Bears, Pats and SF needing QBs is great for Dallas

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,548
Reaction score
31,914
Would you trade #4 for Miami's #11 and #22?

Too many moving parts to know at this time

if I’m moving on from Dak, then no
If we’re staying with Dak and he’s signed and Sewell is on the board, then no

if both those scenarios are not in effect then probably
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,940
Reaction score
91,551

I think I would do. I just think the options at 11 aren't a huge drop off from a Top 5 where the best players are probably QBs. I like Sewell and wouldn't mind him at 4 but I don't love him enough to turn down two #1 picks. If you make that move, you have three picks in the Top 40 in a draft that one could argue is more consistent in the range of talent from 1-45 than top heavy with talent in the first 5-7 picks.

I saw one mock recently where we could grab Farley at 11 and then come back with an OT at 22. One issue that I think hurts us a bit in terms of moving around the first round is that most mocks have quite a few WRs available. So the best players at some of these spots may be a WR and there is zero chance we'd take a WR.

It does suck that this appears to be a weak draft for DTs. Of all the years for there to not be one or two elite level DTs in the Top 10, it would have to be a draft where we likely will have a Top 10 pick.
 
Top