny stills for a 5th ? I don't know either . But this guy is what we need desperately and he isn't paid a huge salary . Had 10 sacks and 2 safeties last season.
Graham was a salary dump. Stills was more because supposedly Brees had a problem with him and he was marketable.
They were talking about dumping him even before he agreed to the restructure. He also has a domestic violence thing going on.
That should tell you what you need to know.
theyve been making some questionable moves they also let Ben Grubbs go for a 5th or 6th. I just think if you have an opportunity to get a guy who produces double digit sacks (at a bargain price) you get him.
Trading a 30 year old guard earning a lot of money for a fifth round pick?
I wish Jerry Jones was able to do that a few years ago.
That probably just provides temporary relief for them by pushing out the money.
I have not been paying a lot of attention to that, but if they restructured it to where it was team friendly, why would they bother to shop him? It is not like they have a replacement on the roster right now.
I'd give them Escobar & a 2016 undisclosed pick based on performance ranging from a 3rd to a 5th
If Greg Hardy is considered radioactive, and he's a free agent, why would anyone trade for a lesser player in Galette, who has an existing contract of decent money, and would require forfeiting draft picks? Makes no sense.
the guy we should be trading for is Vaccarro,we can get him for a 5th rd pick and we still have control for 3 more years.