ARTICLE: Upshaws remarks increase tension surrounding union

Angus

Active Member
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
20
Upshaw's remarks increase tension surrounding union
Players union chief has threatening words for a critic
By Ken Murray
Sun reporter
Originally published June 6, 2007

The simmering feud between the NFL Players Association and retired players boiled over when Gene Upshaw, the union's executive director, made threatening comments about one of his most vocal critics.

Speaking about Hall of Fame guard Joe DeLamielleure in an interview with the Philadelphia Daily News last week, Upshaw said: "A guy like DeLamielleure says the things he said about me; you think I'm going to invite him to dinner? No. I'm going to break his ... damn neck."

Upshaw's outburst comes at a time when the NFL's image has been tarnished by repeated player arrests in the past year.

Commissioner Roger Goodell didn't speak directly about Upshaw's remarks during a visit to Charlotte, N.C., for a luncheon honoring Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson yesterday. But he clearly resented the latest firestorm in the league's relationship with its former players.

"Retired players are important to us," he told the Associated Press. "They helped us build the game. I don't think anybody I know has done more for retired players, or players in general, than Gene Upshaw.

"I think it's unfortunate this kind of thing is going on. I think that's the reason Gene and I have talked about forming this alliance where we can address these issues in a responsible fashion. I don't think it's helpful, but I understand it's an emotional issue."

DeLamielleure, who has criticized the union's pension and disability plans under Upshaw, said he takes the threat seriously, as does his wife, Gerri.

"A physical threat from a man in that position? I'm worried," Gerri DeLamielleure said. "When I can't get Joe on his cell phone, I'm real upset."

The DeLamielleures live in Charlotte, but when Gerri was unable to reach Joe for several hours when he made a trip to Buffalo recently, she feared for his safety.

"Of course Gene Upshaw was in the back of my mind," she said. "This was before any threat was ever made. You have to take something like that very seriously. It's very worrisome to me."

She isn't the only one. Bernie Parrish, a former union leader in the league who has sued the NFL's Players' Inc. over distribution of funds, said he considers Upshaw a "dangerous man."

"Running off at the mouth, threatening to break Joe D's neck, is an exposure of what he is like," Parrish said.

Parrish said he is concerned for the safety not only of DeLamielleure, but Bruce Laird, the president of the Baltimore Colts' alumni chapter of retired players.

"I think maybe [Upshaw] is getting a little desperate," Parrish said.

Although Upshaw's union has gotten pension increases for retired players in each of the previous four bargaining agreements, retired players average about $13,000 a year in benefits and feel they should be entitled to more given the NFL's nearly $7 billion in revenues.

"We have the worst pensions in sports with the best league," DeLamielleure said. "And the owners have given more than enough. The two owners I played for, Mr. [Art] Modell and Mr. [Ralph] Wilson are the best people I know. The owners give up 60 percent [of total revenue] and [the union] can't give retired guys more than $13,000?"

Laird, another critic of Upshaw, said Goodell's recent decision to create an alliance of NFL entities was the strongest statement about the retired players' lack of representation.

"My hope has always been to have true democratic representation in the union," Laird said. "But it's obvious to all of us ... that retired players have no place and no representation in the NFLPA.

"Even now, if I knew that Gene Upshaw would represent all players and have democratic elections and we would be part of the union and work with active players, I feel we have no interest in working with a gentleman of Gene Upshaw's morality. He is a nonentity. ... He means nothing to retired players."

DeLamielleure, a father of six, said he thought the threat was at least part intimidation.

"I do believe that Upshaw thought long and hard before he said that," DeLamielleure said. "There's no doubt in my mind. He thought, 'I can intimidate this guy.'

"It's really ugly, what's going on today. I feel bad for Goodell. He walked into a hornet's nest. He's got all these [player] arrests that he's got to get under control, and the guy who leads these men makes a threat like a gangster, like a thug."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/...un06,0,7208019.story?coll=bal-sports-football
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
This is really a black eye for the NFL IMO. It's hard to look at the way players get paid and then look at how some of the older players get looked over if you will. Something has to happen here IMO. I just think that it's got the potential to get out of control quickly. Something needs to be done.
 

Smashmouth24

Member
Messages
418
Reaction score
2
Upshaw is a puppet. And I don't see it getting any better for the union when Troy Vincent takes over. Makes for a great product, though.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
Was not a very smart thing to say ...........what was he thinking?
 

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,405
Reaction score
9,999
There is no reason for former players be be only getting $13,000 a year in pension. They should be recieving royalties every time an old NFL game is played especially with the advent of the NFL network and all the NFL films pieces that are done.

And... I never liked Upshaw anyway and this kind of thing may force him into retirement - at least I can hope anyway!
 

kevwun

New Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
0
If they haven't done so already, the players need to realize the head of their union doesn't have their best interests in mind. The reason their are so many hold outs and trade demands is because the NFLPA goes along with whatever the league wants. Just look at the franchise tag and non-guaranteed contracts. They in no way benefit players, yet their union agreed to them.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
aikemirv;1520339 said:
There is no reason for former players be be only getting $13,000 a year in pension. They should be recieving royalties every time an old NFL game is played especially with the advent of the NFL network and all the NFL films pieces that are done.

