Barber needs 191 yards.

MONT17

New Member
Messages
3,269
Reaction score
0
that would be nice 1000 yard back average 60 yards per game... very nice for a #2 guy!!!
 

ghettogandhi

Active Member
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
7
Im pretty sure no team has ever had
2x 1000 yard receivers and
2x 1000 yard rushers
 

Da Hammer

The Natural
Messages
10,604
Reaction score
1
ghettogandhi;1253747 said:
Im pretty sure no team has ever had
2x 1000 yard receivers and
2x 1000 yard rushers and/or
2x 2000 yard quarterbacks
That would be an amazing stat!!! although it would have looked better if it would have just been 1 QB with 4000 yds passing and lots of less sacks and ints... :bang2: :)
 

DallasInDC

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,136
Reaction score
5,019
ro40dallas;1253700 said:
To reach 1000 A/P yards.

That would be amazing to have 2 RB's and 2 WR's with over 1000 total yards each along with a 700 yd TE and 500 yd 3rd WR and over 45 TD's combined. The following would have to occur for us to have these stats:

MBIII 191 A/P yds
Witten 68 yds
Crayton 23 yds
5 TDS from any of the 6 players.

This would have to be one of the most productive offenses that we have had in the last decade.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
What a prolific offense. And to think that just one offensive player made it to the pro bowl. On top of that, people all over the place were arguing that even he shouldn't have made it. What a joke.
 

Joe_Fan

Continuity Is Overrated
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
576
MONT17;1253739 said:
that would be nice 1000 yard back average 60 yards per game... very nice for a #2 guy!!!
The sad part is that our so-called "starter" can barely reach 1000 yards.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
Joe_Fan;1253853 said:
The sad part is that our so-called "starter" can barely reach 1000 yards.


hmm, but strangley when the two are combined they have almost 2000 yards.

1 back 16-1700 yards

2 backs 2000+ yards

I wonder which is better?
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
dargonking999;1253861 said:
hmm, but strangley when the two are combined they have almost 2000 yards.

1 back 16-1700 yards

2 backs 2000+ yards

I wonder which is better?
For the teams with one back and 1700 yards, you have to add in their change of pace back. If he has 300+ yards, there's no difference.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
theogt;1253863 said:
For the teams with one back and 1700 yards, you have to add in their change of pace back. If he has 300+ yards, there's no difference.


but how many do?

Look at LT, and LJ, there in the game every down, except for maybe 5 or 6. ANd its rarely a run play when there not there. So 300+ yards is kind of hard when u get maybe 1 or 2 carries a game
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
dargonking999;1253916 said:
but how many do?

Look at LT, and LJ, there in the game every down, except for maybe 5 or 6. ANd its rarely a run play when there not there. So 300+ yards is kind of hard when u get maybe 1 or 2 carries a game
Turner at San Diego has 415 yards.
 
Top