nalam;5093068 said:Any boys fans in Minny , have any info on Sharrif Floyd , how is he doing in OTAs etc,..
FoR whatever worth, Frederick and Floyd are linked and so some of us are curious.
nalam;5093068 said:Any boys fans in Minny , have any info on Sharrif Floyd , how is he doing in OTAs etc,..
Fletch;5093172 said:They are not linked. Floyd is not a Cowboy. We needed O line first and foremost. Frederick will have the better career. Mark it down.
tommydo08;5093190 said:After some quick and dirty research, it seems to be that the reason why he fell is because of his short arms. I'm not sure if this is news to y'all though.
http://www.dailynorseman.com/2013/4/30/4287886/vikings-draft-2013-shariff-floyd
And it seems like his lack of sacks doesn't attribute to how disruptive he is because apparently, he is the one setting up a play for a sack or some other efficient play.
tm1119;5093184 said:And if we chose Floyd you would be saying the complete opposite.
We passed on Floyd for whatever crazy reason ran through Jerry's head at the time. Now its over and the guys we got for what could have been Floyd seem to be good young players. No need to dwell on it now....unless Floyd becomes a perennial pro bowl player and Frederick busts (even though I doubt it), then we have can all have the right to complain for at least 5 years.
Deep_Freeze;5093250 said:With our past of getting guys who can play later in the draft, don't know why we would even want Floyd there. With guys like Bowen, Canty, TRat, Hatch, and others found later in the draft, this team has shown it can find guys along the DL......one of the few things it has shown it can definitely draft well late recently.
So why spend a first rounder on it.....I just don't see it, leverage our teams' good attribute and draft other positions high in the draft. News of Sharrif.....give me news of Crawford instead.