trickblue
Not Old School...Old Testament...
- Messages
- 31,439
- Reaction score
- 3,961
Link
Wondering about the Wonderlic
BY JOHN SMALLWOOD
Knight Ridder Newspapers
PHILADELPHIA - Apparently, I missed my true calling.
Tuesday, I took a five-question sample of the Wonderlic test run in the Dallas Morning News and got three correct.
That would score me at 60 percent - that's right at the figure NFL teams prefer their quarterbacks to score on the infamous test that is described by its creator, Wonderlic Inc., as a "short-form measure of cognitive ability designed for simple administration and interpretation."
Now, if only I could have been able to stretch 220 pounds over a 6-3 frame, have a howitzer for an arm, throw with the accuracy of a sniper and run like a gazelle, I could have been playing on Sundays instead of watching from the press box.
I make light of this, because some people are trying to use the opposite logic to re-emphasize the notion that University of Texas star Vince Young is a risky gamble to make the transition from successful collegiate quarterback to successful professional one.
A story in Tuesday's Dallas Morning News said that Young, who led Texas to the national championship and finished second in the Heisman Trophy voting, allegedly scored a six the first time he took the 50-question standardized test at last weekend's NFL scouting combine.
That would mean he got only 12 percent of the questions correct. The next day Young reportedly scored a 16 (32 percent).
Now, Young has suddenly become the subject of jokes and is having his intelligence questioned after the supposed confidential results of a subjective test were leaked.
The problem is that Wonderlic isn't a true measure of a person's intelligence at all.
As we have seen over and over, there are too many debatable variables involved to say that tests such as the Wonderlic, the SAT or ACT are indicative of a person's ability to learn.
The NFL gives players 12 minutes to complete the 50 questions on the Wonderlic, which is a lot of pressure to put on someone who knows millions of dollars are potentially at stake.
"It's basically a reading-comprehension test," Kansas City Chiefs president Carl Peterson told the Morning News. "It's an indication that a young man may or may not have a reading-comprehension problem.
"How important is that to us? We do a lot of teaching from playbooks."
When a franchise is going to invest millions of dollars in a player, I have no problem with it conducting as many evaluations as possible to make sure it doesn't make a mistake.
Still, as far as quarterbacks are concerned, there is little indication that the Wonderlic does anything to predict success.
High scores haven't guaranteed success and low scores haven't guaranteed failure.
At the 1999 combine, Donovan McNabb reportedly scored a 12.
That didn't stop the Eagles from drafting him second overall, and all he has done since is win more games than any quarterback over the last six seasons, make five Pro Bowls and guide the Birds to a Super Bowl appearance.
In contrast, Akili Smith (37), Cade McNown (28) and Tim Couch (22), who all reportedly got higher marks on the Wonderlic than McNabb and were also drafted in 1999, are now out of the NFL.
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger's reported score of 25 was lower than 2004 draft mates Eli Manning (39), J.P. Losman (31) and Philip Rivers (30), but Big Ben won a Super Bowl in his second season, while the others are still struggling with the intricacies of the NFL.
The highest-scoring quarterback in 2004 reportedly was Dallas Cowboys project Drew Henson (42), who might have been better off continuing his struggling baseball career in the New York Yankees system than trying the NFL.
Baltimore quarterback Kyle Boller (27) reportedly scored higher than Cincinnati's Carson Palmer (26) and Jacksonville's Byron Leftwich (25) in 2003, but he hasn't come close to having the NFL success they have.
Right now, Boller's status is shakier than Tampa Bay quarterback Chris Simms, who reportedly scored 22 in 2003.
From the 2002 class, Detroit's Joey Harrington and Washington's Patrick Ramsey each reportedly scored 32. But while their teams are considering getting rid of them, David Carr, who reportedly scored a 24, just got an extension from the Houston Texans.
Indianapolis Colts quarterback and two-time MVP Peyton Manning reportedly scored a 28, which was only one point better than all-time draft bust Ryan Leaf, who was picked only one spot behind him in 1998.
Brett Favre is said to have scored 22 and Dan Marino 14.
Now I ask: Who showed less intelligence, those two Hall of Fame players or the combined brain trust of all the teams that passed on them in the draft?
Maybe the report that Vince Young scored low on the Wonderlic does say something. I just doubt that whatever it is has anything to do with his potential to be a successful quarterback in the NFL.
