ARTICLE: T.O.'s call got Barry back to 'Bad Boy' self

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,636
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Column by Carl Steward

OAKLAND — In what serves as yet another affirmation of the twisted world we live in, we apparently all have Terrell Owens to thank today for Barry Bonds finally getting off the dime.

After 40 plate appearances, 29 at-bats and 10 games of increasingly pensive waiting to pull alongside Babe Ruth, Bonds finally hit career home run No.714 on Saturday at McAfee Coliseum.

And whether it was a made-for-reality show anecdote or not, the San Francisco Giants slugger maintained it was none other than T.O., everyone's favorite controversial wide receiver, who provided the magic words that lifted him out of his funk following a Friday phone call.

"He (Owens) kind of kicked me in the butt, because he said if I ever wanted my No.1 Bad Boy ranking back, I've got to start hitting home runs," Bonds said. "So I was like, 'I want it back.' So he kind of helped me."

Bonds is a tough man to figure on this self-image thing. Does he really enjoy being sports' Public Enemy No.1, even now that he's tied for No.2 on the all-time home run list with the Sultan of Swat? He constantly gives mixed signals and did so once again, even in the wake of his milestone blast in a 4-2 Giants win over Oakland.

When he actually hit the second-inning shot off A's left-hander Brad Halsey, Bonds ran the bases with something akin to a scowl. He hugged and kissed his son, Nikolai, who met him at home plate. But when he was greeted at the dugout by teammates,took a couple of curtain calls and then sat for a long period by himself afterward, he looked more like a guy who gave up the historic home run rather than hitting it.

Yet after the game, Bonds was as happy and humble and lovable as Bonds ever gets.

"I'm just glad it happened in the Bay — East Bay, West Bay — as long as it just happened here in the Bay, it was just great," he said. "The fans even here in Oakland were phenomenal. They gave me a standing ovation, they all cheered. I think it was exciting for them because it was in the Bay Area regardless."

Well, they didn't all cheer. While there were some A's fans standing and applauding a rare moment in baseball history, a good number of them booed, too. In fact, the young man who caught the ball in the right-field bleachers, 19-year-old Pleasanton resident Tyler Snyder, said he wasn't a Barry Bonds fan whatsoever and didn't really care to meet him.

"Hell no, I hate the guy," Snyder said emphatically.

Apprised of Snyder's comments afterward, Bonds was nonplused.

"If he doesn't like me, give me the ball," he mused. "I don't have any idea why anyone would express hatred toward any other person that you don't know."

The real question, again, is whether Bonds desires to be appreciated or loved for what he has done in baseball. Again, he sounded conflicted about it, talking about the mental and physical strain
clear.gif
clear.gif
the daily attention has caused him, as if it were burden rather than a blessing.

"There's just a whole lot around," he said. "It was lot easier to come to the ballpark and just let everything go. But when you have a big stage all day every single day, it becomes exhausting. You get tired. There'll be somebody after me, and he'll feel the same way ... tired."

Bonds said he tried to fend off the pressure by not talking much to the media in recent weeks. But he maintained most of that pressure went away when he launched No.714, and he won't feel as much weight on himself for the next one, when he passes the legendary Ruth on the all-time list.

"It was the same thing with Willie (Mays)," he said. "Once you tie, everything after is just passing somebody. I think trying to get there is harder than what goes after it."

And Bonds is not even thinking about all-time leader Hank Aaron, still 41 home runs away. Not yet, anyway.

"I don't have to worry about that at all right now," he said. "It's far away, so I can just have fun."

Fun? Is Barry Bonds still really having fun after all the controversy and turmoil he's been through in recent years with the BALCO scandal and the general attitude of disdain at his quest to join the immortals of the game? He claims he is, even if it doesn't show on his face.

"This is a great accomplishment because of Babe Ruth and what he brought to the game of baseball," he said. "This and a World Series ring would be the ultimate for me. He changed the game of baseball, and we all have had our opportunity to add our two cents to it. It's just great to be in the same class."

Told that it's been 70 years since Ruth hit his 714th homer, Bonds was asked how he thinks he might be perceived 70 years from now. He said he didn't care, because he wouldn't be here to find out.

"I'm just glad it's over with," he said. "You guys can go watch Albert Pujols now."

It didn't sound like sports' No.1 Bad Boy talking. It just sounded like a guy who doesn't have a firm idea about his place in history. We can't help him on that count, either, because we don't really know the answer, either.