And... I never liked Upshaw anyway and this kind of thing may force him into retirement - at least I can hope anyway![/QUOTE]


I too am sympathetic to the retired players plight but in all fairness, Upshaw and the Union really don't represent the retired players. They represent the current players. The problem is that they have little to no voice to represent them. If I'm Gene Upshaw, it's hard for me to go to the mat for guys who will never be able to help me in the future. Not saying it's not the right thing to do because I believe it is. However, I think it's much more the responsability of the NFL, as a league, to fix this problem more so then Upshaw and the Union. The way this could change is if the Union changed the language specific to it's own representation to include retired players. At that point, Upshaw and the Union would have the means to make change and negotiate on there behalf legally. Until that happens, I'd say Upshaw and the Union pretty much have there hands tied. The players must vote these changes into place or the Union will never be able to help the retired players. How do you sell that to the modern player who is more of a me....me.....me person? That's not an easy one to get by, I would imagine.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
kevwun;1520357 said:
If they haven't done so already, the players need to realize the head of their union doesn't have their best interests in mind. The reason their are so many hold outs and trade demands is because the NFLPA goes along with whatever the league wants. Just look at the franchise tag and non-guaranteed contracts. They in no way benefit players, yet their union agreed to them.

Without a doubt.

Who was it last year that said, upon Tagliabue's retirement, that Tags needed to show Goodell where he kept Upshaw's leash?

True, true words.
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,516
Reaction score
9,346
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Not the smartest thing to say. However, coming from a former player who was known as a fierce competitor during his Hall of Fame career, I would chalk the comment up to locker room talk. Most people who have played football know that threats of violence are the norm on the field and in the locker room. The comments become common place when angry or upset, it doesn't mean that it should be taken literally. How many of us have uttered "I should kick his/her ***" or "I could kill _____".

I'm not surprised that he said it about a former player just surprised it was said in front of press.

All of that said, I think Upshaw is being manipulated by the owners and their Commish. It's been going on for years and is not fair to the retired players or the active players. DeLamielleure's gripes are exactly why I ALWAYS back players when they seek more money from the ultra greedy owners.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
slick325;1520372 said:
Not the smartest thing to say. However, coming from a former player who was known as a fierce competitor during his Hall of Fame career, I would chalk the comment up to locker room talk. Most people who have played football know that threats of violence are the norm on the field and in the locker room. The comments become common place when angry or upset, it doesn't mean that it should be taken literally. How many of us have uttered "I should kick his/her ***" or "I could kill _____".

I'm not surprised that he said it about a former player just surprised it was said in front of press.

All of that said, I think Upshaw is being manipulated by the owners and their Commish. It's been going on for years and is not fair to the retired players or the active players. DeLamielleure's gripes are exactly why I ALWAYS back players when they seek more money from the ultra greedy owners.


The ultra greedy owners are giving up 60% of the revenue produced by there product. To me, that's more then sufficiant. The break down here would seem to exist in the inability of the retired players to have representation. I mean, to me, it's a case of the NFL and the players not stepping up to the plate when it comes to these retired players. It is difficult for me to place blame on the owners, in this case.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
There is plenty of money to take care of the former players. Take 1% of the TV money- that has to be $10 million at least a year- and use that for the former players health coverage. That should pretty much cover it.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
burmafrd;1520428 said:
There is plenty of money to take care of the former players. Take 1% of the TV money- that has to be $10 million at least a year- and use that for the former players health coverage. That should pretty much cover it.

I agree Bum. IMO, the means to get something done is already there. It's the process, or should I say, the effort to create a process that is lacking here.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
There are probably only at most 100 or so players that REALLY need help. Mostly for medical problems they mostly got due to playing. That 1% of TV money would take care of them. What the NFL is already doing should take care of the rest of them. What I would like to see is some of the top players of today voluntarily kick in some of their own money- as a mark of respect to those that went before them and are MAINLY responsible for the money they are making today.
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,516
Reaction score
9,346
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
ABQCOWBOY;1520379 said:
The ultra greedy owners are giving up 60% of the revenue produced by there product. To me, that's more then sufficiant. The break down here would seem to exist in the inability of the retired players to have representation. I mean, to me, it's a case of the NFL and the players not stepping up to the plate when it comes to these retired players. It is difficult for me to place blame on the owners, in this case.

I agree that they do need representation. Also, Upshaw needs to make the active players understand that they could potentially be sitting in the same position as some of the retired players who need a higher pension. The active players should have more sympathy for retired players and vice versa.

The 60% seems to be fair. I would like to see how that number is distributed. How much goes to players salaries? Where's Adam when I need him?
 
Top