AP to Dallas?

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,199
Reaction score
39,440
It makes no sense for the Vikings to trade Peterson when they just used their #1 on a QB. The Vikings will be playing outdoors in the cold for 2 seasons until their new stadium is ready and their young QB will need the security of Peterson in the backfield. The trade would make no sense for the Cowboys bringing in what's left of Peterson who's pushing 30. His 1266 rushing yards in 2013 was the lowest total of his career other than his 970 yard injury plagued 2011 season. His 4.5 average was the second lowest of his career. It would be foolish to give up a premium pick for a 29 year old RB who's in decline.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
46,580
Reaction score
46,004
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
lol

I don't think you understood his point.. not surprising though. Mouth breather, indeed. How's Eli doin this offseason, bro?

I understood perfectly his point. I used that to back my point. Can't you see that?

No idea what your mean by the Eli question.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
I understood perfectly his point. I used that to back my point. Can't you see that?

No idea what your mean by the Eli question.

lol

His point was a counter argument to your last post..and stood only to strengthen my statement that stats are absolutely telling of the story when viewed in the right mannar. Obviously if you choose to look at individual numbers rather than at the whole picture, you can come away with a skewed assessment as you did. But again, there's a reason more and more organizations in most major professional sports leagues are trending towards using analytics to build their franchises.
 

Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,697
The writer of this speculation sparks a pretty good point.

If you're the front office, do you really want to re-sign DeMarco Murray? The answer is probably no. Even if he has a great year. I'd be more interested in franchising him and trading him if possible.

The ability for us to afford Adrian Peterson next year as opposed to this year is much higher. The problem with the theory is that Peterson will also be a year older. That being said it would be a 3 year deal worth 43.25 million per year. And you could always try to lower that base as he deteriorates. The first year would be cheap, and you could always cut ties in year 2, especially since we would have a better shot at absorbing that money in 2016.

noway am I paying a 30+ year-old RB with massive carries for 43 million.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
lol

His point was a counter argument to your last post..and stood only to strengthen my statement that stats are absolutely telling of the story when viewed in the right mannar. Obviously if you choose to look at individual numbers rather than at the whole picture, you can come away with a skewed assessment as you did. But again, there's a reason more and more organizations in most major professional sports leagues are trending towards using analytics to build their franchises.

those that rely on analytics are going for a big fall. I agree they need to be used more but to rely on them for most of your ideas is a huge mistake. Humans have too many variables to use analytics on and expect to not make some HUGE mistakes. You need old fashioned Mark 1 football instincts to balance them out.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
those that rely on analytics are going for a big fall. I agree they need to be used more but to rely on them for most of your ideas is a huge mistake. Humans have too many variables to use analytics on and expect to not make some HUGE mistakes. You need old fashioned Mark 1 football instincts to balance them out.

I agree.. i think that falls in with the "looking at the full scope of things" idea, rather than just at individual numbers..but i understand what you are saying about the organizations that rely on it too much.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I agree.. i think that falls in with the "looking at the full scope of things" idea, rather than just at individual numbers..but i understand what you are saying about the organizations that rely on it too much.

In a way Dallas fell into that trap- Gil Brandt said the main reason they did not draft Mike Singletary was because he was half an inch too short for their minimum height requirements for LBs.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
In a way Dallas fell into that trap- Gil Brandt said the main reason they did not draft Mike Singletary was because he was half an inch too short for their minimum height requirements for LBs.

Yea, that is a shame.. especially with one of my favorite Cowboys ever being Dat Nguyen.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Yea, that is a shame.. especially with one of my favorite Cowboys ever being Dat Nguyen.

Yeah no telling how many others we might have passed on due to that narrow view we took late 70's and on. Probably one of the big reasons we fell off the cliff.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
46,580
Reaction score
46,004
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
lol

His point was a counter argument to your last post..and stood only to strengthen my statement that stats are absolutely telling of the story when viewed in the right mannar. Obviously if you choose to look at individual numbers rather than at the whole picture, you can come away with a skewed assessment as you did. But again, there's a reason more and more organizations in most major professional sports leagues are trending towards using analytics to build their franchises.

Whatever dude. Back track, back track, back track.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
nice post. Still don't want him.

I ain't payin' for no RB esp in a ZBS. We can draft them.

Right.

Notice how long it took for the first RB to be picked this year? It's become clear that they're easy and cheaper to find in later rounds, and the OL that blocks for them is much higher valued.

Granted, AP is special, but at what price and at what risk?

Just doesn't look like a sound business decision.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
This shouldn't even be a consideration. Maybe five years ago, but not now.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
I give this less than a 0% chance of happening.

They're not going to be trading for AP.
 

Cowboy_Ace

Active Member
Messages
151
Reaction score
25
I think what had happened with your phone is... You asked SIRI, "where is the closest pizza joint" and it came back with = Adrian Peterson rumored to Dallas

I don't have a siri, I'm not an Apple fan...it popped up on my blink feed, but that was an entertaining post :p
 
Top