No question, something important occurred Saturday at the Coliseum. But in lieu of Terrell Owens being on hand to set us all straight, we'll have to leave it to time to judge just what.

Carl Steward can be reached at (510) 293-2451 or by e-mail at csteward@angnewspapers.com


LINK

-------------
WG Note: Couldn't decide which Zone to post it, so I figure why not start it here...
 

Cowchips

New Member
Messages
656
Reaction score
0
Barry Bonds deserves a title, but it's the modern day title.

In Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron's days, they only saw one pitcher per game. Today with all the specialist roles of short and long relief, they'd be lucky to have 500 home runs each.

People need to grow up and get over this.
 

Cowchips

New Member
Messages
656
Reaction score
0
SkinsandTerps said:
So who had the #1 Bad Boy tag before TO called ? Yep, TO.

# one active bad boy is Ron Artest. TO isnt even close to that level.

# one retired bad boy is OJ Simpson, with Pete Rose a close second.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
SkinsandTerps said:
So who had the #1 Bad Boy tag before TO called ? Yep, TO.


I hate TO and I wouldn't even classify him as a "Bad boy". I wouldn't consider Bonds a "Bad boy" either.


They're both ***holes and complete jerks (and you can add cheater to bonds resume), but they aren't "Bad boys".

Ricky Manning is more of a bad boy then TO (he actually assaults people).
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Cowchips said:
People need to grow up and get over this.

Totally...I mean, what real advatage do you gain by pumping yourself up to gargantuan proportions artificially, and illegally - until your head is the size of a small planet?

People can be so shallow and narrow-minded about stuff like that.:)
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
superpunk said:
Totally...I mean, what real advatage do you gain by pumping yourself up to gargantuan proportions artificially, and illegally - until your head is the size of a small planet?

People can be so shallow and narrow-minded about stuff like that.:)
Then why do they do it?

There was a former major league player who called in to the Jim Rome show two weeks ago and he said steroids had a dramatic effect on his ability. He said his power increased a great deal, he reacted quicker, he saw the ball better, etc.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Chief said:
Then why do they do it?

There was a former major league player who called in to the Jim Rome show two weeks ago and he said steroids had a dramatic effect on his ability. He said his power increased a great deal, he reacted quicker, he saw the ball better, etc.

I agree with that. If Steroids were no big deal then why take them. As far as I'm concerned there is no excuse for players coming in juiced up and if found cheating they should be banned from the league.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
Cowchips said:
# one active bad boy is Ron Artest. TO isnt even close to that level.

# one retired bad boy is OJ Simpson, with Pete Rose a close second.
Wait a minute; OJ Simpson is a whole other subject. He was one of the most respected people in America until he murdered his ex-wife. He was never considered a "Bad Boy" before that. He is not a "Bad Boy" he is a cold blooded murderer...a Criminal. (Note: insert your own "alleged" wherever you see fit since OJ was acquitted; I'm not going to bother.)

Owens, Rose, Artest, Bonds...these guys are all "Bad Boys"
 

Xy_Oldone

Member
Messages
282
Reaction score
2
Cowchips said:
Barry Bonds deserves a title, but it's the modern day title.

In Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron's days, they only saw one pitcher per game. Today with all the specialist roles of short and long relief, they'd be lucky to have 500 home runs each.

People need to grow up and get over this.
More games per year. Shorter outfields. Right. In todays game Ruth and Aaron would be awesome.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Chief said:
Sorry. It's Monday. I'm a little slow.

Heh, no problem. I can't stand Barry, and it doesn't even have anything to do with his dreadful personality. He's a cheater, plain and simple. Him, Gaylord Perry, Sosa, McGwire, all cheaters. Even if there's no concrete evidence that steroids helps any, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that more strength and beef=more distance. Fly balls become home runs...you can swing the bat faster, etc.

It's disgusting, and even more disgusting that it was just ignored because it was making the league so much money. I haven't watched SC in two weeks because I can't stand hearing about that cheater. IMO, every single time they cut to him, they should mention steroids - EVERY time.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Xy_Oldone said:
More games per year. Shorter outfields. Right. In todays game Ruth and Aaron would be awesome.

I agree and will add that Ruth set the record with 2,000 less at bats than Aaron had.
 

