liteskinstunna38
New Member
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
For a discount I would consider taking Joey back. He still has alot of speed in his tank and could possibly tutor Austin. What do you think?
Anyone want Joey Galloway back?
- Thread starter liteskinstunna38
- Start date
Chuck 54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,513
- Reaction score
- 12,525
For the right price I'd take him back...he was totally misused in Dallas. He was simply run deep as a decoy over and over and over again by a coach who wanted to have slow, methodical ball control.
He was a great receiver before Dallas and did some great things in TB after Dallas. I think he'd be great in the offense we run now...but I'm thinking we stay with the young guys we have now...I don't see Jerry putting much money into the position.
He was a great receiver before Dallas and did some great things in TB after Dallas. I think he'd be great in the offense we run now...but I'm thinking we stay with the young guys we have now...I don't see Jerry putting much money into the position.
Yeagermeister
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,629
- Reaction score
- 117
Nope.
BourbonBalz
Star4Ever
- Messages
- 12,207
- Reaction score
- 8,178
On the cheap? Yea. Why not for a season or two. Not as a starter, but to be used in 3 and 4 receiver sets.
khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,965
- Reaction score
- 37,488
Mansta54;2677700 said:
If anything, TO was stretching the field. How much more does one spread the field when the defense is putting safety help over the top? I find this all amusing. So we get Joey Galloway, who is not even close to TO, to run down the field straight into double-coverage this year? Why are defenses going to change their philosophy against this Cowboys offense, when Garrett couldn't get the ball to RW or Crayton?
Crayton was made the number 3 receiver, where he was matched up against LBs and Garrett still couldn't get him the ball to move the chains. I don't care how slow is Crayton, the guy can beat the majority of LBs in a race.
khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,965
- Reaction score
- 37,488
Mansta54;2677712 said:Why would we have to abandon the run just because we add more speed to our WR position?
The poster was saying that he thinks Galloway would be great in the offense we run now. The last thing we need is to run the same ghetto-offense we were running last year with Garrett as coach. The fact is, TO WAS stretching the field. Our offense didn't need stretching the field. We don't need a speedy receiver. We need to balance this offense, which could have easily been done with a HoF receiver that was already stretching the field.
MWILL
Fear the Afro
- Messages
- 952
- Reaction score
- 0
glorydaysrback;2677714 said:
The only thing I saw Austin busting out is a knee, ACL, etc....
Kidding aside, Austin shows us some spark. Then he let's us down with an injury. I know he can't help that, but that's why I can't trust him right now.
On top of that, Roy Williams hasn't showned he can stay healthy. We are screwed if both Roy and Austin goes down. We just let go the only WR that keeps himself in great shape year in and year out.
We need to add another WR FA and the Draft.
cowboyschmps3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,371
- Reaction score
- 1,880
yes i mean why not, yeah hes old but it wouldn't hurt if the price is right....
