no kidding..lol. Have you ever tried going to their site and posting something logical? Most of them are not very nice. If you were downing them in some way you could kinda understand. You really cant have a decent debate over there tho because most (not all) of them are quite rude, yet I notice we treat them a little better when they come over here.thewireman;1873561 said:Do Extremeskins fans have nothing better to do then log on this site and post nonsense...:bang2:
IMO there's merit to this. He definitely gives the Offense some swagger and they feed on it. If he can't go we'll need Barber to be the spark along with Tony. It isn't impossible, but having him would be a big help. No doubt about it.RS12;1873559 said:from the time he went of the Carolina game, and the debacle in Washington. This team is dead in the water with T.O. Without him this is a very easy offense to defend.
Hostile;1873619 said:IMO there's merit to this. He definitely gives the Offense some swagger and they feed on it. If he can't go we'll need Barber to be the spark along with Tony. It isn't impossible, but having him would be a big help. No doubt about it.
So would I. No disagreement from me at all and I don't think TO's vacancy is doom. Just that there's merit to him being a key piece of the puzzle. Not a fan of his still, but I can't deny what he brings to the table.DallasCowpoke;1873666 said:I'd be greatly disappointed if leading up to Dallas' first PO game, and they have a pretty good idea Owens isn't going to be able to go, that JG can't game plan a scheme to utilize what we have, as opposed to what's missing. Especially w/ Glenn back.
His join date is as old as mine. He just doesn't post much.Gangsta Spanksta;1873679 said:It's like I said. A new user shouldn't get the privilege to create new threads, until they've been here for awhile.
Hostile;1873675 said:So would I. No disagreement from me at all and I don't think TO's vacancy is doom. Just that there's merit to him being a key piece of the puzzle. Not a fan of his still, but I can't deny what he brings to the table.
ladiewolve;1873604 said:why is everyone basing the last game of the enitre season on how well Jason Garrett has done his job , and further more if we had lost players in the middle of the season we would have been ready by now to play without them.
Other teams have lost key players, but they also have had time to work with the ones taking their places. We lost around 5 to injuries at the very end of the season...plus Glenn has been out all season. What kinda of miracle do you expect someone to work for one game...that means nothing anyway?
Why cant we just get to the playoffs and see what happens there ?
Bach;1873826 said:It's not based on that last game.
Did anyone see us put up a 14-0 lead over Carolina with TO and then from the middle of the 2nd quarter on we only managed two FG's?
Really, we've been without Glenn all year, and without TO we have to start our #3 and #4 WR's. It's been a pleasant surprise we've done as well as we have without TG. But losing TO also is huge. We definitely need him back and close to 100% to have a good chance at advancing.
RS12;1873559 said:from the time he went of the Carolina game, and the debacle in Washington. This team is dead in the water with T.O. Without him this is a very easy offense to defend.
lcharles;1873612 said:You don't have to do much to get banned at extremeskins. I know. Those bunch of pansies are REALLY insecure and thin skinned.