JPM

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,301
Reaction score
1,236
And if the Babe failed as a hitter, he could still pitch.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
I hate TO and I wouldn't even classify him as a "Bad boy". I wouldn't consider Bonds a "Bad boy" either.


They're both ***holes and complete jerks (and you can add cheater to bonds resume), but they aren't "Bad boys".

Ricky Manning is more of a bad boy then TO (he actually assaults people).
Assault isn't being a "bad boy" in my book, it is being a Criminal. Ok misdemeanor assault such as in a bar fight is different but beyond that it is criminal. I make a distinction between "bad boy" and "criminal" and the line is drawn somewhere between misdemeanor and violent felony. A "bad boy" a troublemaker and/or rule breaker but not a violent felon. Owens is a 'bad boy" because he is a troublemaker.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Love those that try and claim that Ruth would not be anywhere near as good today. He was an incredible athlete that loved to play. Can you imagine if he had modern training programs, etc. As regards pitching- they had relief pitchers back then- just did not use them that much. Also, for the first 4-5 years of his career he was a pitcher- and most of all the ball was DEAD. He would have added at least another 100+ HR's to his total if the ball had been anywhere near alive. He was leading the league even with the dead ball.
If he had 800+ Aaron would never have tried to hang around to break it; Bonds would not have tried either.
 

Mash

Active Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
0
I liked Barry Bonds......IMHO....i think he is one of the greatest ball players to ever play the game.....steroids or no steroids

That being said.....I dont think he deserves to be up there with the great home run hitters.

Steroids make u stronger, faster....heal quicker.....but to Barry's credit....u still have to hit the ball.....it doesn't make u see the ball better....just quicker reflexes......u still have to hit it.

Plus...i could be wrong....but he never did anything illegal....at the time...if we assume Barry did take steroids....it wasn't a ban substance in baseball.....at the time he could be also facing pitchers...or other players who were on the juice that we have no idea about.

The media can make u a goat or a hero......i mean look at Ray Lewis......The NFL praised him and swept his little murder case under the rug.....you dont pay the victims family a undisclosed amount of cash if u are innocent.
 

jay cee

Active Member
Messages
2,906
Reaction score
3
superpunk said:
Heh, no problem. I can't stand Barry, and it doesn't even have anything to do with his dreadful personality. He's a cheater, plain and simple. Him, Gaylord Perry, Sosa, McGwire, all cheaters. Even if there's no concrete evidence that steroids helps any, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that more strength and beef=more distance. Fly balls become home runs...you can swing the bat faster, etc.

It's disgusting, and even more disgusting that it was just ignored because it was making the league so much money. I haven't watched SC in two weeks because I can't stand hearing about that cheater. IMO, every single time they cut to him, they should mention steroids - EVERY time.
I'm glad you added Gaylord Perry. I'm amazed at the talking heads that have slammed guys like Bonds, Sosa and McGwire and then turn around and say that it is not the same for the pitchers that cheated by throwing altered balls.

IMO cheating is cheating. I heard Keith Olbermann actually defend the idea of pitchers cheating, because it is supposed to be a part of the very fabric of the game. So it is not nearly as offensive as steroid abuse.

Any illegal act that allows you to gain an unfair advantage over your opponent should be dealt with harshly, period.

Olberman even compared doctoring the ball to when the defensive player does not actually have his foot on the bag when recording an out.

I found that argument to be totally preposterous. It's up to the umpire to call a player safe, or out. If the umpires repeatedly miss that (and they do), its because they are failing to do their job, not because the defensive player is cheating.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
burmafrd said:
Love those that try and claim that Ruth would not be anywhere near as good today. He was an incredible athlete that loved to play. Can you imagine if he had modern training programs, etc. As regards pitching- they had relief pitchers back then- just did not use them that much. Also, for the first 4-5 years of his career he was a pitcher- and most of all the ball was DEAD. He would have added at least another 100+ HR's to his total if the ball had been anywhere near alive. He was leading the league even with the dead ball.
If he had 800+ Aaron would never have tried to hang around to break it; Bonds would not have tried either.
Actually what they used to do back in those days was have a group of pitchers that rotated. IF the starter began to get tired they would bring in another pitcher in his place but the next week the two guys might be in the opposite roles of starter and reliever. They didn't have relief pitchers per se; they just had pitchers who performed wherever and whenever needed. But they did get relief if they started to get tired.
 
Top