Wondering about the Wonderlic
BY JOHN SMALLWOOD
Knight Ridder Newspapers
PHILADELPHIA - Apparently, I missed my true calling.
Tuesday, I took a five-question sample of the Wonderlic test run in the Dallas Morning News and got three correct.
That would score me at 60 percent - that's right at the figure NFL teams prefer their quarterbacks to score on the infamous test that is described by its creator, Wonderlic Inc., as a "short-form measure of cognitive ability designed for simple administration and interpretation."
Now, if only I could have been able to stretch 220 pounds over a 6-3 frame, have a howitzer for an arm, throw with the accuracy of a sniper and run like a gazelle, I could have been playing on Sundays instead of watching from the press box.
I make light of this, because some people are trying to use the opposite logic to re-emphasize the notion that University of Texas star Vince Young is a risky gamble to make the transition from successful collegiate quarterback to successful professional one.
A story in Tuesday's Dallas Morning News said that Young, who led Texas to the national championship and finished second in the Heisman Trophy voting, allegedly scored a six the first time he took the 50-question standardized test at last weekend's NFL scouting combine.
That would mean he got only 12 percent of the questions correct. The next day Young reportedly scored a 16 (32 percent).
Now, Young has suddenly become the subject of jokes and is having his intelligence questioned after the supposed confidential results of a subjective test were leaked.
The problem is that Wonderlic isn't a true measure of a person's intelligence at all.
As we have seen over and over, there are too many debatable variables involved to say that tests such as the Wonderlic, the SAT or ACT are indicative of a person's ability to learn.
The NFL gives players 12 minutes to complete the 50 questions on the Wonderlic, which is a lot of pressure to put on someone who knows millions of dollars are potentially at stake.
"It's basically a reading-comprehension test," Kansas City Chiefs president Carl Peterson told the Morning News. "It's an indication that a young man may or may not have a reading-comprehension problem.
"How important is that to us? We do a lot of teaching from playbooks."
When a franchise is going to invest millions of dollars in a player, I have no problem with it conducting as many evaluations as possible to make sure it doesn't make a mistake.
Still, as far as quarterbacks are concerned, there is little indication that the Wonderlic does anything to predict success.
High scores haven't guaranteed success and low scores haven't guaranteed failure.
At the 1999 combine, Donovan McNabb reportedly scored a 12.
That didn't stop the Eagles from drafting him second overall, and all he has done since is win more games than any quarterback over the last six seasons, make five Pro Bowls and guide the Birds to a Super Bowl appearance.
In contrast, Akili Smith (37), Cade McNown (28) and Tim Couch (22), who all reportedly got higher marks on the Wonderlic than McNabb and were also drafted in 1999, are now out of the NFL.
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger's reported score of 25 was lower than 2004 draft mates Eli Manning (39), J.P. Losman (31) and Philip Rivers (30), but Big Ben won a Super Bowl in his second season, while the others are still struggling with the intricacies of the NFL.
The highest-scoring quarterback in 2004 reportedly was Dallas Cowboys project Drew Henson (42), who might have been better off continuing his struggling baseball career in the New York Yankees system than trying the NFL.
Baltimore quarterback Kyle Boller (27) reportedly scored higher than Cincinnati's Carson Palmer (26) and Jacksonville's Byron Leftwich (25) in 2003, but he hasn't come close to having the NFL success they have.
Right now, Boller's status is shakier than Tampa Bay quarterback Chris Simms, who reportedly scored 22 in 2003.
From the 2002 class, Detroit's Joey Harrington and Washington's Patrick Ramsey each reportedly scored 32. But while their teams are considering getting rid of them, David Carr, who reportedly scored a 24, just got an extension from the Houston Texans.
Indianapolis Colts quarterback and two-time MVP Peyton Manning reportedly scored a 28, which was only one point better than all-time draft bust Ryan Leaf, who was picked only one spot behind him in 1998.
Brett Favre is said to have scored 22 and Dan Marino 14.
Now I ask: Who showed less intelligence, those two Hall of Fame players or the combined brain trust of all the teams that passed on them in the draft?
Maybe the report that Vince Young scored low on the Wonderlic does say something. I just doubt that whatever it is has anything to do with his potential to be a successful quarterback in the NFL.